CmdrFenix83 wrote...
False. Legion was *supposedly* there trying to get intel on Reaper systems to attempt to understand this virus. Nothing to do with destroying it.
How did he learn about this virus anyway? It's not something the 'Heretics' would have shared, and no organic would have known. Did Legion, in his quest for Shepard stumble onto some 'Heretic' station and hack it and find the details there?
You're being purposely ignorant. You ignore any evidence for Legion's loyalty and try to spin it against him using flimsy logical fallacies like 'he COULD be evil' and 'That's what he was SUPPOSEDLY doing'. There's no point having this discussion if you're purposely remain ignorant and convince yourself that Legion is anything other than some unfeeling killing machine of death.
Why would he not know about the virus? It's a pretty significant factor and if you actually paid attention to him, you'd know he didn't find this information himself. Rather, the geth did and he was sent to acquire intelligence on it. You're acting like the geth are completely oblivious and to be honest, it'd really just be a matter of acquiring a Heretic geth's data core likewise to how Tali hacked a geth's data core to get out that evidence against Saren, and considering the geth understand their technology a hell of a lot more than anyone else, it's safe to say they know how to do it without damaging the contents of the data.
It's pretty clear that they're acquiring intelligence on the virus to combat it, why else would they need it? They're hardly capable of using it on anyone else, considering computer viruses are incapable of affecting organics, surprisingly enough. And if they were doing it for some ulterior purpose, why would they later use that information to either rewrite the heretics or destroy them (a choice he let SHEPARD make). You still haven't addressed the inherent ridiculousness in the overly elaborate and hilarious hoax theory that the geth would sacrifice inordinate amount of resources and millions of geth JUST to convince Commander Shepard.
Stop saying 'could' because that's not proof of anything. Rome 'could' have avoided it's fall, North Korea 'could' succeed in nuking their neighbours, anything 'could' happen. But we don't deal with 'coulds' or 'maybes'. We deal with truth and what's happened. Plain and simple.
But I don't see the point of arguing this, because you'll either backpedal and put up a strawman or continue to go 'can you PROVE it?' which is kinda funny considering I could ask you the same questions regarding your accusations.
Honestly, I've had enough of your disingeneous assertions.
Modifié par Cascadus, 01 avril 2010 - 04:46 .