LegendaryAvenger wrote...
TTTX wrote...
Pacifien wrote...
I'm just curious, is taking back the homeworld pretty much the consensus for the regulars of this thread?
I think so.
most think it should happen through peace (which is the best option if you ask me)
Peace is best achieved through peace. Violence will only destroy.
It's hard to define how peace is attained. Saving lives through bloodshed perpetuates the need for violence yet it is necessary lest we be victims to violence. Likewise our diplomatic stance on preventing violence only goes so far to take philosophical disputes and overall conflicts are inevitable. It's up to our decisions if we would prefer to act by our actions or our words and how we best deal with those who themselves decide the best course of action.
If the Geth were to lay down their arms before the Quarians would we see some taking shots? Of course. Same for if Quarians did it because, as we have seen from Legion, such a difficult decision is so split down the middle they alone cannot decide. It takes an outward party, such as Humans, Asari, Turians, to truly make the peace between warring species happen. Same thing goes for Humans and Turians: Asari and Salarians stepped in and now we're best buddies.
Diversity breeds both intrigue as much as conflict. We can never be too far from violence within peace but it doesn't mean it should fuel our actions simply because someone decides it's better to be wrong and fight than be right and concede. Overall who are we but individuals? Species don't make us who we are we do. Such as we should understand everyone has equal footing to be as good as us if not better and within a collection of varying options does the Galaxy evolve.
Modifié par DreadvasNormandy, 24 juillet 2010 - 05:27 .