Nice Futurama reference but your not on the moon...
Motivationals
#4501
Posté 18 mai 2010 - 03:55
#4502
Posté 18 mai 2010 - 04:25
#4503
Posté 18 mai 2010 - 05:18
LiquidGrape wrote...
Where on earth did you get this picture?
... and can I get it without the black bar?
#4504
Posté 18 mai 2010 - 05:23
I presume that someone created this by hacking the Liara model from the ME1 love scene and pasting it onto a screen of the bed. I also presume that there is nothing under the black bar, as putting something there that would never be seen would be a waste of money.Orion1836 wrote...
LiquidGrape wrote...
Where on earth did you get this picture?
... and can I get it without the black bar?
#4505
Posté 18 mai 2010 - 05:29
Modifié par Orion1836, 18 mai 2010 - 05:29 .
#4506
Posté 18 mai 2010 - 06:07
#4507
Posté 18 mai 2010 - 06:44
#4508
Posté 18 mai 2010 - 07:34
RenownedRyan wrote...
][/url]
So he IS a male model.... Whodda thunk it..... I still think he is butt *** ugly.....
#4509
Posté 18 mai 2010 - 08:29
#4510
Posté 18 mai 2010 - 08:43
bobobo878 wrote...
I presume that someone created this by hacking the Liara model from the ME1 love scene and pasting it onto a screen of the bed. I also presume that there is nothing under the black bar, as putting something there that would never be seen would be a waste of money.Orion1836 wrote...
LiquidGrape wrote...
[Image Snip]
Where on earth did you get this picture?
... and can I get it without the black bar?
Actually, it's just a simply noclip command during the love scene.
And there's something underneath the bar alright; but not anything that should be seen here.
Think of the children!
#4511
Posté 18 mai 2010 - 11:18
#4512
Posté 18 mai 2010 - 11:27
Xan Kreigor Mk2 wrote...
there should be no children here, this is an m-rated series.
Then why does Casey Hudson claim they wanted to make this a PG-13 friendly series?
Oh, the contradictions...
Modifié par LiquidGrape, 18 mai 2010 - 11:27 .
#4513
Posté 18 mai 2010 - 03:30
LiquidGrape wrote...
Xan Kreigor Mk2 wrote...
there should be no children here, this is an m-rated series.
Then why does Casey Hudson claim they wanted to make this a PG-13 friendly series?
Oh, the contradictions...
Well, there are no nipples in that shot, just boobage, so I think it's still 'PG-13' as these movies can show just about every part of the boob, except the nips. Boobs are fine and dandy until someone shows a nipple (I'm looking at you Janet Jackson!)
#4514
Posté 18 mai 2010 - 03:40
jlb524 wrote...
Well, there are no nipples in that shot, just boobage, so I think it's still 'PG-13' as these movies can show just about every part of the boob, except the nips. Boobs are fine and dandy until someone shows a nipple (I'm looking at you Janet Jackson!)
Of course! The corrupting areola! Why didn't I think of that?
Thanks for clearing that up.
Oh, and to stay somewhat on-topic:
Modifié par LiquidGrape, 18 mai 2010 - 03:44 .
#4515
Posté 18 mai 2010 - 03:44
LiquidGrape wrote...
jlb524 wrote...
Well, there are no nipples in that shot, just boobage, so I think it's still 'PG-13' as these movies can show just about every part of the boob, except the nips. Boobs are fine and dandy until someone shows a nipple (I'm looking at you Janet Jackson!)
Of course! The corrupting areola! Why didn't I think of that?
Thanks for clearing that up.
It's just female nipples though...they are evil. Male nipples are fine.
Yes, that Benezia pic proves my point!
Modifié par jlb524, 18 mai 2010 - 03:45 .
#4516
Posté 18 mai 2010 - 03:57
jlb524 wrote...
It's just female nipples though...they are evil. Male nipples are fine.
Yes, that Benezia pic proves my point!
And that's not even the one example there is.
#4517
Posté 18 mai 2010 - 04:15
The Unquiet Dead wrote...
#4518
Posté 18 mai 2010 - 04:27
jlb524 wrote...
LiquidGrape wrote...
jlb524 wrote...
Well, there are no nipples in that shot, just boobage, so I think it's still 'PG-13' as these movies can show just about every part of the boob, except the nips. Boobs are fine and dandy until someone shows a nipple (I'm looking at you Janet Jackson!)
Of course! The corrupting areola! Why didn't I think of that?
Thanks for clearing that up.
It's just female nipples though...they are evil. Male nipples are fine.
But showing female nipples in a Mature-rated game is fine. . . as long as they are ugly. Just look at the Broodmother. Really. the rules about nipples in games are quite complicated. You could write a book about it.
#4519
Posté 18 mai 2010 - 04:41
julian08 wrote...
But showing female nipples in a Mature-rated game is fine. . . as long as they are ugly. Just look at the Broodmother. Really. the rules about nipples in games are quite complicated. You could write a book about it.
That's the thing, isn't it? Evil characters are free to expose theirs, because it's established that they are, indeed, evil characters.
Righteous characters on the other hand, cover theirs.
...I could write a masters thesis on this.
Modifié par LiquidGrape, 18 mai 2010 - 04:41 .
#4520
Posté 18 mai 2010 - 05:09
The Unquiet Dead wrote...
Good grief, that made me cackle like an idiot. Excellent work.
#4521
Posté 18 mai 2010 - 05:39
Meshakhad2 wrote...


Come on baby... don't fear the reaper
Baby take my hand... don't fear the reaper
We'll be able to fl... uh wha?
Oh yeah, good songB)
#4522
Posté 18 mai 2010 - 06:09

Modifié par JediHealerCosmin, 18 mai 2010 - 06:13 .
#4523
Posté 18 mai 2010 - 06:13
Wait, we’re not suppose to hit them.JediHealerCosmin wrote...
![]()
#4524
Posté 18 mai 2010 - 06:22
I wishnhsk wrote...
Just to sum up my day... gah
#4525
Posté 18 mai 2010 - 06:23
JediHealerCosmin wrote...
![]()
Where's this shot from?






Retour en haut











