258292 réponses à ce sujet

[JeanLuc761]

Savakka1 wrote...

JeanLuc761 wrote...
Am I the only one here who thought ME2 was more thought provoking and indepth than ME1 was?  I feel so alone 

Game itself was, but the story was more deeper then in first ME.

I guess it comes down to what you define as the "story."

Myself, I treat every single thing I learn, every character I meet, every mission I undertake as part of the story.  I don't (often) separate the main plot from the sub plots because the characters are equally important as the reaper threat is.

Modifié par JeanLuc761, 18 avril 2010 - 03:12 .

[Napalm Jim]

JeanLuc761 wrote...

Someone With Mass wrote...

Shazzammer2 wrote...

Someone With Mass wrote...

It's really sad when people won't go deep with a game because they're lazy/stupid or that would be considered "gay" and just throws it into two categories: Sucks or Rocks.

That is what happened with ME2. Been dumbed down to there levels.

Yeah, just to appeal to the "casual" gamers. Can't risk them hurting their brains, or actually THINK.

To me, it's just an insult.

Am I the only one here who thought ME2 was more thought provoking and indepth than ME1 was?  I feel so alone 

Well, at least so far as characters go.

Not at all.  My cousin and I were talking about it last week, how ME2 seemed to be a much more involving story.  Totally don't see it as being dumbed down.

As to how Liara and Ash/Kaiden were handled on the other hand...<_<

[Phil725]

JeanLuc761 wrote...

Someone With Mass wrote...

Shazzammer2 wrote...

Someone With Mass wrote...

It's really sad when people won't go deep with a game because they're lazy/stupid or that would be considered "gay" and just throws it into two categories: Sucks or Rocks.

That is what happened with ME2. Been dumbed down to there levels.

Yeah, just to appeal to the "casual" gamers. Can't risk them hurting their brains, or actually THINK.

To me, it's just an insult.

Am I the only one here who thought ME2 was more thought provoking and indepth than ME1 was?  I feel so alone 

Well, at least so far as characters go.

I fully agree with you.  ME1's gameplay was simple as well.  And the characters and emotions of the game weren't anywhere near the levels of ME2.  ME1's advantage was that the universe was new and engulfing.  No where near ME2 from an emotional standpoint though.

[Saint Op]

DrathanGervaise wrote...

Saint Op wrote...

DrathanGervaise wrote...

Alcohol and Rage cure all wounds.

Except liver problems and high blood pressure.

That just means you're not using enough alcohol and/or rage.

Halfweights can't subscribe to this doctrine and expect results,
you've got to put your entire being into kicking ass to make it work.

Hmm maybe, I don't drink. I work somewher that forbids it.  I do have rage for days, even though I break heads with a smile. 

[Savakka1]

Well, I`am off to play the Migrant Fleet mission again, and probably something else too See you in a couple of hours.

[SPARTANMST]

JeanLuc761 wrote...

Someone With Mass wrote...

Shazzammer2 wrote...

Someone With Mass wrote...

It's really sad when people won't go deep with a game because they're lazy/stupid or that would be considered "gay" and just throws it into two categories: Sucks or Rocks.

That is what happened with ME2. Been dumbed down to there levels.

Yeah, just to appeal to the "casual" gamers. Can't risk them hurting their brains, or actually THINK.

To me, it's just an insult.

Am I the only one here who thought ME2 was more thought provoking and indepth than ME1 was?  I feel so alone 

Well, at least so far as characters go.

ME2 is the most though provoking, emotional rollercoaster I have ever experienced, I though DA:O was good but that was then, this is now, ME2 is just amazing, its a lot deeper than just killing reapers and collectors, if u want a game like that, I say go and play COD, if u want to play a REAL game that makes you think then ME is for you, I really enjoyed playing this game and it really shows us what games might be like in the future...

[Someone With Mass]

I can't drink, because that kills the meds that I'm taking. And that will eventually kill me.



Now, I have to fix some stuff. BRB.

[Katharr]

Posting on my birthyear-page, that's awesome.

[Saint Op]

Katharr wrote...

Posting on my birthyear-page, that's awesome.

Really wow makes me feel better.

[Katharr]

Saint Op wrote...

Katharr wrote...

Posting on my birthyear-page, that's awesome.

Really wow makes me feel better.

Pff, kids these days .

[SPARTANMST]

I hate how most people think that games have to just involve blowing things up and that story and character development isn't important. IMO the most important things in a game are:

1.Story

2.Characters

3.Soundtrack

4. Gameplay



in that order



did i miss anything?

[Saint Op]

Katharr wrote...

Saint Op wrote...

Katharr wrote...

Posting on my birthyear-page, that's awesome.

Really wow makes me feel better.

Pff, kids these days .

yeah they did a age role call thing a few days ago, I was like ,,

[JeanLuc761]

SPARTANMST wrote...

I hate how most people think that games have to just involve blowing things up and that story and character development isn't important. IMO the most important things in a game are:
1.Story
2.Characters
3.Soundtrack
4. Gameplay

in that order

did i miss anything?

I agree, but only so far as Singleplayer-heavy games go.

If I'm looking for a good multiplayer game, gameplay always comes first (Unreal Tournament 2004)

[SPARTANMST]

SPARTANMST wrote...

I hate how most people think that games have to just involve blowing things up and that story and character development isn't important. IMO the most important things in a game are:
1.Story
2.Characters
3.Soundtrack
4. Gameplay

in that order

did i miss anything?

I wouldn't mind if they turned Mass Effect 3 into one huge 30 hour interactive movie, as long as the choices were there as wel as some good actuin scenes I'd be happy

[Phil725]

SPARTANMST wrote...

I hate how most people think that games have to just involve blowing things up and that story and character development isn't important. IMO the most important things in a game are:
1.Story
2.Characters
3.Soundtrack
4. Gameplay

in that order

did i miss anything?

Graphics is something that a lot of people care about.

Personally, I couldn't care less about graphics or soundtrack.

[SPARTANMST]

JeanLuc761 wrote...

SPARTANMST wrote...

I hate how most people think that games have to just involve blowing things up and that story and character development isn't important. IMO the most important things in a game are:
1.Story
2.Characters
3.Soundtrack
4. Gameplay

in that order

did i miss anything?

I agree, but only so far as Singleplayer-heavy games go.

If I'm looking for a good multiplayer game, gameplay always comes first (Unreal Tournament 2004)

well yeah with MP games gameplay is the most important but I prefer SP games anyway, I am one for good storytelling etc

[SPARTANMST]

Phil725 wrote...

SPARTANMST wrote...

I hate how most people think that games have to just involve blowing things up and that story and character development isn't important. IMO the most important things in a game are:
1.Story
2.Characters
3.Soundtrack
4. Gameplay

in that order

did i miss anything?

Graphics is something that a lot of people care about.

Personally, I couldn't care less about graphics or soundtrack.

i agree with you about Graphics but the soundtrack to me makes those epic moments EPIC, the sad moments SAD and the bits in-between just amazing

[Simon9one]

SPARTANMST wrote...

I hate how most people think that games have to just involve blowing things up and that story and character development isn't important. IMO the most important things in a game are:
1.Story
2.Characters
3.Soundtrack
4. Gameplay

in that order

did i miss anything?

That's about how I view my single-player games.
Although sometimes story and characters are interchangeable.  Like in the Fire Emblem series for example...love the characters, but the story isn't always the best. 

[Katharr]

Phil725 wrote...

SPARTANMST wrote...

I hate how most people think that games have to just involve blowing things up and that story and character development isn't important. IMO the most important things in a game are:
1.Story
2.Characters
3.Soundtrack
4. Gameplay

in that order

did i miss anything?

Graphics is something that a lot of people care about.

Personally, I couldn't care less about graphics or soundtrack.

Graphics i agree but not soundtrack. A really good soundtrack can add soo much to the whole game experience or on the other hand, a bad one can destroy it completely.

Modifié par Katharr, 18 avril 2010 - 03:22 .

[SPARTANMST]

Simon9one wrote...

SPARTANMST wrote...

I hate how most people think that games have to just involve blowing things up and that story and character development isn't important. IMO the most important things in a game are:
1.Story
2.Characters
3.Soundtrack
4. Gameplay

in that order

did i miss anything?

That's about how I view my single-player games.
Although sometimes story and characters are interchangeable.  Like in the Fire Emblem series for example...love the characters, but the story isn't always the best. 

yeah well as long as either characters or story are good I'm usually happy

[Someone With Mass]

Yeah, that "Those are the bad guys. Let's kill them." basic story isn't cutting it anymore for me.

[Saint Op]

Yeah I stay away from online MP games. I learned that I can't play with anyone I can't physically strangle for being a ass.