Mises à jour des statuts de la communauté
AtreiyaN7
says this is a new low! One of my idiot authors apparently didn't notice that he didn't have footnotes after EIGHT WHOLE PROOFS!!!!!
mars 04 2016 09:52
-
AtreiyaN7
I'm sure that all smart people know that you have EITHER footnotes or endnotes but not both (because it would be stupid and redundant to enter the same information twice). Great, author, if you'd wanted your endnotes to be footnotes, then perhaps you should have entered them into the footnote boxes where they belonged?
mars 04 2016 09:54 -
AtreiyaN7
Why the f--- is it that you're asking me this EIGHT PROOFS LATER???? This is the idiot whose edits were so bad that I spent three hours and thirty minutes trying to clean things up last time (after giving an estimate where I was hopeful that it would only take an hour and thirty minutes to complete work).
mars 04 2016 09:55 -
AtreiyaN7
And even after all the work I had to do, he later comes back and says he's amazed at how many mistakes got through - like how he accidentally changed Adde to Mary TWICE. Really? I can only catch so many errors (typos, grammar, AND punctuation errors), and frankly, I can't be expected to know the names of your bloody ancestors OR to care about your ancestors (all of whom I am currently cursing because I got stuck with this stupid family genealogy from hell).
mars 04 2016 09:58




Cette mise à jour du statut a atteint le nombre maximum de réponses autorisées.