Thats misfortunate. Hopefully that gets squared away quickly.badjezus007 wrote...
I am just pissed Cuz i didn't do the image thing, still got points taken away.
I am even more pissed because Bioware has yet to respond to this. and times awasting and I missing out on the auctions.
[Points reduction. How do you feel about it?]
#176
Posté 09 avril 2010 - 01:53
#177
Posté 09 avril 2010 - 01:56
#178
Posté 09 avril 2010 - 03:00
#179
Posté 09 avril 2010 - 03:05
donebadjezus007 wrote...
I'd love you forever if you clicked. I'll also click yours
#180
Posté 09 avril 2010 - 04:37
Mad Method wrote...
Actually, not true. All you have to do is compare the list of IPs that viewed the referrer link and see if that IP loaded, say, a CSS stylesheet on the page they should have been redirected to that day. If it was the image trick, none of the content on that page would have been loaded. Alternatively, they could check the HTTP referrer headers on the clicks and see if the referrer urls contained an IMG tag pointing to the Bioware Bazaar, but that's more easy to circumvent and a hell of a lot more resource intensive. All of this, of course, assumes they kept such web logs. Anyhow, I code websites too.
I don't think the original redirect sent you anything more than some header information. Had there been more, than yes they could have done that in the logs. They could have also recorded every referrer with the unique IP and user ID, which is really creepy and unnecessary. A quick cookie check would have sufficed, since as I said a browser does not allow cookie information through tags like IMG. No cookie set, no unique click recorded.
They could have also limited the number of unique IPs registering for a User ID per minute or couple minutes. That would have slowed down the IMG trick, pyramid schemes and people proxy/torring, keeping as many types of cheaters honest at once.
Ah, hindsight!
#181
Posté 09 avril 2010 - 11:46
#182
Posté 09 avril 2010 - 02:11
#183
Posté 09 avril 2010 - 03:13
Or maybe I wouldn't have, b/c we still don't know exactly how they determined how many tokens to remove, if I had seriously tried to get clicks between Thursday and Monday, would I still lose those clicks because the reduction was a flat number, or would I have kept them because they actually had a method of removing only the 'ill-gotten' tokens? .... The world may never know.
Modifié par cynicalsaint1, 09 avril 2010 - 03:14 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut






