Mises à jour des statuts de la communauté

AtreiyaN7

I told the AR and my superior that this is NOT going to happen and that this is ultimately the author's fault because he CLEARLY didn't review the manuscript and approved the stupid motherf---ing thing as is. I also firmly believe that he didn't tell the person responsible for cleaning up his retarded manuscript about what he wanted numbering-wise (seriously).
janv. 25 2016 09:47

AtreiyaN7

I also said he'd better take a Word copy of the godd---ed proof back and fix this himself, because at the end of the day, he didn't review manuscript and created this whole horrible situation himself (plus, I'm already hugely pissed over having had to insert 789 tabs in the first proof - now I find out that there's this huge f---ing problem). S--- like this is why I am thinking about totally quitting and just rolling the dice on my own writing skills.
janv. 25 2016 09:50

AtreiyaN7

UPDATE TO ANGRY RANT: After some discussion with Leona, yes, his numbers are showing up correctly in the Word document. HOWEVER, the fact that it's not importing properly is STILL the author's fault. I get tons of manuscripts with footnotes and endnotes, and NONE of them flake out like this. That means that there is something inherently wrong with the original file, and that IS the author's fault.
janv. 25 2016 11:42