What if Reapers are right?
#26
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 08:41
Seriously, cruc1al is pretty much spot on.
#27
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 08:42
#28
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 08:48
#29
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 08:51
Edit: I hate saying "we". Why do we have to say "we"? It's like if you're white you have to say it. "We" killed the Indians and the buffalo, "we" enslaved the blacks.
"We" did not do sh*t, okay?! I wasn't there, damn it. I think I'd remember throwing smallpox blankets on Native Americans, thank you.
I recycle. I'm part of the humane society. I use energy saving light bulbs and when I see a turtle in the road I pull over and carry it gently to safety, what more do you want from me?! I'm sorry!!
Modifié par Nightwriter, 28 mars 2010 - 09:13 .
#30
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 08:57
Guest_Shandepared_*
Nightwriter wrote...
Yeah. And we slaughtered the Native Americans to bring "enlightenment" to the new world.
You can't argue with results. If not for us the Americas would still be in the stone-age. Progress can be painful.
#31
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 08:59
Shandepared wrote...
Nightwriter wrote...
Yeah. And we slaughtered the Native Americans to bring "enlightenment" to the new world.
You can't argue with results. If not for us the Americas would still be in the stone-age. Progress can be painful.
You sound like TIM. However, TIM would also say: "You and I have different methods, but I can't argue with your results." It's TIM's methods that are fked up.
#32
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 09:02
We've done quite well progressing technologically without having to kill ourselves. Progress =/= improvement. "Progress" to indigenous cultures often means death, disease, and sorrow.Shandepared wrote...
Nightwriter wrote...
Yeah. And we slaughtered the Native Americans to bring "enlightenment" to the new world.
You can't argue with results. If not for us the Americas would still be in the stone-age. Progress can be painful.
#33
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 09:05
Guest_Shandepared_*
Collider wrote...
We've done quite well progressing technologically without having to kill ourselves. Progress =/= improvement. "Progress" to indigenous cultures often means death, disease, and sorrow.
...and yet without it they would never advance. Too bad for them, they should have advanced on their own. Modern civilization as we know it today would not exist if not for the conquest of the Americas.
#34
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 09:11
#35
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 09:14
Guest_Shandepared_*
Collider wrote...
You don't think the natives were perfectly content to have their level of technology?
They seemed eager enough to make use of the white man's tools.
#36
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 09:16
Doesn't matter. They often used the "white" man's tools against the "white" man too. If I have a spear and you have a laser gun, I'm going to use the laser gun. Either way, a lot of innocent people died over encroachment and settlement.Shandepared wrote...
Collider wrote...
You don't think the natives were perfectly content to have their level of technology?
They seemed eager enough to make use of the white man's tools.
#37
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 09:18
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
#38
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 09:19
on topic: as people said before, who would want to be a milkshake?
#39
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 09:20
Shandepared wrote...
Nightwriter wrote...
Yeah. And we slaughtered the Native Americans to bring "enlightenment" to the new world.
You can't argue with results. If not for us the Americas would still be in the stone-age. Progress can be painful.
Does progress really help? Native American civilization probably would have lasted longer than we will, some geologists say that oil could run out in 30 years.
#40
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 09:21
#41
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 09:23
Collider wrote...
You don't think the natives were perfectly content to have their level of technology? I mean, aren't you content with the level of technology you have in your culture (internet?). If an advance alien civilization came to earth an enslaved earth with the excuse of civilizing barbarians, and people started dying left and right of disease and war, would you have the same sentiment?
He speaks sense. [assuming a default gender there]
Besides, to say committing gross wrongs is necessary for the sake of progress is a cheap answer. If we have come no farther than we were then - if we cannot learn to advance and grow as a species without committing genocide on our own race - we are not improving, and we are not becoming better.
#42
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 09:25
#43
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 09:28
Nightwriter wrote...
Besides, to say committing gross wrongs is necessary for the sake of progress is a cheap answer.
Yes. To quote paragon Shepard, "there is always a better way."
#44
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 09:30
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
Prognosticators have been saying this bs for the last 100 years.bobobo878 wrote...
Does progress really help? Native American civilization probably would have lasted longer than we will, some geologists say that oil could run out in 30 years.
#45
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 09:36
Collider wrote...
Indeed. I think our outlook is becoming increasingly better. True, we do have nuclear weapons, but we have so many safeguards now whereas in the past the only limit to suffering was the whim of tyrants and kings.
What was it Martin Luther King said? "The arc of history bends slowly, but it bends toward justice".
We change slowly, but we change for the better.
#46
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 09:41
JohnnyDollar wrote...
Prognosticators have been saying this bs for the last 100 years.bobobo878 wrote...
Does progress really help? Native American civilization probably would have lasted longer than we will, some geologists say that oil could run out in 30 years.
Relevance? 0. Prognosticators =/= geologists.
#47
Guest_Shandepared_*
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 09:43
Guest_Shandepared_*
Collider wrote...
Doesn't matter. They often used the "white" man's tools against the "white" man too. If I have a spear and you have a laser gun, I'm going to use the laser gun. Either way, a lot of innocent people died over encroachment and settlement.
A lot of innocent people died when the Romans invaded the British Isles as well.
#48
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 09:45
And? Invasions typically cause deaths.Shandepared wrote...
Collider wrote...
Doesn't matter. They often used the "white" man's tools against the "white" man too. If I have a spear and you have a laser gun, I'm going to use the laser gun. Either way, a lot of innocent people died over encroachment and settlement.
A lot of innocent people died when the Romans invaded the British Isles as well.
#49
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 09:46
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
Being in a particular occupation does not exclude one from being a Prognosticator.cruc1al wrote...
JohnnyDollar wrote...
Prognosticators have been saying this bs for the last 100 years.bobobo878 wrote...
Does progress really help? Native American civilization probably would have lasted longer than we will, some geologists say that oil could run out in 30 years.
Relevance? 0. Prognosticators =/= geologists.
Modifié par JohnnyDollar, 28 mars 2010 - 09:48 .
#50
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 09:47





Retour en haut






