-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah, an appropriate thread for pointing out Bazaar flaws.
I
realized almost immediately that with 5950 tokens, I wasn't going to get
squat. So, instead, I've been crunching data. Found some interesting
stiff (and I'm far from done!).
How do you explain that 28+
winners have _no_ games registered? Game registration alone is worth
anywhere from 1200 to 6000+ tokens, so you just know that if they had
them, they would have registered them. According to the rules, you do
NOT need to own or register any games, but... It's like starting your
token collection at -6000 compared to everybody else. Yet these people
amassed enough tokens to win auctions that cost 8620+ (the lowest
winning bid). The peculiar thing is that many winners with no games
registered _do_ have game achievements and other indications of having
played the games. Are they just playing on their siblings' copies of
the games? Or are they themselves their "brothers" and "sisters" and
"mother" and "father" and...and... The rules say a _person_ can have
only one token-accumulating account. But the only verification that one
person is different from another is the email address and name. It
seems it would be incredibly easy to amass a dozen or more free email
accounts from various providers such as Yahoo, Comcast, GMail, etc., and
assign a different identity to each. Then you start having each
account do referrals to each other to start the ball rolling. Then
bring in a dozen of your friends, each doing the same thing. Then start
swapping clicks. There's 500 points a day right there. And it might
be pertinent to point out that at least 15 of those 28+ didn't join the
forum until on or after the Bazaar was announced on 3/29. (They don't
own the games. They don't play the games. They're just here for the
free stuff. How does that qualify them as part of "the community"?)
There'
was also a fascinating bit, Statistics-wise, that occurred yesterday.
Three winners in a row each had the exact same avatar. It's
odds-defying because A) same avatar, 1-in-105 chance individually, but in a row?
auction at the same time, C) they each have enough tokens to actually
bid, D) and they each actually _win_ their auctions 1, 2, 3. As a
racing Trifecta, the payout would be enormous and the fact that it
happened strains one's credulity -- UNLESS you know Occam's Razor and
come to the simplest explanation.
For a contest where a winner
can take home only two prizes max, this has happened ONCE. Ecliptic
Deimos dropped 9321 on a BW Lit Pack + 9250 on a ME Novels pack =
18,571. Then the very next item was a graphics card valued at $179 that
went for a bid of 10806. (I guess it doesn't pay to be impatient.)
Enough
nuggets for now. Time to get back to mining data!




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut






