TJSolo wrote...
Bigeyez wrote...
TJSolo wrote...
Bigeyez wrote...
It's funny how people keep coming up with "comparisons" that are nothing like whats happening here.
"You'd complain about free tires that break!"
"You'd complain about a free slap to the face!"
"You'd complain about a free pile of **** on your hands!"
What, is this thread a reunion of Strawman arguements R Us or something?
Yes people getting mediocore free DLC is completely equal to getting faulty tires which could kill you, a slap to the face which would hurt you, and someone ****ting on you, which some freaky people might find sexy. Mhm. Flawless internet logic at work.
The logic that is spawned from "it is free so don't complain" is a direct reflection of the fallacy of that statement.
Any logic can be "proven flawed" if taken to stupid extremes. Case in point, Glen Beck. From the looks of it you guys suscribe to his tactic of making strawman arguments and taking points to their extremes in order to "prove" your points.
People are talking about a DLC pack for a VIDEOGAME and yet you and others are trying to equate that to possible death, bodily harm, and someone taking a crap on you.
Whats next, "If someone offered to murder your family for free, you'd complain!".
Seriously, it's perfectly fine to complain about the DLC being ****ty. The point is you all are acting is if Bioware walked over to your mother's house and pimped slapped the snot out of her. There are already a ton of threads on the topic and instead of continuing a discussion of one of those here is yet another thread on the same damn thing. Maybe if you guys voiced your complaints in a form other then "zomgz bioware suxzors and leik EA is the evil empire and they betrayed us!!!!111!" You'd get more positive responses from people.
Oh the irony of taking examples to extremes, slippery slope logic wants to greet you.
The examples given were to show the fault in the reasoning process, most of them are not even extremes.
The "it is free , so don't complain" is horrible reasoning period.
The topic is the firewalker being poor content, with various points. If something is wrong with the points bring attention to that. Being over zealous about logical fallacies is silly and makes one prone to committing them.
Heh I'm just applying the same "logic" that has been used repeatedly thorughout this thread.
Comparing VIDEOGAME DLC, let me stress that V I D E O G A M E D L C, to getting faulty tires on your car, getting slapped in the face, and someone taking a **** on you isn't taking something to an extreme??? Really?
Again, if the complaints were made in a more reasonable way and not in repeated threads over and over then maybe people would be more prone to having a discussion and actually talking about the many flaws the DLC does have. But you can't expect anyone to take you seriously when you all are trying to compare this to extreme situations like the tires/slap/**** scenarios that people have given.
Edit: In an effort to actually discuss the topic, I have to say that the only really fun thing I found with the Firewalker pack was the HH itself. It was a blast to drive around and control. My only complaints with the vehicle itself are the missile launcher which is inaccurate and doesn't really even head for the target your aiming at sometimes and the fact that the tank seems to be made of tissue paper, especially on Insanity.
The missions themselves were boring, extremely linear, dull, and the story was pretty much not there at all. They were all incredibly short and left me wanting for more time in the HH. Ideally in real exploration, not what basically amounts to a corridor with enemies like these missions are.
Modifié par Bigeyez, 29 mars 2010 - 08:48 .