I honestly don't care if there's 10 gazillion other threads about this already
#226
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 07:53
FAST
****ING FAST
#227
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 07:56
#228
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 07:57
SPEEDY
ZOOM ZOOM ZOOM ZOOM
#229
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 08:25
#230
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 08:26
#231
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 09:06
Schroing wrote...
Guardian4379 wrote...
Aradace wrote...
I have to agree with the OP....As "flawed" as the Hammerhead "may" be, it is FAR superior to the Mako in terms of controlability. Anyone who actually LIKED the Mako must be masochistic bastards IMO lol.
Read: Anyone who has an opinion that differs from my own is wrong, and I shall show my displeasure by throwing baseless insults around.
Jesus Christ, the retardation in this thread is beyond comprehension. Its like a damned religion thread...
lol'd
What, because it's true?
Also, obviously they have shown their stupidity by arguing opinions as if they are somehow fact. I'm just making an observation. Next time you try to make me look like an ****, you should probably know what you're talking about.
#232
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 09:08
Guardian4379 wrote...
Schroing wrote...
Guardian4379 wrote...
Aradace wrote...
I have to agree with the OP....As "flawed" as the Hammerhead "may" be, it is FAR superior to the Mako in terms of controlability. Anyone who actually LIKED the Mako must be masochistic bastards IMO lol.
Read: Anyone who has an opinion that differs from my own is wrong, and I shall show my displeasure by throwing baseless insults around.
Jesus Christ, the retardation in this thread is beyond comprehension. Its like a damned religion thread...
lol'd
What, because it's true?
Also, obviously they have shown their stupidity by arguing opinions as if they are somehow fact. I'm just making an observation. Next time you try to make me look like an ****, you should probably know what you're talking about.
Your observation is an opinion in and of itself, and you're also portraying it as fact
#233
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 10:02
Mako and Hammerheads pro's and con's
Speed.
Mako: Slow and instant top speed on flat surfaces
Hammerhead: Reaches high speeds but with a steady acceleration which makes it alot more fun and immersive.
Weapons.
Mako: Mounted Machine Gun and a Cannon that requires aim making combat more versatile (But without the speed it makes combat seem tame)
Hammerhead: Heatseeking Missiles which dumbs down the combat completely
Resilience.
Mako: It's a f'ing tank of course it's stronger
Hammerhead: One of the biggest flaws in my oppinion was that the HH encouraged long distance combat, during the Geth incursion mission I found myself staying way back during the last two waves of geth instead of running over them with my HH (Which in a way is pretty cheap but alot of fun) and that made them completly ignore me
Missions/Maps
Mako: Clear winner
Hammerhead: ...
Conclussion:
Hammerhead with Mako weapons and maps would problably be so awesome that I would **** myself.
#234
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 11:03
Schroing wrote...
Guardian4379 wrote...
Schroing wrote...
Guardian4379 wrote...
Aradace wrote...
I have to agree with the OP....As "flawed" as the Hammerhead "may" be, it is FAR superior to the Mako in terms of controlability. Anyone who actually LIKED the Mako must be masochistic bastards IMO lol.
Read: Anyone who has an opinion that differs from my own is wrong, and I shall show my displeasure by throwing baseless insults around.
Jesus Christ, the retardation in this thread is beyond comprehension. Its like a damned religion thread...
lol'd
What, because it's true?
Also, obviously they have shown their stupidity by arguing opinions as if they are somehow fact. I'm just making an observation. Next time you try to make me look like an ****, you should probably know what you're talking about.
Your observation is an opinion in and of itself, and you're also portraying it as fact
What else would you call it, then? An intelligent conversation? I guess it could be equally possible that its mostly just trolls trolling eachother in this thread, but that does not change the fact that arguing about "which vehicle is better" is utterly foolish. It would be like arguing about which type of music is the best, or which console is the most fun to play. It's really just a matter of preference.
#235
Posté 29 mars 2010 - 03:11
TheLostGenius wrote...
GuardianAngel470 wrote...
DoNotResistHate wrote...
No we were just smart enough to know how to drive it. I think you are confusing the Mako with bad lvl design. The lvl design forcing us to climb up near vertical cliffs all the time did suck.
That being said I do like how the HH handles I just didn't like how I couldn't precision aim the main gun or how the seeking rounds often veered off the target you were trying to hit just to miss a target somewhere else. Some shields on it would have been nice as well.
And Bucky you are the one grasping at straws bro. Your assuming the engine operates in some completely non obvious fashion. When the reality is that a fan is shaped like that for one reason and one reason only slicing through air. Not slicing through the vacuum of space or blowing space vacuum on the rest of the engine to cool it down. You are smart enough to know that there is nothing to blow on the engine in space. The shear fact that it is a fan means that it was designed to interact with atmosphere in some way, shape or form. Just be a man suck it up and admit it's a goof and move on.
And they call me a minority. This is what I've been saying Kraidy and I'm not alone.
The truth is that the player was too lazy to find the intended path to get to the marked object. Instead the player would try to follow a straightline path to the map marker, often sending the player across jagged surfaces that were not optimal for reaching the destination.
Ya I have said as much in other threads. In his defense though the paths where often not obvious. Like it would curve off to the left and you needed to go right. But I agree if you were thorough you could almost always find an easy path.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut






