Skadhi1 wrote...
Phil725 wrote...
You just kind of looped back to the beginning of the argument. We agree that if this was a question on a law test, the correct answer would be to exile her. Shep didn't prove that she was innocent, and finding her guilty of the charges is the logical conclusion.
Depends. If Quarians operate under a "guilty until proven innocent" paradigm and a "beyond a reasonable doubt" level of proof (U.S. and U.K. system), then Shepard need not prove her innocent. Rather, he needs to create sufficient doubt about the evidence such that the admiralty board concludes that guilt has not been proved. Seemingly, he did this, based on the character issue, i.e., Tali could not have done the crime because of her inate character qualities.
Practically speaking, it is impossible to prove innocence.
I'm hesitant to connect a real world equivalent to the flotilla personally. We don't know nearly enough about the flotilla, and I don't know about law
I see the trial as a lot more casual than courts for us. The trial being more about exiling her being a bad idea/pointless, rather than justified or not. He proved that pretty well.
*top*
Modifié par Phil725, 04 juillet 2010 - 06:47 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




