Nightwriter wrote...
Onyx Jaguar wrote...
We do know he contacted them. But because he himself believed that Cerberus was a "rogue" entity of the Alliance, promising such information was dangerous.
I'll put it this way, the ones who killed his men deserved to die. Kahoku for being an intelligence risk had to be dealt with.
My only disagreement with you is that Kahoku's death should not be listed among Cerberus's crimes.
If Kahoku was to be dealt with, it should've been by the Alliance, not Cerberus - not that it would've been fair to put him on trial when the Alliance itself was less than innocent in dealing with Cerberus in the first place.
But Cerberus killing him, that was a crime. That was murder, and it was wrong.
Well that could be the case, regardless he would have needed to be dealt with. However if Cerberus is still part of the Alliance, which I think it is to an extent, and also from what we have seen the Alliance wouldn't be above this, then it would have been sanctioned by the Alliance. Hacket basically has you eliminate someone in ME 1 if you go renegade, this would have been a similar circumstance except it would be Cerberus operatives handling the job.
EDIT: Also Shepard is pretty much above the law taking out those operatives would have been problematic for the Alliance and Cerberus as you can give the data to the SB. But since Shepard is quite a bit more valuable in the short term anyway they could allow Shepard to live.
Modifié par Onyx Jaguar, 07 avril 2010 - 11:07 .