22 réponses à ce sujet

[Jmesun]

how bout an add on so u can play with  your  buddys and so forth.. that would be awsome. and unlimited play through times just becuase..like after second playthrough they would allow 3 and so forth

[Solidpanic]

What? you dont make any sense

[JLBoyyy]

s/he wants co-op



i would accept that only in ME3 and if it didnt go on the main storyline



my thought was two N7 operatives/spectres (or maybe being like a turian or krogan or whatever) that were you and your buddy (can be solo, split scree or online via xbox live/internet people online thingy) doing hard missions. it could be like the two of you doing things by yourself, commanding different squads, supporting a diversion, etc against a lot of enemies since there willl be two good people instead of one



thats my thought, and the "choose your speciees" thing would be something a lot of people like

[AesirEdge]

Solidpanic wrote...

What? you dont make any sense

hes talking about co-op

[MrFob]

No coop! If they continue to make ME games after ME3, than by all means, go ahead but it just doesn't make sense for the Shepard trilogy. Most importantly, I'd rather want them to concentrate on the narrative and the single player experience. These things always suffer from the time and gameplay mechanics demands of a multilayer mode. So please don't.



As far as dlc in general is concerned, I'd rather like a real addon with 15-20 hours of stry and gameplay. Don't get me wrong, Kasumi was a pretty cool dlc IMO but all these half integrated peaces just don't cut it.

[JLBoyyy]

MrFob wrote...

No coop! If they continue to make ME games after ME3, than by all means, go ahead but it just doesn't make sense for the Shepard trilogy. Most importantly, I'd rather want them to concentrate on the narrative and the single player experience. These things always suffer from the time and gameplay mechanics demands of a multilayer mode. So please don't.

As far as dlc in general is concerned, I'd rather like a real addon with 15-20 hours of stry and gameplay. Don't get me wrong, Kasumi was a pretty cool dlc IMO but all these half integrated peaces just don't cut it.

what about what i said?

the missions could just be random missions you do that have no storyline, or have a really weak storyline

could be like spec ops in MW2, just better

[BigAlBeast25]

it would be nice. maybe in the next game

[hex23]

No. Not every game needs co-op. It would be retarded for the "Mass Effect" universe considering it's angle or selling point is the choices you make and how much they supposedly matter.

If you want a co-op 3rd person shooter go play "Gears Of War" or "Lost Planet 2".

Modifié par hex23, 09 avril 2010 - 03:17 .

[newbill]

i wish that in the dlc that theyed make the new chars more intertwined in the main story,add romance subplots add more dialog between the new chars and shepard and they need to put out a dlc thats like the expansion for dragon age make it 20hrs plus long like awakening was make it a prequel for ME3 and they get tons of people wanting it

[Noobius_Maximo]

No, no, and no.



This is not Halo.

[Landline]

JLBoyyy wrote...

MrFob wrote...

No coop! If they continue to make ME games after ME3, than by all means, go ahead but it just doesn't make sense for the Shepard trilogy. Most importantly, I'd rather want them to concentrate on the narrative and the single player experience. These things always suffer from the time and gameplay mechanics demands of a multilayer mode. So please don't.

As far as dlc in general is concerned, I'd rather like a real addon with 15-20 hours of stry and gameplay. Don't get me wrong, Kasumi was a pretty cool dlc IMO but all these half integrated peaces just don't cut it.

what about what i said?

the missions could just be random missions you do that have no storyline, or have a really weak storyline

could be like spec ops in MW2, just better

No story? Then it wouldn't really be Mass Effect then would it?

[vhatever]

It would be really interesting if Bioware did a Borderlands/L4D type multiplayer option cooperative. Incredibly interesting but highly unlikely.  Would be really cool ifthey also did a competitive mode where the players could play the "bad" guys or the "good" guys, against one another. I wanna be the YMIR mech.

Modifié par vhatever, 09 avril 2010 - 05:44 .

[JLBoyyy]

Landline wrote...

JLBoyyy wrote...

MrFob wrote...

No coop! If they continue to make ME games after ME3, than by all means, go ahead but it just doesn't make sense for the Shepard trilogy. Most importantly, I'd rather want them to concentrate on the narrative and the single player experience. These things always suffer from the time and gameplay mechanics demands of a multilayer mode. So please don't.

As far as dlc in general is concerned, I'd rather like a real addon with 15-20 hours of stry and gameplay. Don't get me wrong, Kasumi was a pretty cool dlc IMO but all these half integrated peaces just don't cut it.

what about what i said?

the missions could just be random missions you do that have no storyline, or have a really weak storyline

could be like spec ops in MW2, just better

No story? Then it wouldn't really be Mass Effect then would it?

i meant for co-op.  but you dont have to be random people, you could be your shepard and your like secret family member who is also a spectre, or maybe another spectre

the only reason for not that good story is so they could focus on ME3 more

btw, only good with ME3.  i dont want DLC for it

[dskylark]

How would a DLC do it? I dont know much (read: anything) about programming, but adding Co-op to a game that doesnt original support sounds like it would need MUCH more work than a DLC could provide.



I like the idea of Co-op in ME because you're going to be with two other squad mates anyway. Why not have a buddy take over Grunt of Miranda? For ME3 it would be cool.

[WrexEffex]

This one would be displeased with co-op.

[Rapamaha1]

No, Id rather have bioware focus on making a perfect single player instead of wasting their time on multiplayer

[Inferno Sock]

It would work i guess if Player 2 was a squad mate, ie Garus, Kaiden, Liara

[Merci357]

Rapamaha1 wrote...

No, Id rather have bioware focus on making a perfect single player instead of wasting their time on multiplayer

QFT.

I'd love to see more story, more lore, more dialogue, more choices - things that don't fit into a co-op mode that well. Maybe in ME3 or even more likely in a later spin off to the Me series, but for sure not with a DLC.

[Therigan]

They just need to release a add on that's not just one single mission needs to be like a whole story with events in it and all...


social.bioware.com/brc/689521

[Grecko32]

No i dont want more content, I want less



/sarcasm off.



Yes i would love co-op

[Jmesun]

wasnt trying to take anything away from the game. i just think it would be cool to join up and play the other characters and use there abilitys, it would be coool to see all the sick kills you could pull offf. thats all.. well peace,, ya and im talking about co-op

[IoneWanderer101]

JLBoyyy wrote...

s/he wants co-op

i would accept that only in ME3 and if it didnt go on the main storyline

my thought was two N7 operatives/spectres (or maybe being like a turian or krogan or whatever) that were you and your buddy (can be solo, split scree or online via xbox live/internet people online thingy) doing hard missions. it could be like the two of you doing things by yourself, commanding different squads, supporting a diversion, etc against a lot of enemies since there willl be two good people instead of one

thats my thought, and the "choose your speciees" thing would be something a lot of people like

I'm not a call of duty fanboy... HELL NO!
but i think that what they did with spec ops missions was very clever, for those who don't know a set of missions for co-op seperate from the campaign. If they implemented somthing like this in ME3 it would be very good.(on the assumption that it in NO WAY affects the singleplayer.

[Chuvvy]

**** co-op man. You can't do that in a game like ME or any rpg (I use that term loosely)