258292 réponses à ce sujet

[JeanLuc761]

Alphyn wrote...

JeanLuc761 wrote...

Very, very well. 

Glad to hear it. Got anymore hi-res pictures?

Indeed.  Arms are 98% complete, then all that's really left are the straps and the metal around her neck.  

[Goat_Shepard]

knight5923 wrote...

Totally unrelated, but Kurt Russell is a badass. Snake M-F PlisskenB) *watching Esape from LA*

Eyepatch was a little much.

I did enjoy the surfing the tidal wave, though, that was pretty kewl

Now stop distracting me! Come on, Shepard:

[RiptideX1090]

JeanLuc761 wrote...

Alphyn wrote...

JeanLuc761 wrote...

Very, very well. 

Glad to hear it. Got anymore hi-res pictures?

Indeed.  Arms are 98% complete, then all that's really left are the straps and the metal around her neck.  

You sir, win.

At everything.

Period.

[knight5923]

Goat_Shepard wrote...
7 hours, actually. And you can live on less, technically. Michael Crichton pointed out you live longer if you sleep less.

If you don't believe me, damn you all because Crichton is never wrong (unlike Miranda, he doesn't say it).

*throws smoke screen*
*sultry snip*
*disappears in the confusion*

But is that one of those fake-out statistics, where it's like "You're spending more hours awake, and are therefore technically experiencing more hours of life."?

Like that dumb "every cigarette takes seven minutes of your life." thing, where someone just timed how long it took someone to smoke a cig, and worded it to sound more ominous:?
Not defending smoking, personally, just saying: kind of a cheap stat

[knight5923]

Tootles, Goat

Keelah Se'lai!

[RedTracer7]

 Oh, why does BBCode hate me!  Standardize, stupid internets.  

[RiptideX1090]

knight5923 wrote...

Goat_Shepard wrote...
7 hours, actually. And you can live on less, technically. Michael Crichton pointed out you live longer if you sleep less.

If you don't believe me, damn you all because Crichton is never wrong (unlike Miranda, he doesn't say it).

*throws smoke screen*
*sultry snip*
*disappears in the confusion*

But is that one of those fake-out statistics, where it's like "You're spending more hours awake, and are therefore technically experiencing more hours of life."?

Like that dumb "every cigarette takes seven minutes of your life." thing, where someone just timed how long it took someone to smoke a cig, and worded it to sound more ominous:?
Not defending smoking, personally, just saying: kind of a cheap stat

When getting into demographics and epidemiology, take everything you hear with a grain of salt. Everyone mocks up their reports and polls in some way.

But, from experiance, I can tell you 7 hours is a good number for sleep. You might be different. But I think it's scientifically sound.

[RedTracer7]

RiptideX1090 wrote...

knight5923 wrote...

Goat_Shepard wrote...
7 hours, actually. And you can live on less, technically. Michael Crichton pointed out you live longer if you sleep less.

If you don't believe me, damn you all because Crichton is never wrong (unlike Miranda, he doesn't say it).

*throws smoke screen*
*sultry snip*
*disappears in the confusion*

But is that one of those fake-out statistics, where it's like "You're spending more hours awake, and are therefore technically experiencing more hours of life."?

Like that dumb "every cigarette takes seven minutes of your life." thing, where someone just timed how long it took someone to smoke a cig, and worded it to sound more ominous:?
Not defending smoking, personally, just saying: kind of a cheap stat

When getting into demographics and epidemiology, take everything you hear with a grain of salt. Everyone mocks up their reports and polls in some way.

But, from experiance, I can tell you 7 hours is a good number for sleep. You might be different. But I think it's scientifically sound.

You can say that again.  Statistics is an art, not a science.  It all depends on how you paint it.

[Sky Shadowing]

RiptideX1090 wrote...

knight5923 wrote...

Goat_Shepard wrote...
7 hours, actually. And you can live on less, technically. Michael Crichton pointed out you live longer if you sleep less.

If you don't believe me, damn you all because Crichton is never wrong (unlike Miranda, he doesn't say it).

*throws smoke screen*
*sultry snip*
*disappears in the confusion*

But is that one of those fake-out statistics, where it's like "You're spending more hours awake, and are therefore technically experiencing more hours of life."?

Like that dumb "every cigarette takes seven minutes of your life." thing, where someone just timed how long it took someone to smoke a cig, and worded it to sound more ominous:?
Not defending smoking, personally, just saying: kind of a cheap stat

When getting into demographics and epidemiology, take everything you hear with a grain of salt. Everyone mocks up their reports and polls in some way.

But, from experiance, I can tell you 7 hours is a good number for sleep. You might be different. But I think it's scientifically sound.

Depends really on age. Babies sleep all the fricking time. As you grow older, you need less and less sleep.

Also depends on the person. There are people who (reportedly) haven't slept in 30 years and are still functioning.

Then again, they likely go through "microsleep", where the body sleeps and wakes up so quickly you don't even realize it (but it's dangerous to people driving)

Modifié par Sky Shadowing, 14 avril 2010 - 05:32 .

[RiptideX1090]

RedTracer7 wrote...

You can say that again.  Statistics is an art, not a science.  It all depends on how you paint it.

No ****. I actually took a year of Epidemiology.

It was very enlightening.

[RiptideX1090]

[quote]Sky Shadowing wrote...

[/quote]Depends really on age. Babies sleep all the fricking time. As you grow older, you need less and less sleep.

Also depends on the person. There are people who (reportedly) haven't slept in 30 years and are still functioning.

Then again, they likely go through "microsleep", where the body sleeps and wakes up so quickly you don't even realize it (but it's dangerous to people driving)

[/quote]

Don't know about people going 30 years without sleep, longest the body can go is about a week or two before succumbing to death.

But some people work differently than others. I know Leonardo DaVinci slept two hours, then stayed awake for six, and then slept for two more, in a cycle. He died young, but he lived much longer than most anyone else from his time did due to being awake longer.

[RedTracer7]

RiptideX1090 wrote...

RedTracer7 wrote...

You can say that again.  Statistics is an art, not a science.  It all depends on how you paint it.

No ****. I actually took a year of Epidemiology.

It was very enlightening.

Lulz;)

[knight5923]

I've found I used to be able to get away with 5-6 hours of sleep, but since since first year of university 5 years ago, I've noticed that anything less than 5 hours now and I'm screwed for the rest of the day. Just physically ill all friggin day:sick:

[RiptideX1090]

knight5923 wrote...

I've found I used to be able to get away with 5-6 hours of sleep, but since since first year of university 5 years ago, I've noticed that anything less than 5 hours now and I'm screwed for the rest of the day. Just physically ill all friggin day:sick:

Five hours is pushing it.

Your diet also affects how well you can manage.

[RedTracer7]

 Hmm.  I'm rather unsure if I feel like writing Chapter 5 of my ongoing fanfic, or if I want to do a Oneshot thats a bit... less depressing.  

Decisions, decisions...

[chool77]

iv been gone for a hour... and we only moved three pgs....

[MrBoomba]

chool77 wrote...

iv been gone for a hour... and we only moved three pgs....

Ive been in classes so cant post a lot

[knight5923]

chool77 wrote...

iv been gone for a hour... and we only moved three pgs....

You know what I blame the downfall of?

..............Society^_^

[Gust4v]

epoch_ wrote...

You guys might like this.
http://masseffect.bi...x/quarians.html

just keep clicking on tali once it loads.

Wow, great.Thanks for the link.

[RiptideX1090]

chool77 wrote...

iv been gone for a hour... and we only moved three pgs....

And that's a bad thing?

I personally prefer it like this.

Nice and... manageable.

[chool77]

chool77 wrote...

alright before i head out to school i want to share my ADD day dream .


how cool would it have been if the grand prize in the auction was a free trip to Bioware to meet all of the VA's and all the developers !!!................ what would you talk to them about?

just want to see what you guys would do ?

[JeanLuc761]

Do you think any of you could find a nice, clear image of Tali with her "speaking light" on?



I can't seem to find a good reference.

[RedTracer7]

JeanLuc761 wrote...

Do you think any of you could find a nice, clear image of Tali with her "speaking light" on?

I can't seem to find a good reference.

Isn't the light always on, and it flickers on and off only when she talks?