jlb524 wrote...
They're not obligated to provide us with anything, but we're asking for it b/c we want it.
Well that's obvious.
We're angry b/c they are giving us B.S. reasons for why this wasn't included.
What do you expect from a business? Being terribly honest about EVERYTHING they are asked is not sound commercially. It is very typical and standard for businesses to lie and hide things from their audience. You can expect it from just about any company of any significant size. Why does it matter if you know their reasoning? They are also not obligated to lay their heart out on a table for you to examine. I also basically got the impression from this interview that they basically said that some characters are bisexual, some are not. Is that not good enough for you?
I think the negative far outweighs the positive. Kelly is not positive...just look at how's she's treated on these forums.
Did you do her romance? How she's treated in the forums should not matter to you, use your own judgment rather than the judgment of others if you haven't done so. I highly doubt that her romance is as despicable as some say. It's just popular to denounce her for some reason.
Liara is from ME1 and her romantic content in ME2 was just about nil.
Still positive.
The Samara romance fell flat.
Just because the romance did not progress does not mean it was not a positive rendition of lesbian relations. If you are not talking about that in regards to saying positive versus negative, then reclarify.
I'll admit in the past BW did a good job with homosexual romances and content. I am only critiquing the current direction they seem to be going with this. This has nothing to do with there past games that featured homosexual content (JE, ME1, DA).
??? Their current is direction is FANTASTIC. Look at their older games and then look at their newer, you will see that their games are becoming much much more accessible for LGBT players. I don't get the outcry over one single game.