Aller au contenu

Photo

Kelly: "Their methods are extreme..."


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
701 réponses à ce sujet

#526
Arijharn

Arijharn
  • Members
  • 2 850 messages

Booglarize wrote...

Arijharn wrote...

To be honest, while I may be over-rationalizing here, I don't see the point of being racist, sexist or even homophobic for that matter. I just see the concept of being that moronic, essentially your cutting down 'potential friends' for no real reason.

  


Well, you could take that one step further - there's no point in imbuing any immutable difference with some kind of grand cosmic significance, to the point where you will only help people who share [immutable trait X] to the exclusion of people who don't. Cerberus's entire premise as an organization, to me, seems like one big logical misstep. 


That's true, however, Cerberus isn't anti-alien, it's just pro-human. It's not mutually exclusive. It's not like they kick Turians to the curb, it's just they have this lofty ambition of what position humanity should hold, and work tirelessly towards it.

#527
AntiChri5

AntiChri5
  • Members
  • 7 965 messages

Arijharn wrote...

Booglarize wrote...

Arijharn wrote...

To be honest, while I may be over-rationalizing here, I don't see the point of being racist, sexist or even homophobic for that matter. I just see the concept of being that moronic, essentially your cutting down 'potential friends' for no real reason.

  


Well, you could take that one step further - there's no point in imbuing any immutable difference with some kind of grand cosmic significance, to the point where you will only help people who share [immutable trait X] to the exclusion of people who don't. Cerberus's entire premise as an organization, to me, seems like one big logical misstep. 


That's true, however, Cerberus isn't anti-alien, it's just pro-human. It's not mutually exclusive. It's not like they kick Turians to the curb, it's just they have this lofty ambition of what position humanity should hold, and work tirelessly towards it.


Which just so happens to be above all Turians.....

#528
Booglarize

Booglarize
  • Members
  • 643 messages

Arijharn wrote...

That's true, however, Cerberus isn't anti-alien, it's just pro-human. It's not mutually exclusive. It's not like they kick Turians to the curb, it's just they have this lofty ambition of what position humanity should hold, and work tirelessly towards it.


Even if they don't go out of their way to harm non-humans,  I wouldn't consider it much of a saving grace. Take the example of non-violent racial/ethnic supremacist (or "pride") groups in today's world. Even if they don't actively harm people who are different, the ill-will they bring about and reinforce by suggesting that there's something morally significant about immutable differences does harm societies in very real ways. 

Modifié par Booglarize, 30 mars 2010 - 01:19 .


#529
Arijharn

Arijharn
  • Members
  • 2 850 messages

Booglarize wrote...

Arijharn wrote...

That's true, however, Cerberus isn't anti-alien, it's just pro-human. It's not mutually exclusive. It's not like they kick Turians to the curb, it's just they have this lofty ambition of what position humanity should hold, and work tirelessly towards it.


Even if they don't go out of their way to harm non-humans,  I wouldn't consider it much of a saving grace. Take the example of non-violent racial/ethnic supremacist (or "pride") groups in today's world. Even if they don't actively harm people who are different, the ill-will they bring about and reinforce by suggesting that there's something morally significant about immutable does harm societies in very real ways. 


But how is it Cerberus' responsibility to govern how an alien species views itself in relation to humanity? Cerberus is a 'shadow organisation', what public ill-will do they generate? The Terra Firma party, is this actually 'Cerberus' (I know TIM has had a hand in deciding who runs it in the past, but that's not the same as actually running it... how many of Cerberus' agents have gone 'rogue' in the past?)? Besides, it's unlikely that will ever get anywhere because it obviously polarises many people.

I see Cerberus as being of this position: If another species wants to further their own cause, then go for it, just don't try to step on humanity because we'll step back. That's their entire policy. Honestly, how is that ideal any different from modern intelligence services?

#530
Arijharn

Arijharn
  • Members
  • 2 850 messages

AntiChri5 wrote...

Arijharn wrote...

Booglarize wrote...

Arijharn wrote...

To be honest, while I may be over-rationalizing here, I don't see the point of being racist, sexist or even homophobic for that matter. I just see the concept of being that moronic, essentially your cutting down 'potential friends' for no real reason.

  


Well, you could take that one step further - there's no point in imbuing any immutable difference with some kind of grand cosmic significance, to the point where you will only help people who share [immutable trait X] to the exclusion of people who don't. Cerberus's entire premise as an organization, to me, seems like one big logical misstep. 


That's true, however, Cerberus isn't anti-alien, it's just pro-human. It's not mutually exclusive. It's not like they kick Turians to the curb, it's just they have this lofty ambition of what position humanity should hold, and work tirelessly towards it.


Which just so happens to be above all Turians.....


What exactly is your point? That we shouldn't go for what we want? That we should 'mitigate' what we want/need? Why should we mitigate what we want when seemingly no-one else does?

I'm all for co-operation, but only if they want to co-operate with us. Why are you so inclined to believe out of hand that the Turians do want to bring us ("us" being humanity) closer together?

We are different. Difference will also cause points of aggression. Cerberus isn't in the public eye, and it helps defend us against those who might do us harm, without sacrificing diplomacy from the main players (aka; the System's Alliance)

#531
Kwom Masbag

Kwom Masbag
  • Members
  • 132 messages

Arijharn wrote...
I see Cerberus as being of this position: If another species wants to further their own cause, then go for it, just don't try to step on humanity because we'll step back. That's their entire policy. Honestly, how is that ideal any different from modern intelligence services?


I'd be fine (well, relatively speaking) if that was Cerberus's entire position, however, Cerberus actually seems to be trying to actively step on the other races.  In this, Ceberus goes too far; protecting humanities interests is one thing, elavating the desires of one man to the exlusion of billions, if not trillions, of others is something far different.

#532
Arijharn

Arijharn
  • Members
  • 2 850 messages

Kwom Masbag wrote...

I'd be fine (well, relatively speaking) if that was Cerberus's entire position, however, Cerberus actually seems to be trying to actively step on the other races.  In this, Ceberus goes too far; protecting humanities interests is one thing, elavating the desires of one man to the exlusion of billions, if not trillions, of others is something far different.


What 'stepping?' I admit other than a brief overview of the books I haven't read them, but I know that Cerberus purposely tried to gain access codes for the migrant fleet and had a skirmish with them. However, the Migrant Fleet could actually pose as a huge security risk (I'm not saying that in this regard I agree with TIM, but I can certainly understand his point of view).

#533
Andorfiend

Andorfiend
  • Members
  • 648 messages

Spartas Husky wrote...

Andorfiend wrote...


You can say a judge is a hypocrite, and you might even be right. But we still need people to exercise judgement. That is a job that needs doing, and it needs qualified people doing it.


Who is qualified to do so?

Take todays day. Who is qualified to tell a Green Berrett how to do his job?Who is qualified to tell Cerberus not to do anything ....inmoral?


Well let's see. The UCMJ, the Geneva convention and International warcrimes law for starters form the basis of the legal system within which a Green beret works. In direct command is a chain of command which goes up from his unit commander to Chief General of the Army to the (civilian) Secretary of Defense to the President. who is ultimately responsible for that Green Berets actions. He is responsible to although only somewhat answerable to American Public.

And the reason that Green Beret had damm well better follow orders and not kill everyone he thinks is a bad guy is that he just flat out doesn't know who is a bad guy or not. Someone trying to kill him? Pretty damn simple answer. Scummy gun running bastard who sells weapons to terrorists? Might be a bad guy, might be a Mossad mole penetrating the organization and if the Green Beret kills him it will screw up years worth of intelligence operations. The real world does not have the neat simple answers you think it does.

Spartas Husky wrote...
The Alliance, which is another word for a politician who steals money everytime they can?


And you're basing that on... what exactly? We haven't really seen much of the Alliance really. But the Alliance isn't 'a politician' it is a political/military organization responsible for all extraterrestrial humanity. So that would be yes, that's who Cerberus should be answering to. It's who they were answering to in fact before TIM decided to start murdering the Alliance soldiers who were responsible for protecting the humanity he claims to serve. So. TIM has cut himself off from the over all organization that might prevent him from screwing up allied intelligence or dropping a bomb on people with whom we were about to sign a treaty.

Spartas Husky wrote...
A simple civilian who has no idea what is at stake and a civilians job is to pay taxes and be quiet.

Huh. I was under the impression you're an American. Forgive me if I'm wrong. But if you are, and that's what you think the job of an American citizen is you own your civics professor a swift kick in the crotch. An american citizen through his right of franchise has the duty to keep informed of events and politics local, national and global and to voice his opinions on them to his elected representative. He has the duty to vote his conscience based on his informed opinion.

In simpler terms the whole reasons Green Berets exist is to allow civillians to live their lives in peace. And to keep supplying those Green Berets with arms and paychecks. Military organizations do forget this from time to time. The results are usually disastrous. Unless you're going to claim that a military controled country like Burma or North Korea can compete economically or militarily with a civilian controled country like South Korea or the US. In other words central control like TIM wants to exercise will inevitably lead to humanity falling further behind the other races like the Asari or Salarians who reap the benefits of internal competition.


Spartas Husky wrote...
I am not contradicting my self. Point is, the guy on the field can't see right from wrong. The guy in charge of him has other things to worry about, and is more interested in success not whether or not what he is doing is acceptable.

Everyone on the field, is to deep to see the actual line.

Everyone in Charge cares not about the enemy, or the thousands of civilians, he/she cares about the couple of hundreds soldiers he/she wants to get out alive. Nothing else matters.

Everyone That is right on top watching the bigger picture dont see anyone, not a line, nor individuals, they see progress in 2 ways. The expdient bath, or the long path. Both are drentched in the blood of millions, doesn't matter which way you choose, you think you choose the right path because it satisfies your conciounce in some way.


The battalion commander had better have his eye on the bigger picture, and he has to hammer that view down through the chain of command.

But you're right. And that's why the guy in the field isn't in charge. The US employs thousands of people whose job boils down to keeping track of what the hell is going on in this big, complex, interconnected world of ours. And they boil their information down into daily intelligence reports and it flows around the complex chains of communication within the national government. All so that we can act like we know what's going on, and we often get it right. You really think TIM can do better all by his lonesome in the vastly larger and more complex world of a galactic civilization?

The world isn't simple. It isn't black and white. Good guys and bad guys. Military heros and civillian sheep. Not all politicians are corrupt. Not all buisiness men are possessed of more greed than sense. And not all James Bond villains have good ideas.

Spartas Husky wrote...
Like I said before. Which one do you favor?

Mutilation, torture, experimantation 
of millions of animals to produce a cure of some sort over a long
period?

OR

Mutilation, torture experimantation of a couple thousands of
humans to do the same, in a short time?


False dilema. There is no particular reason to think things will go faster or more ethically with human subjects. There are also sound reasons for using animals in preference to humans for a wide variety of reasons depending on the research in question. And besides the point really. We're damn near at the point of being able to model biochemical processes on an atom by atom basis now. In a century live testing will be only used for final stage confirmation of the computer modeling. Nothing Cerberus does is sound science or even slightly neccessary.

#534
Booglarize

Booglarize
  • Members
  • 643 messages

Arijharn wrote...

But how is it Cerberus' responsibility to govern how an alien species views itself in relation to humanity? Cerberus is a 'shadow organisation', what public ill-will do they generate? The Terra Firma party, is this actually 'Cerberus' (I know TIM has had a hand in deciding who runs it in the past, but that's not the same as actually running it... how many of Cerberus' agents have gone 'rogue' in the past?)? Besides, it's unlikely that will ever get anywhere because it obviously polarises many people.

I see Cerberus as being of this position: If another species wants to further their own cause, then go for it, just don't try to step on humanity because we'll step back. That's their entire policy. Honestly, how is that ideal any different from modern intelligence services?


Well, Cerberus isn't much of a 'shadow organization'  - a good chunk of the people you run into over the course of the game have heard of them, and know what they're all about.

But that's besides the point, for the most part. It is everyone's responsibility not to pointlessly stoke interethnic (or in this case, interspecies) tension, especially when the situation is already tenuous (leaving aside for a moment that such a course of action is already illogical, which I would've though might be enough to disqualify it off the bat). I hold Cerberus responsible for contributing to tensions the same way I would have held the armchair racists (particularly those in the media) responsible for the degree to which their "don't step on whites" concern-trolling  contributed to the tensions that led to the Red Summer of 1919. 

#535
Guest_Shandepared_*

Guest_Shandepared_*
  • Guests

Arijharn wrote...


I see Cerberus as being of this position: If another species wants to further their own cause, then go for it, just don't try to step on humanity because we'll step back. That's their entire policy. Honestly, how is that ideal any different from modern intelligence services?


It isn't any different but most people aren't intelligent enough to grasp how important those intelligence services are. Funny.

#536
AntiChri5

AntiChri5
  • Members
  • 7 965 messages

Arijharn wrote...

AntiChri5 wrote...

Arijharn wrote...

Booglarize wrote...

Arijharn wrote...

To be honest, while I may be over-rationalizing here, I don't see the point of being racist, sexist or even homophobic for that matter. I just see the concept of being that moronic, essentially your cutting down 'potential friends' for no real reason.

  


Well, you could take that one step further - there's no point in imbuing any immutable difference with some kind of grand cosmic significance, to the point where you will only help people who share [immutable trait X] to the exclusion of people who don't. Cerberus's entire premise as an organization, to me, seems like one big logical misstep. 


That's true, however, Cerberus isn't anti-alien, it's just pro-human. It's not mutually exclusive. It's not like they kick Turians to the curb, it's just they have this lofty ambition of what position humanity should hold, and work tirelessly towards it.


Which just so happens to be above all Turians.....


What exactly is your point? That we shouldn't go for what we want? That we should 'mitigate' what we want/need? Why should we mitigate what we want when seemingly no-one else does?

I'm all for co-operation, but only if they want to co-operate with us. Why are you so inclined to believe out of hand that the Turians do want to bring us ("us" being humanity) closer together?

We are different. Difference will also cause points of aggression. Cerberus isn't in the public eye, and it helps defend us against those who might do us harm, without sacrificing diplomacy from the main players (aka; the System's Alliance)


My point is that you are misreading Cerberus. They do not want to make humanity strong. They want to make Humanity dominant.

#537
Kusy

Kusy
  • Members
  • 4 025 messages

Andorfiend wrote...
Unless you're going to claim that a military controled country like Burma or North Korea (...)

or Israel... sorry, that's just me being an antisemit.
Anyways. As the tile says "Their methods are extreme..." but compleatly unnecesary or even harmful to what they claim their goal is. TIM is only saying that whatever he does is for the good of humanity... I can't see how experimenting on children or even autistic children is good in any way. What good did they achive by that? They created Jack ergo - nothing good (don't be offended Jack fans, I'm talking moral value here), an antisocial individual that doesn't give a **** about preservign the humanity, instead she preffer to kill anythign she sees. What good for the humanity was achived by whiping out a whole human colony with Trashemaws? What good for the humanity was achived by Rachni experiments? None that we know of... and that gives us the impression that TIM fails everytim he claims to be halping the human race... on the other hand he's good at terrorism and unethical research for sure.

Even when it seems that Cerberus did something good - when you look closer it shows up it's not exacly that way... they evacuated a family from a colony that was a possible Collector target. Really nice, but please don't tell me an organisation that can build it's own space stations, cutting edge ships and revenants can't MAKE the god damn colonists leave the colony? Like making up something about a toxic gass or something as cliche wouldn't fend off the inhabitants actualy saving them from certain doom... that is kind of moral dilema I can talk about, but it seems it's to easy for Cerberus, they need something more controversial, like a choice between buying a beggar a meal for his whole family or killing him and his whole family so they don't have to suffer from hunger...

There's nothing that can be considered a valid argument for Cerberus being a good organisation. The fact that they fight the Reapers is RIGHT, but as such cannot make them "good". And Kelly should end up in an airlock.

#538
AntiChri5

AntiChri5
  • Members
  • 7 965 messages

Arijharn wrote...

Booglarize wrote...

Arijharn wrote...

That's true, however, Cerberus isn't anti-alien, it's just pro-human. It's not mutually exclusive. It's not like they kick Turians to the curb, it's just they have this lofty ambition of what position humanity should hold, and work tirelessly towards it.


Even if they don't go out of their way to harm non-humans,  I wouldn't consider it much of a saving grace. Take the example of non-violent racial/ethnic supremacist (or "pride") groups in today's world. Even if they don't actively harm people who are different, the ill-will they bring about and reinforce by suggesting that there's something morally significant about immutable does harm societies in very real ways. 


But how is it Cerberus' responsibility to govern how an alien species views itself in relation to humanity? Cerberus is a 'shadow organisation', what public ill-will do they generate? The Terra Firma party, is this actually 'Cerberus' (I know TIM has had a hand in deciding who runs it in the past, but that's not the same as actually running it... how many of Cerberus' agents have gone 'rogue' in the past?)? Besides, it's unlikely that will ever get anywhere because it obviously polarises many people.

I see Cerberus as being of this position: If another species wants to further their own cause, then go for it, just don't try to step on humanity because we'll step back. That's their entire policy. Honestly, how is that ideal any different from modern intelligence services?


Cerberus does not want other species to further their own goals. TIM wants humanty to be dominant.

#539
Booglarize

Booglarize
  • Members
  • 643 messages

Shandepared wrote...

Arijharn wrote...


I see Cerberus as being of this position: If another species wants to further their own cause, then go for it, just don't try to step on humanity because we'll step back. That's their entire policy. Honestly, how is that ideal any different from modern intelligence services?


It isn't any different but most people aren't intelligent enough to grasp how important those intelligence services are. Funny.


To be fair, most modern intelligence services aren't accused of the kinds of the kinds of things Cerberus has done by even the most wild-eyed of their detractors. 

Modifié par Booglarize, 30 mars 2010 - 02:31 .


#540
Guest_Shandepared_*

Guest_Shandepared_*
  • Guests

Booglarize wrote...

To be fair, most modern intelligence services aren't accused of the kinds of the kinds of things Cerberus has done by even the most wild-eyed of their detractors. 


Actually they are.

Also Cerberus wants humanity free and strong, that does imply dominence. However how is that 'wrong'? The turians, salarians, and asari are dominant. Why can't humanity be dominant too? Why must humanity stay equal or below the other big players? Here's a tip: the Council races didn't get where they are because they believed in fairness.

#541
Maria Caliban

Maria Caliban
  • Members
  • 26 094 messages

Onyx Jaguar wrote...

Well Kahouku was asking for it


He was! I'd have offed the bastard myself if I had the chance.

#542
AntiChri5

AntiChri5
  • Members
  • 7 965 messages

Shandepared wrote...

Booglarize wrote...

To be fair, most modern intelligence services aren't accused of the kinds of the kinds of things Cerberus has done by even the most wild-eyed of their detractors. 


Actually they are.

Also Cerberus wants humanity free and strong, that does imply dominence. However how is that 'wrong'? The turians, salarians, and asari are dominant. Why can't humanity be dominant too? Why must humanity stay equal or below the other big players? Here's a tip: the Council races didn't get where they are because they believed in fairness.


They want more than "free and strong" they want us to be calling the shots.

@ Caliban, your sig confused me......you do advertising now?

#543
Mallissin

Mallissin
  • Members
  • 2 040 messages

AntiChri5 wrote...

[They want more than "free and strong" they want us to be calling the shots.

@ Caliban, your sig confused me......you do advertising now?


She wants teh tokens. Precious tokens!

#544
Guest_Shandepared_*

Guest_Shandepared_*
  • Guests

AntiChri5 wrote...


They want more than "free and strong" they want us to be calling the shots.


No kidding. Being in a position will ensure that ware as free and strong as possible. Cerberus wants humanity to always achieve as much as it can. The other races aren't going to hold themselves back, there is no reason we shouldn't. If humanity were to listen to you they'd be nothing short of vassals of the big three.

#545
AntiChri5

AntiChri5
  • Members
  • 7 965 messages

Shandepared wrote...

AntiChri5 wrote...


They want more than "free and strong" they want us to be calling the shots.


No kidding. Being in a position will ensure that ware as free and strong as possible. Cerberus wants humanity to always achieve as much as it can. The other races aren't going to hold themselves back, there is no reason we shouldn't. If humanity were to listen to you they'd be nothing short of vassals of the big three.


Why is it that you can only see it as one ruling over the other? Are the Asari ruling over the Turians? Are the turians ruling over the asari? Are the asari ruling over the salarians?

#546
Booglarize

Booglarize
  • Members
  • 643 messages

Shandepared wrote...

Booglarize wrote...

To be fair, most modern intelligence services aren't accused of the kinds of the kinds of things Cerberus has done by even the most wild-eyed of their detractors. 


Actually they are.

Also Cerberus wants humanity free and strong, that does imply dominence. However how is that 'wrong'? The turians, salarians, and asari are dominant. Why can't humanity be dominant too? Why must humanity stay equal or below the other big players? Here's a tip: the Council races didn't get where they are because they believed in fairness.


You'll find the first claim a lot harder to substantiate than you might intuitively think.

As for the second, the notion of political "dominance" based on narrow identity (and narrow identity derived from immutable traits in particular) is rejected by every major political philosophy in today's world as ethically objectionable as well as highly impractical. From what I've gathered about the functionings of civilized societies in the Mass Effect universe, this aspect of politics does not appear to have changed much. 

#547
Arijharn

Arijharn
  • Members
  • 2 850 messages

AntiChri5 wrote...

Shandepared wrote...

AntiChri5 wrote...


They want more than "free and strong" they want us to be calling the shots.


No kidding. Being in a position will ensure that ware as free and strong as possible. Cerberus wants humanity to always achieve as much as it can. The other races aren't going to hold themselves back, there is no reason we shouldn't. If humanity were to listen to you they'd be nothing short of vassals of the big three.


Why is it that you can only see it as one ruling over the other? Are the Asari ruling over the Turians? Are the turians ruling over the asari? Are the asari ruling over the salarians?


Well, to be devil's advocate, the Asari do tend to culturally dominate other species.

#548
AntiChri5

AntiChri5
  • Members
  • 7 965 messages

Arijharn wrote...

AntiChri5 wrote...

Shandepared wrote...

AntiChri5 wrote...


They want more than "free and strong" they want us to be calling the shots.


No kidding. Being in a position will ensure that ware as free and strong as possible. Cerberus wants humanity to always achieve as much as it can. The other races aren't going to hold themselves back, there is no reason we shouldn't. If humanity were to listen to you they'd be nothing short of vassals of the big three.


Why is it that you can only see it as one ruling over the other? Are the Asari ruling over the Turians? Are the turians ruling over the asari? Are the asari ruling over the salarians?


Well, to be devil's advocate, the Asari do tend to culturally dominate other species.


Hah! This means Shandepard is the devil! :P.

That is a slight cultural trend, one that you probably wont see as much of on Turian and Salarian worlds.

#549
Guest_Shandepared_*

Guest_Shandepared_*
  • Guests

AntiChri5 wrote...

Why is it that you can only see it as one ruling over the other? Are the Asari ruling over the Turians? Are the turians ruling over the asari? Are the asari ruling over the salarians?


No, but if they had the opportunity to one-up the other they would take it. For the time being though the organization of the Council allowed them to keep things cool with one another whilst keeping everyone else down. I'm not against cooperation, but what I am against is fair-play. When it comes to international politics all that matters is that you win. Therefore I say we play to win.

#550
Spartas Husky

Spartas Husky
  • Members
  • 6 151 messages

Arijharn wrote...

Spartas, I totally agree. I guess people might say: 'public oversight.' But honestly, look at a state like California. Everyone wants something for good reason, but no one wants to pay the extra taxes to get it (for good reason).

I might be declared a hypocrite if I said that I support Cerberus' goals but wouldn't want to be experimented on myself and you'd be right. But people forget I think that if experimentation was the only way to ensure your safety then people most likely wouldn't be so eager to jump up and down and grab their pitchforks. It's all hypothetical



there we go..... public oversight on military or scientific operations is a waste of time period.

Why, like Ariharm wrote:

Everyone wants everything, without having to pay for it.



For example. The fact that you have freedom of speech means somebody else in the world, doesn't. Simple as that.