When is Bioware going to offer us a service as useful as this?
Blizzard vs Bioware...
#1
Posté 01 avril 2010 - 09:29
When is Bioware going to offer us a service as useful as this?
#2
Posté 01 avril 2010 - 09:40
#3
Posté 01 avril 2010 - 09:47
Though it would be funny if you are a guy and you find this one really nice female, only to later find out he is a guy.... unless you are gay of course, then have fun.
#4
Posté 01 avril 2010 - 10:02
As above: Bioware > Blizzard
#5
Posté 01 avril 2010 - 10:03
#6
Posté 01 avril 2010 - 10:06
#7
Posté 01 avril 2010 - 10:06
#8
Posté 01 avril 2010 - 10:08
#9
Posté 01 avril 2010 - 10:15
Mitchmcn wrote...
Come to think of it, this is a poor question to ask on a Bioware site lol
Ask anywhere neutral like IGN or GameFAQs, and I guarantee that the answer will be Bioware.
As another poster said, Blizzard is all flash, no substance.
#10
Posté 01 avril 2010 - 10:16
#11
Posté 01 avril 2010 - 10:33
But...
You have to admire the way Blizzard work. They've taken 12 years to put out a sequel to their most popular game. You can't accuse them of rushing out products to cash in. You'd never see them putting out an unfinished game (ME2) or a lacklustre expansion (Awakenings).
#12
Posté 01 avril 2010 - 10:38
Maybe you guys should actually click on the link and check it out before getting all serious and posting presumptuous comments.
#13
Posté 01 avril 2010 - 10:40
#14
Posté 01 avril 2010 - 10:41
WilliamShatner wrote...
BioWare would win simply because they have several games that are among my favourite of all time. Blizzard doesn't have any.
But...
You have to admire the way Blizzard work. They've taken 12 years to put out a sequel to their most popular game. You can't accuse them of rushing out products to cash in. You'd never see them putting out an unfinished game (ME2) or a lacklustre expansion (Awakenings).
Certainly the polish everything they ever make to the ultimate sort of luster. That IS without a doubt blizzard's stock and trade. But it's still ultimately soulless, without character, and their RPG's (using that term LOOSELY) offer absolutely nothing in terms of narrative to ever keep you on board. While I for one think the assertions that ME2 is "unfinished" or that Awakenings is "lacklustre" are somewhat unfounded I would still prefer a slightly pock-mocked Bioware experience with all of its narrative depth, well-rounded characters, and well-written storylines than the most polished yet ultimately shallow experience a blizzard "rpg" offers.
That's just me though.
Modifié par andnico, 01 avril 2010 - 10:41 .
#15
Posté 01 avril 2010 - 11:01
Also: social.bioware.com/brc/683119
#16
Posté 01 avril 2010 - 11:04
Meglivorn wrote...
Some people doesn't realize it (was) April 1. And Blizzard usually goes wacky that dayFull of sillyness
THANK you. Sheesh.
#17
Posté 01 avril 2010 - 11:07
Personally for April fools I called up my mother and told her I had finally found a job. She was so happy . . . and then of course the inevitable followed.
We're not on speaking terms now.
Modifié par thegreateski, 01 avril 2010 - 11:08 .
#18
Posté 01 avril 2010 - 11:21
andnico wrote...
WilliamShatner wrote...
BioWare would win simply because they have several games that are among my favourite of all time. Blizzard doesn't have any.
But...
You have to admire the way Blizzard work. They've taken 12 years to put out a sequel to their most popular game. You can't accuse them of rushing out products to cash in. You'd never see them putting out an unfinished game (ME2) or a lacklustre expansion (Awakenings).
Certainly the polish everything they ever make to the ultimate sort of luster. That IS without a doubt blizzard's stock and trade. But it's still ultimately soulless, without character, and their RPG's (using that term LOOSELY) offer absolutely nothing in terms of narrative to ever keep you on board. While I for one think the assertions that ME2 is "unfinished" or that Awakenings is "lacklustre" are somewhat unfounded I would still prefer a slightly pock-mocked Bioware experience with all of its narrative depth, well-rounded characters, and well-written storylines than the most polished yet ultimately shallow experience a blizzard "rpg" offers.
That's just me though.
Apples and oranges.
I prefer Blizzards RTSs but the narrow minded elitism regarding what makes an "RPG" tires me. Some RPGs concentrate on story and characters, some focused on action and loot, some mix up them. Live and let live. Neither is less valid than the other nor are the fans of the games, and Blizzard give their fans what they want they .
As someone who is a fan of BioWare's (general) emphasis on story and character I have been disappointed by their past two efforts. The sheity in games from a company that espouses the virtue of storytelling is
unbelievable. ME2 was clearly unfinished as evidenced by the DLC they have attached to the game post release. It was given a release date and the making of the
game was moulded to make that date. Blizzard wouldn't put up with any
of that nonsense.
Awakenings in terms of an expansion doesn't come close to the WoW expansions (and I'm not even a fan of WoW). The WoW expansions are of the same quality as the original game, just smaller. Awakenings is not just a smaller version of DA:O, but the quality severely declined and several of the best elements of DA:O have been gutted or completely removed. Apparently to cut costs and deliver the game on time. Again something Blizzard would not do.
#19
Posté 01 avril 2010 - 11:21
#20
Guest_justinnstuff_*
Posté 01 avril 2010 - 11:31
Guest_justinnstuff_*
#21
Posté 01 avril 2010 - 11:33
Bioware also makes good games that are quite fun to play repeatedly but they have better stories than Blizzard's games but they lack in the multiplayer department (they really don't have any).
Essentially, I tie both companies in making fun games that are fun to play repeatedly but Blizzard wins at the better multiplayer aspects to their game and patching service to fix problems/balance more often. Bioware makes greater stories and would probably do decently at multiplayer if they actually really did it.
#22
Posté 01 avril 2010 - 11:39
#23
Posté 01 avril 2010 - 11:48
In a point for point comparison, keep in mind that Blizzard focuses on, balances for, and optimizes the multiplayer experience over the single player.
However, I also think it's fair to say that saying they don't write compelling stories at Blizzard is inaccurate. Warcraft, Starcraft, and Diablo all have a very rich mythos attached to them and are well-written.
Bioware, on the other hand, writes some of the best storylines in the business, but hasn't pushed for very strong multiplayer gameplay.
All of the people I know who play PC or console games have logged hundreds of hours on products from both companies.
What we have yet to see is how well Bioware will do jumping into a new genre of product, but their track record is stellar, as is Blizzard's. I have no doubt that both companies will continue to dominate sales and generate critical acclaim.
#24
Posté 02 avril 2010 - 12:07
#25
Posté 02 avril 2010 - 12:59
Meglivorn wrote...
Some people doesn't realize it (was) April 1. And Blizzard usually goes wacky that dayFull of sillyness
Ya I forgot about that when I looked at it, though I admoit I only glanced at it for a moment. Need to stay away from the Internet on april 1st.





Retour en haut






