Aller au contenu

Photo

On Loghain and Redemption (tons of spoilers)


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
346 réponses à ce sujet

#51
Sabriana

Sabriana
  • Members
  • 4 381 messages
All Loghain had to do to be sure that Cailan was in the battle was... nothing. Cailan was already determined to capture honor and glory.

How could Loghain be absolutely certain that the King would fall? IIRC they already had battled Darkspawn three (or was that two?) times and the King's forces came out victorious.

Neither Cailan nor Loghain believed it was a blight.

Cailan, as well as Duncan believed that the fight could be won. The PC and Alistair lose a lot of time fighting their way up the tower, and Alistair even says that they 'most likely missed the signal'.

Only after Cailan throws Orlais into his face once again does he give up, turns away, and says something like "I'm grateful that Maric isn't alive to see his son betray Ferelden."

The issue at Redcliffe could have several explanation, depending on what and how you RP, and what explanation you (as in the gamers) are ready to accept.

Eamon could have fallen ill, but it could have been a legit illness. Flu, indigestion, whatever, and Jowan used this opportunity to poison the Arl under the guise of using healing magic/potions. That's why Isolde is on to Jowan so quickly, and why she is so utterly sure that Jowan was the poisoner.

Or, Ser Donall could simply have been mistaken, he's under a lot of stress, and just misremembered.

Those are just two explanations, I'm sure there are more.



So many questions, so few conclusive answers..., way to go, Bioware ;)


#52
Xandurpein

Xandurpein
  • Members
  • 3 045 messages

Sabriana wrote...

The issue at Redcliffe could have several explanation, depending on what and how you RP, and what explanation you (as in the gamers) are ready to accept.
Eamon could have fallen ill, but it could have been a legit illness. Flu, indigestion, whatever, and Jowan used this opportunity to poison the Arl under the guise of using healing magic/potions. That's why Isolde is on to Jowan so quickly, and why she is so utterly sure that Jowan was the poisoner.
Or, Ser Donall could simply have been mistaken, he's under a lot of stress, and just misremembered.
Those are just two explanations, I'm sure there are more.

So many questions, so few conclusive answers..., way to go, Bioware ;)


While I agree that this could technically be true, it's generally not very fruitful to selectivly disprove some sources of information to make things fit your pet theory. THere has to be some hint in the game to suggest that Ser Donall could indeed be wrong for us to assume this. Otherwise we can all build our own little fanfiction alternate realities where maybe Loghain had bad subordinates who didn't understand that he was just being ironic, or something...

#53
Sabriana

Sabriana
  • Members
  • 4 381 messages
Donall said "He fell ill before the King died" That is a very ambiguous statement. You can't dismiss a theory because of a very short and ambiguous sentence.

Eamon fell ill.

Nothing more is given at that point. Not the type of illness, nor if it was rather sudden, or if it was something that wasn't suspect.

#54
jon 45

jon 45
  • Members
  • 55 messages
Wait, you're actually arguing that the "illness" the knights were originally sent out to find a cure to might be seperate from the poisoning?

#55
jon 45

jon 45
  • Members
  • 55 messages
Wait, you're actually arguing that the "illness" the knights were originally sent out to find a cure to might be seperate from the poisoning?

#56
MordantWastrel

MordantWastrel
  • Members
  • 15 messages
I think the evidence in the story is very clear that Loghain had him poisoned. Jowan escapes the Circle during the prologue and is in Eamon's dungeon the minute you get to the castle, so somewhere in that time, he has to meet Loghain, get hired, spend quite some time at the castle with Eamon's family, poison Eamon, and get thrown in the dungeon.



While it is ambiguous exactly how much time passes between the prologue and Ostagar, I think the story's suggestion is heavily on the side of Loghain having Eamon poisoned before Ostagar - and his motive would be that he doesn't want Eamon's troops wasted on Ostagar when he knows they'll be needed down the road.

#57
TeleProd

TeleProd
  • Members
  • 63 messages

MordantWastrel wrote...

-- and his motive would be that he doesn't want Eamon's troops wasted on Ostagar when he knows they'll be needed down the road.


Eamon was also a threat incase of an Orlesian invasion. His arlessa was from Orlais so who knows where his loyalties lie.

#58
Sabriana

Sabriana
  • Members
  • 4 381 messages
Oh yes, it does become clear later on. But at that moment, when Donall says the arl was ill before the king died, he doesn't know that. All we are told is that the arl was ill before the king dies. That's it. Unless there is a line in the Donall conversation that I persistently miss.

This is spinning out of focus quickly here. It is all about the timeline. Did Loghain have the arl poisoned before the final battle, or after. That was the question. Was the arl already ill with some mundane illness and Jowan poisoned him on the pretext of healing him, or was he sent in to poison the arl before the battle.

All of this thread *must* be read as to not take anything out of context. Donall said nothing about mages, and poison, and suspicions. All he says is "the arl fell ill before the king died." And that's it. If I'm wrong, and he said more than that about the illness, please show me where. I'm all for getting a point cleared up.

Aside from all of that, it was just a suggestion. Just like any other suggestion about time-lines, intent, intrigue, or coincidences. It was actually one of two suggestions of mine. Given the ambiguity of the game, there are a lot of suggestions, role-play opps, and conjecture to be made. Which is entirely good.

P.S. We also don't know exactly when the knights were sent out. Was it after Jowan was unmasked? If so, then Donall should also know that the arl was ill due to poisoning. Even Teagan didn't know until after the battle of Redcliffe. Isolde takes him by surprise when she meets him at the windmill.

Modifié par Sabriana, 09 janvier 2010 - 02:21 .


#59
Lotion Soronarr

Lotion Soronarr
  • Members
  • 14 481 messages
Cailan was "stubborn". While Loghain and Maric did drift apart, Maric still listened to Loghain.
Cailan was becoming more rebelious, and Loghain had less and less influence over him, which probably infuriated him. He'd gotten used to getting things his way, and he's convinced he knows what's best for Ferelden.
When he called in the Orlesians, Loghain probably lost it, and begun planing his downfall.

But he himself lives in  denial and doesn't want to belive it..even after you spare him.



That said, redemption comes from regreat, feeling guilt and wanting to undo it - not trough heroic actions. I for one never cared to give Loghain the opportunity to enter the history books as a hero. He doesn't deserve it. Let him redeem himself another way if he can, but I will NOT allow him a place of honor after what he did.


Who says Eamon was poisoned before the battle?


DAVID ****in' GAIDER. That's who.:P

I?m really irrtated by those who constatly ignore what was said and proven and have such a massive need to defend Loghain, that they  will pull apart a sentance and look for alternate interpretations (no amtter how far fetched), jsut so they could continue ignoring the truth.

What the hell do you simpletons think "moving against Cailan" means? How can you constantly ignore the fact that Loghain needed the signal since he couldn't SEE the battle, ergo his claims that the battle was lost is BOGUS.
The man is insane. Period.

Modifié par Lotion Soronnar, 09 janvier 2010 - 03:18 .


#60
kgav

kgav
  • Members
  • 97 messages
There can be no redemption for Loghain in my eyes. He was a manipulative power hungry traitor who created and sustained several sets of circumstances that caused the death of some and the suffering of others. He believes the ends justify the means and he is the sole authority to determine what is to be done. Loghain's treachery was not a spur of the moment thing, he had been under mining Calian's authority for sometime.

I can't believe anyone would let him live after all he had done. As a human noble, Loghain must die, Howe must die and anyone who gets in the way of those two dying, dies as well.

Modifié par kgav, 09 janvier 2010 - 03:21 .


#61
Saturn21

Saturn21
  • Members
  • 6 messages
Honestly people are also forgetting that Calian was not the only victim of Loghain. He weakened his country by leaving a entire army to be slaughtered not to mention eaten!. Sold elves to the Tevinters saying that he couldn't defend the alienage which was his fault for not defeating the horde before it could grow in enough strength to assualt Denerim. His right hand man was Arl Howe who tortured other Banns sons, imprisoned Templars to suffer from lyrium withdrawl and stole land by killing off other Arls,Teyrns whether they were friends or foe didn't matter. You can judge him by his allies. He believed only he could save the land when all he did was weaken his country so no sympathy for a man who made his own people miserible for a undeserved pride to lead the country himself.

Sorry for this being so poor written and structured Image IPB

Modifié par Saturn21, 09 janvier 2010 - 04:06 .


#62
tallon1982

tallon1982
  • Members
  • 1 204 messages
Just throwing this out there but while reading the Epilogue of The Stolen Throne where they talked about Rowan...I got a feeling that Eamon had the same sickness or something similar. It wasn't curable by conventional means nor by magic. Makes you wonder doesn't it?

#63
RangerSG

RangerSG
  • Members
  • 1 041 messages

Xandurpein wrote...
*snip*

The whole plan for the Battle of Ostagar hinges on the lighting of the Beacon. I know enough military tactics to know that if you want to make a two-pronged attack like that against a superior enemy force, you do not want the "anvil" fight alone for too long, before the "hammer" strikes. The whole idea with the signal in the tower would logically to have Loghain's force strike form the side or rear, just as the front ranks of the Darkspawn horde reaches the King's line. Any delay after that simply means lots of dead in the "anvil" force for no gain. It is perfectly possible that when the beacon was lit, the Battle was already lost, because it was too late, but there is simply no way for us to know, based on evidence in game.

We get information that suggests that Loghain believed that it was to late, but also that he probably decieves himself with that, but there is no real proof one way or the other....


Actually, doesn't Wynne admit through her teeth if you spare Loghain that the beacon fire was probably lit too late to save the battle? I seem to recall that. Now that doesn't change the fact that the whole reason the Tower was overrun by darkspawn is Loghain's men left it abandoned for no good reason, so IMHO, the beacon-fire was meant to be a ruse, and he knew it would be overrun quickly when the battle started. Two Grey Wardens couldn't...no...they'd die like the rest. So sure, send them along.

Interesting that the one person that had a plan that COULD have ensured that Loghain had to commit or be called a traitor was Uldred...Loghain's ally.

#64
Xandurpein

Xandurpein
  • Members
  • 3 045 messages

RangerSG wrote...

Actually, doesn't Wynne admit through her teeth if you spare Loghain that the beacon fire was probably lit too late to save the battle? I seem to recall that. Now that doesn't change the fact that the whole reason the Tower was overrun by darkspawn is Loghain's men left it abandoned for no good reason, so IMHO, the beacon-fire was meant to be a ruse, and he knew it would be overrun quickly when the battle started. Two Grey Wardens couldn't...no...they'd die like the rest. So sure, send them along.

Interesting that the one person that had a plan that COULD have ensured that Loghain had to commit or be called a traitor was Uldred...Loghain's ally.


While it is possible that Loghain did somehow entice the Darkspawn to enter the tower to ensure that the beacon wasn't lit in time, there is no proof of it. It's a nice theory, but it could just as well have had nothing to do with Loghain. We just don't know.

#65
Xandurpein

Xandurpein
  • Members
  • 3 045 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

That said, redemption comes from regreat, feeling guilt and wanting to undo it - not trough heroic actions. I for one never cared to give Loghain the opportunity to enter the history books as a hero. He doesn't deserve it. Let him redeem himself another way if he can, but I will NOT allow him a place of honor after what he did.


We all know you and I see things differently on this. I truthfully find it a bit morbid that so many people are concerned about who gets what obituary. The main thing is to save the world from a Blight. The last thing he does was to tell me "I have done so may things wrong, let me do this one thing right". Well.. good enough for me. I was perfectly ready to die to save Ferelden myself if need be, but I sure as hell as more important things to worry about than whether this guy got a place in the history books or not.

