I feel like there's a damned if you do damned if you don't situation here. So BioWare has this epic journey scifi game, and then at some point, they release a DLC to expand upon the universe and give players the opportunity to get more content with the characters they like. If the game doesn't add more lore or put more context in certain things here and there, people will complain that the DLC is just a meaningless add-on. But if they do add more lore and put more context in certain things, then people will complain that these things should've been in the main game.
I suppose then that this is more an argument against DLC of any sort, though I admit that the devs occasionally adding on to the game does kind of liven it up for someone like me, who probably played the game multiple times before any add-on content is even announced.
The type of DLC I'm referring to is DLC like From Ashes or Leviathan. DLC that is so integral to the plot that it should have been in the base game.
DLC like Citadel and Omega are perfectly acceptable DLCs because they are side stories that expand the context but are not required.













