3 réponses à ce sujet

[AXidenT Gamer]

Are there any advantages to a dual wielding warrior over a dual wielding rogue? Other than a bit more default health.

[Wissenschaft]

Yeah, you can bump up strength so you can good medium armor as well as use high strength weapons sooner in your main hand. That means more damage and access to the Warrior threat talents.

[Cl_Flushentityhero]

I don't know about advantages, but you *do* have the warrior talent tree instead of the rogue one.

[BackwardCompatibility]

My first try at the game was that. I specialized as a Berserker and a Reaver. I found it to be a kick ass choice. DPS power! I served as much as a tank than a damage dealer. I even had randomly spent two points in two-handed weapons. The only weakness of that class: heavy armored enemies.

Overall, why pick the warrior over the rogue? Powerful specialisations, additional hitpoints and stamina. Still, they both have their own purpose, but after following a two-handed weapon fighter versus a dual-wielding fighter, I wonder if the dual-wielding fighter isn't better. Maybe not as much in a duel, but definitely in front of masses of opponents.

Modifié par BackwardCompatibility, 09 novembre 2009 - 04:19 .