#66
Sir Ulrich Von Lichenstien

Sir Ulrich Von Lichenstien
  • Members
  • 5 177 messages

Xandurpein wrote...

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

That said, redemption comes from regreat, feeling guilt and wanting to undo it - not trough heroic actions. I for one never cared to give Loghain the opportunity to enter the history books as a hero. He doesn't deserve it. Let him redeem himself another way if he can, but I will NOT allow him a place of honor after what he did.


We all know you and I see things differently on this. I truthfully find it a bit morbid that so many people are concerned about who gets what obituary. The main thing is to save the world from a Blight. The last thing he does was to tell me "I have done so may things wrong, let me do this one thing right". Well.. good enough for me. I was perfectly ready to die to save Ferelden myself if need be, but I sure as hell as more important things to worry about than whether this guy got a place in the history books or not.


The funniest fact that Lotion constantly ignores, is that before this story takes place, Loghain has already written himself into the history books as a hero.

He is oft referred to as 'The Hero of River Dane', I would imagine that despite some of the atrocities he has done, some people will still remember him for that even if you did execute him. Doesn't stop people from allowing him one last chance to redeem himself for those actions. But then again I guess some people are to stuck up their own arses to understand why people would do such a thing, even if it is only a computer game.

#67
darkshadow136

darkshadow136
  • Members
  • 1 796 messages
Loghain is a power hungry, self diluted, obsessed ego maniac. Outside of 1 of my play through's which I did just to get the achievement, it has always been off with his head he deserves no less for all the damage he caused during the blight. I also wish they gave us the option to go kill him in the beginning after Lothering like Morrigan suggested, then build your army. Why have Morrigan give us that advice without it being a viable option. They could have just made the Queen our adversary at the landsmeet then over the loss of her father. I just feel they made the game too linear the way they did it.

After all they made different cutscene videos with the same speeches when addressing the army for the final confrontation. Why couldn't they just do the same in placing the queeen in place of Loghain for the cutscenes throughout the game progression scenes.

Modifié par darkshadow136, 10 janvier 2010 - 09:48 .


#68
Xandurpein

Xandurpein
  • Members
  • 3 045 messages

darkshadow136 wrote...

Loghain is a power hungry, self diluted, obsessed ego maniac. Outside of 1 of my play through's which I did just to get the achievement, it has always been off with his head he deserves no less for all the damage he caused during the blight. I also wish they gave us the option to go kill him in the beginning after Lothering like Morrigan suggested, then build your army. Why have Morrigan give us that advice without it being a viable option. They could have just made the Queen our adversary at the landsmeet then over the loss of her father. I just feel they made the game too linear the way they did it.

After all they made different cutscene videos with the same speeches when addressing the army for the final confrontation. Why couldn't they just do the same in placing the queeen in place of Loghain for the cutscenes throughout the game progression scenes.


For the obvious reason that with Loghain gone there is really no need to have Anora as an adversary at all. You can of course still try to call a Landsmeet to make Alistair king, but that would just be pointless and divisive as Anora has no real conflict with the Grey Wardens. Without Loghain the Civil War is probably over anyway.

And of course you don't kill off the best villian a quarter into the game. That would be pointless...Image IPB

Modifié par Xandurpein, 10 janvier 2010 - 09:58 .


#69
darkshadow136

darkshadow136
  • Members
  • 1 796 messages

Xandurpein wrote...

darkshadow136 wrote...

Loghain is a power hungry, self diluted, obsessed ego maniac. Outside of 1 of my play through's which I did just to get the achievement, it has always been off with his head he deserves no less for all the damage he caused during the blight. I also wish they gave us the option to go kill him in the beginning after Lothering like Morrigan suggested, then build your army. Why have Morrigan give us that advice without it being a viable option. They could have just made the Queen our adversary at the landsmeet then over the loss of her father. I just feel they made the game too linear the way they did it.

After all they made different cutscene videos with the same speeches when addressing the army for the final confrontation. Why couldn't they just do the same in placing the queeen in place of Loghain for the cutscenes throughout the game progression scenes.


For the obvious reason that with Loghain gone there is really no need to have Anora as an adversary at all. You can of course still try to call a Landsmeet to make Alistair king, but that would just be pointless and divisive as Anora has no real conflict with the Grey Wardens. Without Loghain the Civil War is probably over anyway.

And of course you don't kill off the best villian a quarter into the game. That would be pointless...Image IPB


Good point that would ruin the build up to want to be-head him. lol;)

#70
Asylumer

Asylumer
  • Members
  • 199 messages
I just posted down my entire argument for Loghain under "The Complete Defense of Loghain Mac Tir." It covers the entirety of why I see Loghain's betrayal as highly unlikely and what I find wrong with those who accuse him of betraying Cailan. It also includes evidence I brought up in the "Betrayals..." thread.

After I edited it the format went screwy though. I'm not sure if I can fix that or not.

WARNING: There's quite a bit of ham as I play lawyer.

Modifié par Asylumer, 10 janvier 2010 - 10:43 .


#71
Selej

Selej
  • Members
  • 192 messages
[quote]tallon1982 wrote...

Loghain also saved Maric from worse situations in the novels so the fact that he left Calian to die makes it even worse. He ditched his own men to save Maric with Rowan's help. [/quote]

The difference is, he is friends with Maric. He can't stand Cailan as he viewed him as just some kid who wants to play War. Maric earned his respect and friendship, Cailan was a spoiled brat who wanted to carve out a name for himself because his father was famous.

[quote]melkathi wrote...

I was under the impression that Loghain
had planned to take out the "bad influence". Create a situation were
the Grey Wardens would be in the front line being slaughtered, while
he'd retreat with Cailan. When the king chose to have his own way
again, Loghain might have felt that he might be too far gone to
save.[/quote]

This explanation doesn't take everything into
account. Sure, he could malign the Wardens, but for what purpose? One
thing know is that Loghain didn't believe there was a Blight.

However,
if Loghain thought the Wardens betrayed the army at Ostagar by delaying
the signal, that could fit together given his paranoia.

Loghain already believes there to be no Blight, so he suspects the Wardens of something.
The Wardens fail to light the signal in time and the King's forces are swamped in Darkspawn.
This
is where Loghain's displays his paranoia -- he can't risk his men and
has taken the tower as proof that the Warden's are part of a plot.
He decides against entering the fray where his army will take heavy losses and retreats.
He places a bounty on the Wardens and stops them from entering Ferelden because he's now convinced there is an Olressian plot.

That
is an explanation that accounts for his strategic genius AND his
paranoia for Orlais. Loghain isn't completely nuts, but he did let his
issues with Orlais cloud his judgement. This also explains why he
accuses the player of working for Orlais when you confront him at the
Landsmeet.

Or you can believe Loghain drools and is a 2-dimensional character... up to you.
[/quote]

After the effects of The Calling, he is completly justified in my eyes of his paranoia of Orlais. (spoilers) Orlesians and Wardens for that matter, almost captured Maric to send back to Orlais when they were gunning for Loghain. Given what Orlais has done to Loghain, do you really blame him? Orlais and Wardens almost took his best friend, would have left the kingdom that he fought valiantly for, left open for the taking again. Now here comes Duncan, one of the Wardens in a group of Wardens that were responsible for Maric's danger, comes and suggests two of his men light the beacan. They get delayed, as it's overrun with Darkspawn, Loghain worries that it could be yet another plot from the Wardens which isn't really unheard of given what happened before, and tries to cut his losses and retreats.

#72
Swifty

Swifty
  • Members
  • 201 messages
I think people miss the whole point of Loghain and what he did. Watch the game closely. There are plot points about him strewn everywhere. If you haven't "redeemed" Loghain--try it. He's a marvelously complex character. My fav in fact due to his complexity.

1) He does not know that the Grey Wardens must slay the Archdemons--he sees them as just a pile of undisciplined mercenaries out of Orlais who do not work for the king and are in fact, a threat to Fereldon's hard-won freedom.

2) If people *listen* at the beginning, before Ostagar there are two plot points. One is that Loghain has sent scouts. [I heard them while wandering about the camp] So he knows Ostagar could possibly be overrun. He does his best to convince Cailin, [who is busy boozing it up with the GW's instead of attending to duty] not to enter the battle while Loghain spends his time shut up in his tent trying to sort out the mess. Cailin shuts down his best military advisor due to  some idiotic quest for glory.  Remember, this is the man who is married to Loghain's daughter--whom Logain truly loves. Even Duncan mentions that Cailin is rash and it's just not going to be as easy as Cailin thinks if this is a real blight.

3) Loghain looks across the battlefield when the beacon is lit,  realizes they are going to be swarmed and he will lose all his troops. He's smart enough to know that if they do not retreat--he will have no army to fight again.

4) The poisoning of Arl Eamon--why isn't he dead? There's at least 5 different deadly poisons in the game but Eamon lives? Who is to say the ashes even worked? Perhaps, like arsenic,in slow doses it doesn't kill and when it was stopped, the recovery started. This means Eamon's troops won't be at Ostagar--another fighting troop to save to fight when the country is unified enough to fight, as well as Eamon himself.  Or, Cailin won't wait for them anyway. As it turns out--they survive to fight with the Warden at the end. If they had died at Ostagar--the Warden would have lost the battle. Turns out--Loghain was right, strategically speaking. As well, it is Loghain who tells Cailin to wait for Fereldon reinforcements.

5) Loghain is all about freedom and all about the "common man". He rose from the ranks on sheer merit, hard work and brilliance. He's stuck with a dolt for a son-in-law and a not much brighter candidate in Alister.

6) Once Loghain retreats from Ostagar--the Banns turn on him for letting Cailin die. It doesn't help that Arl Howe is piffing them all off, as well and following his own agenda, creating more problems.

7) His own daughter is willing to sell him out and believes that he would deliberately kill her and her husband. Yet he loves her anyway. He has no pretensions to the throne--if he did--he could have taken it easily since he had far more martial support than any other leader in the country. If he wanted a coup--he could have staged one or assassinated Maric before he ever got on the throne in the first place since he was the one who tossed out the Orlesians. He calls it out in the Landsmeet when he tells Eamon he has grown rich and fat and forgotten what it's like to work hard and lead.

8) He believes in freedom from oppression. Therefore, he would naturally side with the mages since he lived his early life under Orlesian domination. Secondly, the templars are a fighting force and another potential problem in dominance against the country.

9) Watch when Zevran is hired. Loghain is drinking and obviously exhausted when Arl Howe comes in, Zevran in tow. The look of disgust on his face is palpable.

10) "The Blight" is part of a 400 year old legend. The Orlesians were only turfed out 30 years ago and have been trying to infiltrate back into Fereldon, ever since. Everyone in power is aware that the Dwarves have been kicking Darkspawn butt for centuries. As a pragmatist--Loghain sees the obvious, the Orlesians are a very real threat. He has no "info" on how organized the darkspawn may be. He's well aware of how exigent the Orlesians are.

11) Loghain has nothing to gain by killing the Couslands. He won't gain their lands or titles--Howe can. Howe can also potentially take the throne with those resources. Loghain, can't.

12) If Alister truly cared about the country he'd care about *uniting* it. By putting Alister on the throne and sparing Loghain--everyone wins since all the of Arls have a stake in the outcome and will commit their resources. Yet Alister throws a childish hissy fit.  Oh gee--he lost Duncan? Well how many people has the MC or Loghain lost in this mess? Does that excuse them? Or is the country the priority here? On top of that--never in the game does Alister want to "do his duty" by taking the throne. He bailed on the Templars now he bails on the Gray Wardens. Loghain, right or wrong--does not bail out, whine about injustice and agree or disagree he does his duty even when he finds it reprehensible or painful. If the MC executes him, he dies with dignity. Also, Alister and the MC are guerilla fighters, essentially. Loghain is the best general in the country used to strategic commanding of troops not mere butt-kicking. Killing him is wasting a valuable resource.

All throughout the story we are told stuff about Loghain 3rd hand. Yet, there's no proof that Loghain knew about the elven slavery, or a number of other problems that he was too busy to see.

He also talks about how it is easier to die oneself than watch others die. He is obviously quite pained about the loss of troops at Ostagar.

If Loghain is to be the villain it would be due to his single-minded patriotism. He's not particularly devious--he's actually blunt to the point of abrasiveness and he's no scheming politician like his daughter or Arl Howe.

Frankly I see him as a man betrayed on all sides that starts losing it. When he's recruited he does his duty and "puts his back into it." Something, if you listen to Alister's carrying on at the beginning when you ask him to do something--he doesn't.

And just to be clear I adored Alister. But as a king without Anora? Disaster. The Arls would be mucking up in civil war within a week and the Orlesians would walk in and mop up the mess.

Modifié par Swifty, 06 mars 2010 - 08:47 .


#73
darrylzero

darrylzero
  • Members
  • 181 messages
I think the real shame here is how underdeveloped Cailan is as a character. That's not a criticism, really, there's no reason why we would understand him in-game, but it makes some of this confusing. Why *was* Cailan so comfy with the Orlesians? How is it that he picked up no resentment or even distrust from the various people in his life who fought to free Ferelden? I'm sure the writing team, or Gaider really in this case, has a decent explanation, but I find it awfully confusing myself.

I believe the following is true:

1) Loghain would have preferred that Cailan survived, but did not think the battle was winnable.

2) He had decided this before the battle, even at the cost of Cailan, and is sad to see the beacon get lit, ruining his excuse for quitting the field.

3) Most but not all of the other bad things he does he feels he has to do in the context of a civil war in order to muster the necessary power to stabilize the country and/or are initiatives of the slimier Howe.

4) This does not make them necessarily acceptable. The choice to allow slaving, in particular, was always enough to get my city elf to kill him.

I think the description above of his opinion of the wardens is an excellent point. (Swifty: "He does not know that the Grey Wardens must slay the Archdemons--he sees them as just a pile of undisciplined mercenaries out of Orlais who do not work for the king and are in fact, a threat to Fereldon's hard-won freedom"). However, I do think there are other points at which Swifty probably goes too far in minimizing how morally compromised Loghain is.

I think the OP is correct to point out that our interpretation of a lot of this does depend a great deal on when Eamon was poisoned. I don't think it's very clear from what we know, however, so that does little for us.

Also, while I clearly like the theory that Loghain is sad to see the beacon lit and his excuse for never entering the battle quashed, I do have to acknowledge that it does look like Loghain is surveying the battlefield before ordering the retreat. That's a little odd, though... If Loghain can survey the battlefield and decide it looks too hopeless to join, then why is lighting the beacon in the first place important at all, particularly at such an imprecise time? Our confusion there may stem partially from the weirdness of video game logic -- they needed us to have something important to do, and so lighting the beacon was incorporated -- but it may also indicate that Loghain can't really see the battlefield that well from his vantage point, which further supports the idea that he had decided to quit the field earlier.

Some of this, though, I think is simply too ambiguous to be sure about.

Modifié par darrylzero, 06 mars 2010 - 09:54 .


#74
shogei

shogei
  • Members
  • 3 messages
I think the Couslands were a threat to Loghain's position because they led the only other teryn in the country. I suspect Loghain gave Highever to Howe for the service of eliminating someone who could have objected to Loghain's power grab. Poisoning Eamon accomplished the same, smoothing over the opposition. Saying it took only a day to get here or there means little as there is no real day by day story telling. It is possible that it took several days to go from Circle to Ostagar. (Off point, but I would be interested in knowing what scale the map is on)

#75
Guest_DSerpa_*

Guest_DSerpa_*
  • Guests
@ darrylzero



Play through Return to Ostagar and read Cailan's documents. That will explain why he was so comfy with the Orlesians.