Thelacan wrote...
RiptideX1090 wrote...
No fur...
I'd be fine with long, slender plates though. Assuming Grunt wasn't talking about Quarian suits when he said they weren't soft. I know most disagree... but I'm fairly sure he was talking about their biology.
No fur indeed. And wouldn't believe it would be so if Rannoch is more arid and warmer planet. Like savannah is, the fur would be no-go on a predators.
For Grunt's mention about how quarians aren't so soft, the meaning of the suit wouldn't make sense. How come a quarian in enviro suit would be stronger than a human in a hardsuit? It definetely has to mean their biology.
The suit explanation for Grunt's line is that all Grunt knows is war data implanted into his head from Okeer. He's not talking about hugging different races, he's talking about which ones are easiest to jam a knife through their spines. Humans and asari likely fall into two categories, every day situations, and war situations. Quarians meanwhile, only have one version that's relevant to Grunt, and that's with the envirosuit on. He likely wouldn't know how hard a quarian without a suit on is to stab because its useless information, he's never going to see one. I assume Grunt was talking about a non combat situation, like a bar fight personally. In that case, humans and asari would be easy to stab, while quarians (their suits should be very resistant to knives for obvious reasons,) and turians (who always wear armor, similar to quarians,) would be harder.
If you don't buy the suit argument, its conceivable that he was talking about strictly bone density. Quarians having a stronger skeleton than humans/asari is believable, maybe even likely, given their skinny arms don't seem to hamper them in any way.
The skin argument is pretty much the last thing I would expect Grunt to be talking about personally, its pretty irrelevant unless it would offer significant resistance, and that just seems very unlikely to me.