For story reasons, I thought a female dwarf commoner (i.e. Rica's younger sister) was "better" than a male dwarf commoner. For similar story (role-playing) reasons, I thought that given Rica's experiences (and Leske's later betrayal of the PC - unspoken but clear implication they were an "item", I thought) that the character of Rica's younger sister might be inclined not to engage in any romance beyond flirting at the most, with any NPC within the relatively short time frame of DA:O.
Of the endings (throne room discussion) and epilogues I've played and/or read, dwarf commoner is my favourite. Unfortunately, I doubt there would be any related dialogue with Sigrun in Awakenings (just as there wasn't with Anders with a mage PC who had freed the circle from the templars).
Similarly, I thought a female city elf makes a better story than a male (slight difference in the origin story I think b/w being rescued and fighting out vs. attempting rescue) and given that origin (including rape of one cousin and murder of another, death of your husband-to-be albeit arranged, the character dies helping to rescue your character), there would similarly in my view be a disinclination to engage in romance with anyone in the short term.
In other words, just don't carry on a romance = solution to OP's problem so long as it makes "sense" to you.
Or, it might be that while I thought a female dwarf commoner (or female city elf) was better for story reasons, as a male I had problems with "my" character engaging in a romance as a female and so wanted a "good" reason/justification to avoid such...[grin]
Modifié par epeeist, 03 avril 2010 - 01:14 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut










