Problem is, Solas did something he believed was right for a noble reason; (...) Good intentions with bad consequences can be more forgivable than cruel intentions with bad consequences.
Cool motive; still murder though.
Blackwall's story is one of a man who made terrible mistakes for terrible reasons, and spends every waking moment of the rest of his life trying to fix or make up for them. Solas' story is one of a man who made terrible mistakes for pretty reasons, intends to make many many more for reasons that are not so pretty anymore, knows what he's doing is wrong, and still intends to do it anyway.
It is absolute hypocrisy to reduce Blackwall to his crimes and ignore that his entire storyline is about redeeming himself (not the Inquisitor redeeming him through the power of love, mind you, him redeeming himself through his own actions), while forgiving and coddling Solas for supposedly having noble reasons (that do not excuse his past, current or future actions). And it is absolutely not fair how fans will so easily dismiss Blackwall with a handwave of "I don't like redemption stories" while at the same time falling all over themselves to redeem Solas at all costs.
If the difference in treatment between these characters was truly about good or bad intentions, one would figure that the guy who intends to redeem himself of his mistakes by doing as much good as he can would be given more slack than the guy who intends to essentially genocide all current life forms because his nostalgia goggles don't like where the world went without him, no? So yeah, there is a big difference in how fandom treats both characters, but it's not at all about whose intentions are nobler. It's more in who (and particularly, why) people choose to allow to get away with his academic rethoric of murder for a good reason, and who they choose to condemn for never being good enough to make up for his faults.
(sup thread, just passing through)




