207 réponses à ce sujet

[casedawgz]

Siansonea II wrote...

Yes, but that discussion has fled. Let us lament its passing. Now we have increasingly outrageous statements meant only to illustrate that in this age, there are individuals who still cling to antiquated, yet dangerous ideas. Humanity, you disappoint me sometimes.

Seriously, as Shepard said to Clerk Bosker, "I'm out there fighting to STOP crap like this!"

[Onyx Jaguar]

@catabuca yes

@jlb524 yep :ninjasmileybuti'musingquickreplysojustimagineithere:

[Ryzaki]

baller7345 wrote...

Except that biology worked for millions of years without balance.  Each envirnoment has a carrying capacity that controls the max population that any one species can have.  When a species goes over this capacity the species dies off because of starvation or some other cause due to a lack of resources.  Humans may have pushed our carrying capacity into the billions maybe even futhur due to technology but if we ever had a overpopulation problem that truly got out of hand then we would die out because of a lack of resources and the population would be stabilized.

On a previous note brought up I don't believe that they would cure being gay.  Chaning the levels of hormones that a person is subjected to while in the womb just wouldn't be ethical or safe.  As for the arguement that it is a genetic disorder I don't necessarily believe that since I believe the deciding factors in whether or not someone is gay or not lies in the varying levels of testorone that one is exposed to.

Except you know...there is a balance. Its when the balance is broken that the species dies out.
That carrying capacity...its a balance.
Natural predators: balance
Infant mortality: balance

Or maybe I'm just weird. *shrugs* I see a balance in nature and when its disrupted that's usually when the species starts either dying out or mutating to rebalance itself.

Its not a perfect balance but when it tips too much then you get incidents like species dying out.

Then again I don't know everything so *shrugs* There may not be a balance. But if humans were to run across the world rampant with no regard for anything else (like we're already doing to a large extent) they'd be a point where something has to give. (and it looks like we're fast approaching that point).

Modifié par Ryzaki, 08 avril 2010 - 08:15 .

[casedawgz]

Ryzaki wrote...

baller7345 wrote...

Except that biology worked for millions of years without balance.  Each envirnoment has a carrying capacity that controls the max population that any one species can have.  When a species goes over this capacity the species dies off because of starvation or some other cause due to a lack of resources.  Humans may have pushed our carrying capacity into the billions maybe even futhur due to technology but if we ever had a overpopulation problem that truly got out of hand then we would die out because of a lack of resources and the population would be stabilized.

On a previous note brought up I don't believe that they would cure being gay.  Chaning the levels of hormones that a person is subjected to while in the womb just wouldn't be ethical or safe.  As for the arguement that it is a genetic disorder I don't necessarily believe that since I believe the deciding factors in whether or not someone is gay or not lies in the varying levels of testorone that one is exposed to.

Except you know...there is a balance. Its when the balance is broken that the species dies out.
That carrying capacity...its a balance.
Natural predators: balance
Infant mortality: balance

Or maybe I'm just weird. *shrugs* I see a balance in nature and when its disrupted that's usually when the species starts either dying out or mutating to rebalance itself.

Its not a perfect balance but when it tips then you get incidents like species dying out.

You mad True Neutral you.

[Russalka]

Try to notice what the topic is about, not fall into troll traps or irrelevant discussions.

But naive me for believing this wouldn't get closed so fast.

[Ryzaki]

casedawgz wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

baller7345 wrote...

Except that biology worked for millions of years without balance.  Each envirnoment has a carrying capacity that controls the max population that any one species can have.  When a species goes over this capacity the species dies off because of starvation or some other cause due to a lack of resources.  Humans may have pushed our carrying capacity into the billions maybe even futhur due to technology but if we ever had a overpopulation problem that truly got out of hand then we would die out because of a lack of resources and the population would be stabilized.

On a previous note brought up I don't believe that they would cure being gay.  Chaning the levels of hormones that a person is subjected to while in the womb just wouldn't be ethical or safe.  As for the arguement that it is a genetic disorder I don't necessarily believe that since I believe the deciding factors in whether or not someone is gay or not lies in the varying levels of testorone that one is exposed to.

Except you know...there is a balance. Its when the balance is broken that the species dies out.
That carrying capacity...its a balance.
Natural predators: balance
Infant mortality: balance

Or maybe I'm just weird. *shrugs* I see a balance in nature and when its disrupted that's usually when the species starts either dying out or mutating to rebalance itself.

Its not a perfect balance but when it tips then you get incidents like species dying out.

You mad True Neutral you.

Hey what can I say I like being neutral. Makes life fun.

[javierabegazo]

We don't need two M/M romance threads. Please refer to the already established one

http://social.biowar...3/index/1438064