GothamLord wrote...
GuardianAngel470 wrote...
1. You're going to have to explain your opinion on death, sorry
2.In what way is she mentally unstable? Do you mean an experience kind of unstable ie abuse or do you mean biologically, ie Bipolar
3.I can see the sympathy reasoning and I agree with it mostly, however I'm an actions person, I think a person's actions should dictate how they are treated. I couldn't care less if someone pictures cutting open dogs and messing with their insides, as long as they don't do it. Now that doesn't mean I think a person's actions define them, quite the reverse. It is what people do when no one is watching and the things that go on in their heads that define them
4.Evil is a strange thing. Everybody uses it, but never correctly. Point me at a single person who has committed atrocities and I can usually say that they aren't evil. An evil person does something because they know it will hurt others and for no other reason. By that logic, Hitler and Mao weren't evil, just misguided. Stalin may have been evil, but I don't know enough about him to make a judgment. I don't think morinth was necessarily evil, she didn't kill to hurt people, she killed for herself, making her incredibly selfish. Despite this, I still think she deserved to die because as I said above, the actions a person makes define how I treat them, and Morinth killed thousands, making her worthy of death
1. Take her in to custody. Put her on whatever neural mods or medication she needs to drop her biotics through the basement floor and say will you submit to the isolation now or not. If she refuses, off with her head or whatever means of justice that Asari justice deems fit. Morinth is on Omega and Samara is under oath to me before her Asari Code of Kill my daughter to clear my own conscience. Her ability to claim anything "Asari" takes priority is moot.
2. Yes Morinth is unstable. Mentally and biologically. Her genetic mutation combined with giving into the *urge* for 400 years as turned her into a addict that doesnt view life the same way anymore. Again the vampire comparison comes into consideration as she views her victims as nothing more than you or I would view a bucket of fried chicken. It just talks to use about music of art for a couple of dates over drinks before we eat it.
3. Our actions do define us. As do our thoughts. We do one thing and say another we are either a hypocrite or a liar. We think about wearing someones intestines as a hat more than a few times we're probably mentally unstable.
4. I'll avoid responding to much responding here to avoid the Godwin Law and the mention of Hitler etc. But *evil* as a true definition is a funny thing. Evil and things like right or wrong is the course of human history seem to vary. History tends to be written by the winner.
I still don't agree with taking her into custody, but I can understand the samara angle, I was a little perturbed by that as well. I mean, she is doing something righteous by stopping a serial killer but at the same time her justification is a little skewed. The only thing I can explain it with is maybe Morinth's first kill was samara's lover, thus giving her a reason to go through the justicar training. Her lover is never mentioned which leaves that possibility. For me I'm a fairly forgiving person...until you do something unforgivable like attack me or my family. Then I become quite ruthless. Morinth did something unforgivable, and no amount of persuasion can change that. She is solely responsible for the deaths of thousands, and not for moral or respectable reasons like "they got in my way". She killed them because it made her feel good, and she did this for 400 years.
You still didn't get my mental health point, I was talking about biologically unstable, like a hereditary disease that afflicts mental health. I never heard the game say that she was mentally unstable as a result of her condition, just that she didn't have a fully developed empathy response. Serial killers in the Real world work in a similar way. It can be argued that Serial killers aren't unstable, they are always in full control of their actions, just not fully developed.
And your Evil point is also valid, I was using my own definition of evil, from the standpoint of believing that it is the things you do when you are alone and the things you think that define you. Other people (namely my parents) will have the belief that it is their actions that define them, in which case Hitler and Mao are evil. It's all subjective and no one is right or wrong on the matter.
Modifié par GuardianAngel470, 29 mars 2010 - 06:23 .