Nobody, to my knowledge. Are you?Bucky_McLachlan wrote...
Who said that I was bland homogenized multi-player and a ****ty single-player campaign?
Modifié par marshalleck, 08 avril 2010 - 04:58 .
Nobody, to my knowledge. Are you?Bucky_McLachlan wrote...
Who said that I was bland homogenized multi-player and a ****ty single-player campaign?
Modifié par marshalleck, 08 avril 2010 - 04:58 .
megatron999 wrote...
well with respect to everyone here most games in the future will require users to be continuosly connected to the internet so will likely have some form of MP on them anyway.
Bucky_McLachlan wrote...
Waiting until someone edits their post helps buddy.
Modifié par gashgfjaskgfkagh, 08 avril 2010 - 05:15 .
You mean the people who vehemently oppose it?LOLandStuff wrote...
What is it with some people obsessing over MP?
Bucky_McLachlan wrote...
You mean the people who vehemently oppose it?LOLandStuff wrote...
What is it with some people obsessing over MP?
It's silly. If you don't like to pvp don't do it. Simple.
Same, but to answer your question I am 99.9% certain that most of the people on this site (and gaming sites in general) actually suck at video games. They have enough trouble killing AI to have to worry about killing other players.MegWithAMouth wrote...
Wow. I really don't get why people are getting so hostile over the mere mention of this idea. If it didn't hurt the single player gameplay in any way, why would it bother you so much to at least have it as an option?
Personally, I think it would be awesome, if done right.
MegWithAMouth wrote...
Wow. I really don't get why people are getting so hostile over the mere mention of this idea. If it didn't hurt the single player gameplay in any way, why would it bother you so much to at least have it as an option?
Personally, I think it would be awesome, if done right.
That's great. I do want to see some multiplayer in ME. So why don't you simply not enjoy the the optional multiplayer content that has nothign at all do with the story while I do?LOLandStuff wrote...
Bucky_McLachlan wrote...
You mean the people who vehemently oppose it?LOLandStuff wrote...
What is it with some people obsessing over MP?
It's silly. If you don't like to pvp don't do it. Simple.
The people who want to see MP in every game they play.
If I want to PvP I go play other games. But I don't want to see ME turned into a MP.
Anecdotal evidence. Cite examples or GTFO.ExtremeOne wrote...
but it will because any all games that have a story mode and MP mode the one that gets screwed over and messed up is the story mode.
Modifié par Bucky_McLachlan, 08 avril 2010 - 05:32 .
Bucky_McLachlan wrote...
Anecdotal evidence. Cite examples or GTFO.ExtremeOne wrote...
but it will because any all games that have a story mode and MP mode the one that gets screwed over and messed up is the story mode.
Bucky_McLachlan wrote...
That's great. I do want to see some multiplayer in ME. So why don't you simply not enjoy the the optional multiplayer content that has nothign at all do with the story while I do?LOLandStuff wrote...
Bucky_McLachlan wrote...
You mean the people who vehemently oppose it?LOLandStuff wrote...
What is it with some people obsessing over MP?
It's silly. If you don't like to pvp don't do it. Simple.
The people who want to see MP in every game they play.
If I want to PvP I go play other games. But I don't want to see ME turned into a MP.
Well I want Bioware to ignore the majority of their fanbase because they're happy to receive whatever offerings of scrap Bioware offers them and most of them are naive kids with no life experience who know next to nothing about about the process of developing a loaf of bread, let alone a video game.marshalleck wrote...
I want 100% of ME3's budget going to concluding the story in dramatic and memorable fashion.
One video game does not provide conclusive evidence to support this claim.marshalleck wrote...
Bucky_McLachlan wrote...
Anecdotal evidence. Cite examples or GTFO.ExtremeOne wrote...
but it will because any all games that have a story mode and MP mode the one that gets screwed over and messed up is the story mode.
Modern Warfare 2 is a prime example of sidelining any pretense of plot or story in favor of developing multiplayer gameplay.
Oh wait, you didn't like it when I mentioned that before. I wonder why.
Modifié par Bucky_McLachlan, 08 avril 2010 - 05:54 .
Bucky_McLachlan wrote...
Well I want Bioware to ignore the majority of their fanbase because they're happy to receive whatever offerings of scrap Bioware offers them and most of them are naive kids with no life experience who know next to nothing about about the process of developing a loaf of bread, let alone a video game.marshalleck wrote...
I want 100% of ME3's budget going to concluding the story in dramatic and memorable fashion.
When is that ever going to happen?
I don't believe Bioware's resources are endless, but I definitely believe they care more about making money than quality games. Not that their games aren't good but they definitely don't put as much money as they could into their games, or as much time and effort into developing them as they should.marshalleck wrote...
Bucky_McLachlan wrote...
Well I want Bioware to ignore the majority of their fanbase because they're happy to receive whatever offerings of scrap Bioware offers them and most of them are naive kids with no life experience who know next to nothing about about the process of developing a loaf of bread, let alone a video game.marshalleck wrote...
I want 100% of ME3's budget going to concluding the story in dramatic and memorable fashion.
When is that ever going to happen?
Speaking of obviously naive, there are only a few people in this thread who seem to believe that Bioware's resources are endless, and that implementing a high-quality and yet thoroughly optional multiplayer mode is not only plausible but practical and even well-advised.
Modifié par Bucky_McLachlan, 08 avril 2010 - 05:53 .