Don't be an idiot.
The Spamming Troll part 2 said...
ive responded to every post in here about husks being humans.
No, you have not. You've only responded to those whose words you could warp to fit your agenda, which appears to be stirring discussion on a non-issue. Whenever this was brought up, you pointedly ignored it. Every single time. Why would you do that, if you made an effort to respond at all, hmm?
i dont live and breath "defending" my concern about husks actually being humans.
Which is a non-issue, as noted. Again, your failure to address this at all smacks of your being disingenuous.
really, do you know what your talking about? or did you just read the last 4 posts and say "hey im gonna write some hate about theOP becasue i am so smart
I read the entire topic. How else would I be able to tell of your posting behavior here?
As for 'hate' bit: there's only as much you think there is, which I think is entirely an illusion of yours. Hate is an "intense animosity or dislike; an object of detestation or hatred". I do not hold that against you. Calling you a troll is not an example of such. It's a convenient label for individuals such as yourself who post on forums to rile up the population on trivial or pointless issues.
"...and i know everything about mass effect and i totally knew husks were
humans. the OP is such an idiot for not knowing that."
No kidding I knew husks were humans - this is
pointed out to you the first time you run into them. In fact, this revelation is inseparable from your first encounter with them, because it's how they're introduced. This obvious fact makes is part of what makes it hard for anyone to take you seriously. Add to that your failure to address anyone pointing this out, indicates dishonesty. If your reasons for this thread were honorable, you should have at least told those saying your viewpoint held no merit to get lost.
i love the fact that my screen name drives all you fools against me for no reason other then the fact that my screen name has the word troll in it.
Hmm, I haven't said anything about your screen name. Perhaps you're confusing me with a couple others who have pointed out your act.
Oh, I see - you're lumping me with them. Disappointed in you, sir.

Now that you brought it up, though, I have to say that the name doesn't help your cause any, considering the nature of this topic.
if you dont have a comment related to this topic, then arent you in fact being the so called troll?
I don't need to comment on this topic. I've already pointed out how stupid/pointless it is. Why would I bother if I happen to believe this? I'm here to warn others of you.
do you get off on calling people trolls? is that your fancy???
No, I do not. Where do you get your evidence from? Have you been monitoring how I spend my time online?
All jokes aside, Bioware's forums seem to have problems with them. Too many people, not enough moderation. Hence the fact that many people around these here parts are a little jumpy when it comes to trolling.
why do i have to defend my topic at all? this is a great concern to me.
Because it's stupid? It addresses an issue that's made glaringly obvious the first time it's raised in the first game? Your topic's name is an obvious fact. Then, your opening post is just a rant, with no avenue for discussion other than asking if people had thought about it. Y'know, the obvious. Followed by a wish to get back at the Reapers, conveniently ignoring the second obvious fact about husks: they're
dead human beings. So what's the problem?
Numerous posters touched on this. One even was even so direct as to point out how trivial it was. You ignored them every time, or warped what they said to advance your agenda ( which I've already pointed out earlier) and keep the topic running. You even attempted to change the topic halfway through to talk about the human Reaper, another non-issue, when someone brought it up.
That's classic troll behavior, sir. If you want to be taken seriously, I challenge you to answer the question of why you believe this to be an ethical dilemma at all (as was implied in your opening post) instead of evading it and answering whoever suits you.
Modifié par CTM1, 01 avril 2010 - 03:32 .