Oh, and there is no such thing as a respectable news agencies, they have all become like paparazzi. Which I hate. Just find the one you agree with more and find particular programs that are less bias/more fair than others. It's that or just rely on the internet for your news.
Bioware: "Mass Effect sex scandal 'embarrassed' Fox News"
Débuté par
shinobi602
, mars 30 2010 06:50
-
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut
#177
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
Posté 31 mars 2010 - 01:45
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
-
- Guests
That is all subjective and it swings both ways. If you honestly don't think other news agencies ambush or engage in a combative manner, then you are as gullible as you claim others to be.Maestro975 wrote...
JohnnyDollar wrote...
And if anyone truly believes that not all news organizations operate in a similar way then,Maestro975 wrote...
Raygereio wrote...
There's a difference between objectively providing both sides to an argument and outright lying to promote your own opinion.JohnnyDollar wrote...
The fact that people are so vocal regarding their dislike or hatred of Fox News only provides that much more evidence that their needs to be both sides presented in the media. Not just one side.
Here here. The Fox News credo is "Journalistic integrity doesn't pay the rent."
Here's something from another VG that sums up Fox News perfectly:
(A scientist is mentioning a series of unethical experiments done by her company)
REPORTER: I take it you have proof?
SCIENTIST: Yes. I have conducted numerous experients..
REPORTER: So YOU conducted these experiements.
SCIENTIST: Yes...
REPORTER: It's a story I've seen a dozen times, a young woman, frustrated by her inability to sleep her way to the top, turns to mad science to gain her revenge, framing an innocent corporation for her horrible crimes.
Seriously, anyone who truly believes that Fox News doesn't operate that way is a gullible idiot.
a.) They have no other argument and or
b.) They are unable to look
at different media organizations and compare them objectively
and or
c.)
They see Fox news as a threat because they share the opposite ideology.
Press Accuracy Rating Hits Two-Decade Low
Public Evaluations of the
News Media: 1985-2009
Pew Research Center Publications
http://pewresearch.o...-two-decade-low
Pew
Research Center Topics.
Publications on News Media.
http://pewresearch.o...pics/newsmedia/
In the particular example that I give, a news organization that is NOT Fox News would not ambush the scientist in such a combative, sensationalistic manner. They would either interview her in a civil, professional manner, or they wouldn't touch the story with a 10 foot pole.
Respectable news agencies also generally don't hire nutjobs who think that McCarthyism and/or turning back the clock to the J. Edgar Hoover era are good things.
Respectable agencies also shouldn't hire Communist sympathizers with Marxist beliefs that think that failed social policies should be instituted and/or ressurected either IMO. The left wing news agencies hire lefties for the most part and right wing news agencies hire righties for the most part.
Modifié par JohnnyDollar, 31 mars 2010 - 01:53 .
#178
Posté 31 mars 2010 - 02:04
Urazz
-
- Members
- 2 445 messages
And the others are just argruing that Fox is alot worse than them at that stuff. I don't think anyone was arguing that the other stations aren't that way too but that Fox is worse.GuardianAngel470 wrote...
You guys really aren't listening to Johnny. You keep saying that Fox is Bias and all that, and he keeps agreeing with you, but you won't listen. And BS the other new agencies don't ambush people, that's called investigative journalism, it was invented by them. All three major news agencies are Bias, just in different ways. They all have people that insult others and their guests, they all have straight news programs, they all have fair news casters. They are all the same, except for perspective. That is what Johnny is saying.
