Aller au contenu

Photo

Executing NPCs.


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
107 réponses à ce sujet

#26
Agent.0.Fortune

Agent.0.Fortune
  • Members
  • 140 messages
Yes. Kill everyone it is the only way to make sure the reapers don't get them. You have to look at the bigger picture.

I've decided the whole interupt system needs some work, especially the Renegade interupts. Its like Shepard goes completely mental... and you never really know what going to happen. Maybe he will make a joke at your expense, or maybe he will sodomize you with grenade launcher.

Reporter, punch her in the face, guess she was lucky i didn't kneecap her.
Veetor, turn off the screens (pretty much the same as the paragon option with less hugging)...
Grunt, shoot him in the face, hes a krogan its probably an improvement.
Moridin @ clinic, renegade interup to interupt Mordin's speech... really Shep you are a baddass.
Jack, forcing her to kill her fellow cerberus survivor on her loyalty mission
Fotilla, threatening to breath your nasty germs on their ship....

Modifié par Agent.0.Fortune, 11 avril 2010 - 11:23 .


#27
Daralii

Daralii
  • Members
  • 666 messages

The Angry One wrote...

Unit-Alpha wrote...

Give me the Bethesda system (Oblivion/Fallout 3): You can kill anyone unless they are essential to a future main mission. Bye bye, Turian councilor.


"Turian Councillor has been knocked unconcious"

Stop! You've violated the law!

....

Then pay with your blood!

#28
kglaser

kglaser
  • Members
  • 7 341 messages

Unit-Alpha wrote...

Give me the Bethesda system (Oblivion/Fallout 3): You can kill anyone unless they are essential to a future main mission. Bye bye, Turian councilor.


This.  THIS, THIS, THIS!

#29
Mir5

Mir5
  • Members
  • 253 messages

kglaser wrote...

Unit-Alpha wrote...

Give me the Bethesda system (Oblivion/Fallout 3): You can kill anyone unless they are essential to a future main mission. Bye bye, Turian councilor.


This.  THIS, THIS, THIS!


Can't see why everyone's getting so effed by this guy. At least he attacks you with honest direct approach while rest of the council just pretends to be nice while arrogantly ignoring you.

#30
Guest_Shandepared_*

Guest_Shandepared_*
  • Guests

Ray Joel Oh wrote...

No because I'm not a monster and I didn't shoot Wrex.

Shame on you.


Wrex brought it on himself. I wouldn't have shot him, but then he pulled a gun on me and threatened my mission. At that point I was executing a traitor.

#31
Speakeasy13

Speakeasy13
  • Members
  • 809 messages

Shandepared wrote...

Ray Joel Oh wrote...

No because I'm not a monster and I didn't shoot Wrex.

Shame on you.


Wrex brought it on himself. I wouldn't have shot him, but then he pulled a gun on me and threatened my mission. At that point I was executing a traitor.

Did he even say he was going to shoot you?

#32
Guest_Shandepared_*

Guest_Shandepared_*
  • Guests

Speakeasy13 wrote...

Did he even say he was going to shoot you?


No, but he pointed a gun at me and that implied that he was wiling to use it. I don't play chicken with mass accelerator rounds. I certainly don't give second chances to people who outright state they will not allow me to accomplish my mission (while pointing a gun at me, no less). I like Wrex, but he left my Shepard no choice.

#33
Speakeasy13

Speakeasy13
  • Members
  • 809 messages

Shandepared wrote...

Speakeasy13 wrote...

Did he even say he was going to shoot you?


No, but he pointed a gun at me and that implied that he was wiling to use it. I don't play chicken with mass accelerator rounds. I certainly don't give second chances to people who outright state they will not allow me to accomplish my mission (while pointing a gun at me, no less). I like Wrex, but he left my Shepard no choice.

If you had bothered to do his loyalty mission beforehand he would've suggested otherwise. Your Shepard had no choice if you A) failed to do that mission AND B) didn't have enough charm/intimidate skill. In either case it was YOU who failed him. Not the other way around. Blame yourself, not him.

If you liked someone and still fail to see things from his/her perspective in real life, that generally makes you a terrible person. It's a videogame, if you want to overcompensate it's fine, but don't rationalize biggotory. It's not good for your sanity.

Modifié par Speakeasy13, 12 avril 2010 - 03:15 .


#34
Guest_Shandepared_*

Guest_Shandepared_*
  • Guests

Speakeasy13 wrote...

If you had bothered to do his loyalty mission beforehand he would've suggested otherwise.


I did do his loyalty mission and he still pulled a gun on Shepard. That both shocked him and pissed him off. Thus Shepard told Wrex to stand down, that he was giving him an order. Instead Wrex got angrier and told him, and I quote, "This base can't be destroyed, I won't allow it!"

Their discussion ended there.

I could have still intimidated him, but when Shepard does that he lowers his weapon while Wrex continues pointing his gun at him. That is out of character for my Shepard. He is not going to lower his gun until the other party does. Thus the only in-character choice I had left was to shoot Wrex.

Speakeasy13 wrote...

If you liked someone and still fail to see things from his/her perspective in real life, that generally makes you a terrible person.


I can see it from his perspective. That changes nothing though. Just because I like someone doesn't mean I will tolerate them threatening my life and my mission.

I'm roleplayer, if you hadn't guessed.


Speakeasy13 wrote...

It's a videogame, if you want to overcompensate it's fine, but don't rationalize biggotory. It's not good for your mentality.


You don't know what biggotry is, kid.

#35
Speakeasy13

Speakeasy13
  • Members
  • 809 messages

Shandepared wrote...

I did do his loyalty mission and he still pulled a gun on Shepard. That both shocked him and pissed him off. Thus Shepard told Wrex to stand down, that he was giving him an order. Instead Wrex got angrier and told him, and I quote, "This base can't be destroyed, I won't allow it!"

Their discussion ended there.

I could have still intimidated him, but when Shepard does that he lowers his weapon while Wrex continues pointing his gun at him. That is out of character for my Shepard. He is not going to lower his gun until the other party does. Thus the only in-character choice I had left was to shoot Wrex.

He also said he considered you to be more than family.

In-character maybe, but by no means the best option (or morally correct). You may be pefectly coherent in rationalizing what was going on then, but in retrospective (which we are looking at here) it was a mistake. Objectively and emotionally. Your Shepard messed up. That's it. He didn't have to kill a friend, but ended up doing so.

I can see it from his perspective. That changes nothing though. Just because I like someone doesn't mean I will tolerate them threatening my life and my mission.

I'm roleplayer, if you hadn't guessed.

Alright, let's try to roleplay this Shepard of yours. What emotions were going through his head? Anger? Fear? Shock? Likely. Guilt? Maybe. You're not letting on any, which would suggest either denial or socialpathy. Which role would you prefer to play? The emo-kid or the lunatic? Remember there's no third option because this is how you chose to play the game (by not appearing to show remorse over the matter).

You don't know what biggotry is, kid.

- Constantly expressing your view in such a manner as if that is objectively correct and has no fault to be found.
- Outright stating that your opinion is the only one that matters to you.
- Refusal to address the possibility that you may be wrong.
- Repeated failure to consider or even finish reading others' postings before making a comeback
- Habitually using such "terms of endearment" as if others are of inferior status than you are.

Educate me. If that's not biggotry, what is?

Modifié par Speakeasy13, 12 avril 2010 - 03:44 .


#36
Nightwriter

Nightwriter
  • Members
  • 9 800 messages
Kay. So OP wants to be given more people to kill. Got it. Not enough slaughter.

#37
NICKjnp

NICKjnp
  • Members
  • 5 048 messages

kglaser wrote...

Unit-Alpha wrote...

Give me the Bethesda system (Oblivion/Fallout 3): You can kill anyone unless they are essential to a future main mission. Bye bye, Turian councilor.


This.  THIS, THIS, THIS!


You people sound like you came from third-world dictatorships.

#38
Speakeasy13

Speakeasy13
  • Members
  • 809 messages

Nightwriter wrote...

Kay. So OP wants to be given more people to kill. Got it. Not enough slaughter.

Well it's a game. Killing people is sort of the reason why we play this game. It's fun shooting at people alright. Why do people feel so insecure about themselves they need to rationalize their actions is what I don't get. It's a freakin' game.

#39
Calculatrice

Calculatrice
  • Members
  • 4 299 messages

The Angry One wrote...

Unit-Alpha wrote...

Give me the Bethesda system (Oblivion/Fallout 3): You can kill anyone unless they are essential to a future main mission. Bye bye, Turian councilor.


"Turian Councillor has been knocked unconcious"

Dammit!!

#40
Nightwriter

Nightwriter
  • Members
  • 9 800 messages

Speakeasy13 wrote...

Nightwriter wrote...

Kay. So OP wants to be given more people to kill. Got it. Not enough slaughter.

Well it's a game. Killing people is sort of the reason why we play this game. It's fun shooting at people alright. Why do people feel so insecure about themselves they need to rationalize their actions is what I don't get. It's a freakin' game.


... You mean, why do we have reasons for killing people?

Because... we should have reasons?

#41
Collider

Collider
  • Members
  • 17 165 messages
Lol I play this game to kill people? I played this game for the roleplaying aspects.Whether or not that includes killing people was not factored in.

#42
Speakeasy13

Speakeasy13
  • Members
  • 809 messages

Collider wrote...

Lol I play this game to kill people? I
played this game for the roleplaying aspects.Whether or not that
includes killing people was not factored in.

Nightwriter wrote...

Speakeasy13 wrote...

Nightwriter wrote...

Kay. So OP wants to be given more people to kill. Got it. Not enough slaughter.

Well it's a game. Killing people is sort of the reason why we play this game. It's fun shooting at people alright. Why do people feel so insecure about themselves they need to rationalize their actions is what I don't get. It's a freakin' game.


... You mean, why do we have reasons for killing people?

Because... we should have reasons?

Nah. Don't tell me you guys didn't create multiple Shepards and never felt the urge to shoot random ppl for fun.:devil:

Maybe not on your cannon Sheps (well not mine either). But don't you want to explore the possibilities?

#43
Guest_Shandepared_*

Guest_Shandepared_*
  • Guests

Speakeasy13 wrote...

He also said he considered you to be more than family.


That's not much consolation when he's comparing me to Saren and then pointing a gun at me. Considering the kind of family Wrex comes from I'm not sure that being considered among them (or even slightly above them) means very much.

Speakeasy13 wrote...

In-character maybe, but by no means the best option (or morally correct).


Shooting somebody who is pointing a gun at you is absolutely morally justifiable. Especially when they're enraged, big, and not a sworn to obey you. Recall that Wrex is just a merc. His loyalty can be considered rather informal.

Speakeasy13 wrote...

Alright, let's try to roleplay this Shepard of yours. What emotions were going through his head?


I'll give you the internal dialog I had going in my head.

"This isn't right, Shepard..."

"Easy, Wrex, I'm not the enemy here. Saren is the one you should be mad at."

"Really? Saren invented a cure for my people. You want to destroy it. Help me out here, Shepard, the lines between friend and foe are getting a little blurry..."

"I shouldn't have to explain that to you, Wrex!" Are you kidding me, after everything we've done together you're seriuosly considering jumping ship for Saren?

"Indulge me. If you can't give me a better reason to destroy the hopes of my people, then I'm through with you!" *Wrex pulls a gun*

Now my Shepard is really pissed. Not only is his friend turning on him, but now he's pointing a gun at him. He's challenging his authority, and that is unacceptable.

"All you need to know is I'm giving you an order to fall in line!" Stand down, you ****, before you get one us killed.

"So after all this time that's all I get from you? How can you not see what this means to the krogan?! This base can't be destroyed, I won't allow it!"

He's pointing a gun at me, talking about joining with Saren, and now he's saying I can't complete my mission...

*Shepard shoots Wrex to death* You ****.

He was sorry it came to that. Wrex was one of his friends, perhaps his best friend on the crew. However he doesn't tolerate friends pointing their guns at him, especially when they refuse to back down, sympathize with the enemy, and then stand against his mission. He had no choice but to shoot Wrex. Later he speculated that even if he'd somehow talked Wrex down that Wrex wouldn't have been trustworthy after that.

Speakeasy13 wrote...

- Constantly expressing your view in such a manner as if that is objectively correct and has no fault to be found.


Have you ever considered that I'm correct?

Speakeasy13 wrote...

- Outright stating that your opinion is the only one that matters to you.


Nothing to do with bigotry.

Speakeasy13 wrote...

- Refusal to address the possibility that you may be wrong.


You're not very introspective, are you?

Speakeasy13 wrote...

- Repeated failure to consider or even finish reading others' postings before making a comeback


Just don' t start your post with vulcans. In any case, this has nothing to do with bigotry.

Speakeasy13 wrote...

- Habitually using such "terms of endearment" as if others are of inferior status than you are.


That would only be bigtory if I were wrong.

Speakeasy 13 wrote...

Educate me. If that's not biggotry, what is?


A lack of tolerance and I tolerate quite a lot. I have and do consider other view points and more often than not I dismiss them because I see them as incorrect.

Modifié par Shandepared, 12 avril 2010 - 04:06 .


#44
Nightwriter

Nightwriter
  • Members
  • 9 800 messages

Speakeasy13 wrote...
Nah. Don't tell me you guys didn't create multiple Shepards and never felt the urge to shoot random ppl for fun.:devil:

Maybe not on your cannon Sheps (well not mine either). But don't you want to explore the possibilities?


Oh hell yes. I see what you're saying.

Yes, I've experimented with killing people. Not as much as others, though. I don't have a renegade character or a renegade playthrough.

It's because when I kill people for fun they're the ones that annoy me. More satisfying.

#45
Speakeasy13

Speakeasy13
  • Members
  • 809 messages
[quote]Shandepared wrote...

That's not much consolation when he's comparing me to Saren and then pointing a gun at me. Considering the kind of family Wrex comes from I'm not sure that being considered among them (or even slightly above them) means very much.[/quote]
Maybe it does, maybe it doesn't. Either way it's a clue that he still has friendly feelings for you. If you think shouldn't have to explain to him your actions, he shouldn't have to explain it to you either. Not after he's said those words.

[quote]

Shooting somebody who is pointing a gun at you is absolutely morally justifiable. Especially when they're enraged, big, and not a sworn to obey you. Recall that Wrex is just a merc. His loyalty can be considered rather informal.

I'll give you the internal dialog I had going in my head.

"This isn't right, Shepard..."

"Easy, Wrex, I'm not the enemy here. Saren is the one you should be mad at."

"Really? Saren invented a cure for my people. You want to destroy it. Help me out here, Shepard, the lines between friend and foe are getting a little blurry..."

"I shouldn't have to explain that to you, Wrex!" Are you kidding me, after everything we've done together you're seriuosly considering jumping ship for Saren?

"Indulge me. If you can't give me a better reason to destroy the hopes of my people, then I'm through with you!" *Wrex pulls a gun*

Now my Shepard is really pissed. Not only is his friend turning on him, but now he's pointing a gun at him. He's challenging his authority, and that is unacceptable.

"All you need to know is I'm giving you an order to fall in line!" Stand down, you ****, before you get one us killed.

"So after all this time that's all I get from you? How can you not see what this means to the krogan?! This base can't be destroyed, I won't allow it!"

He's pointing a gun at me, talking about joining with Saren, and now he's saying I can't complete my mission...

*Shepard shoots Wrex to death* You ****.

He was sorry it came to that. Wrex was one of his friends, perhaps his best friend on the crew. However he doesn't tolerate friends pointing their guns at him, especially when they refuse to back down, sympathize with the enemy, and then stand against his mission. He had no choice but to shoot Wrex. Later he speculated that even if he'd somehow talked Wrex down that Wrex wouldn't have been trustworthy after that. [/quote]
I wasn't bothered by you killing him (no one would know better unless in retrospective). But the absence of guilt. Because your Shepard was at least partially at fault. Wrex asked you to "indulge" him with an explanation, but even that you refused; you're asking to make the ultimate sacrifise to you, without offering any reassurance that his sacrifise will even be appreciated; surely he's wronged you as well by threatening to join Saren, but that's what compromise is for. That's what friends are for. You not only "tolerate", you forgive and sacrifice for each other.

Again I'm not saying that keeping Wrex is the only acceptable outcome. I'm saying that character flaws are what makes a story interesting, and therefore we should be honest about our m

[quote]Speakeasy13 wrote...

- Constantly expressing your view in such a manner as if that is objectively correct and has no fault to be found.[/quote]

Have you ever considered that I'm correct?[/quote]
I don't see everything as correct or incorrect. Everyone has their reasons. Well most of us anyway.

[quote]Speakeasy13 wrote...

- Outright stating that your opinion is the only one that matters to you.[/quote]

Nothing to do with bigotry.[/quote]
I'm sure most people will disagree with you on that one.

[quote]Speakeasy13 wrote...

- Refusal to address the possibility that you may be wrong.[/quote]

You're not very introspective, are you?[/quote]
There are plenty of occasions where I admit I'm wrong. Then again, I seldom challenge others' morals on a fundamental morals so I don't often have to prove myself correct or wrong.

[quote]Speakeasy13 wrote...

- Repeated failure to consider or even finish reading others' postings before making a comeback[/quote]

Just don' t start your post with vulcans. In any case, this has nothing to do with bigotry.[/quote]
Again, it does and most people will agree.

[quote]Speakeasy13 wrote...

- Habitually using such "terms of endearment" as if others are of inferior status than you are.[/quote]

That would only be bigtory if I were wrong.[/quote]
And exactly what makes you superior? That you're always right?

[quote]Speakeasy 13 wrote...

Educate me. If that's not biggotry, what is?[/quote]

A lack of tolerance and I tolerate quite a lot. I have and do consider other view points and more often than not I dismiss them because I see them as incorrect.

[/quote]
Tolerance is rather minimal. Tolerating others barely makes anyone a decent person. In fact, the very concept of tolerance suggests that you're viewing others in condescendance. It's such an honor you even allowed our existense by "tolerating" us!

Oh well, maybe biggot was not the best word I should've used. Arrogance and self-absorbance are probably the word I was looking for. There I just proved I am introspective. More than you anyway.

Modifié par Speakeasy13, 12 avril 2010 - 04:43 .


#46
Guest_Shandepared_*

Guest_Shandepared_*
  • Guests
[quote]Speakeasy13 wrote...

Maybe it does, maybe it doesn't. Either way it's a clue that he still has friendly feelings for you. If you think shouldn't have to explain to him your actions, he shouldn't have to explain it to you either. Not after he's said those words.[/quote]

Wrex pulled the gun, not Shepard. Once he did that all bets were off.

But the absence of guilt.[/quote]

As I said, he felt guilty about it and still regrets it but in the end he knows he did what he had to and that ultimately the fault lies with Wrex. My Shepard doesn't make "compromises" with anything that threatens the mission or symapthizes with the enemy. Wrex picked his side, and he paid for it.


(my frist playthrough and my original canon run I kept Wrex alive. However after an enlightening thread and some articles I read I decided that killing him was more compelling. Even before that I have always defended anyone who decided to shoot Wrex because once somebody starts pointing a gun at your head you can no longer reasonably trust them and to defend your own life you're entitled to shoot them. It irritates me thus when people call Ashley a murderer, but that's another topic)

[quote]Speakeasy13 wrote...

I don't see everything as correct or incorrect. Everyone has their reasons. Well most of us anyway.[/quote]

Pick a side, grow a spine.

[quote]Speakeasy13 wrote...

I'm sure most people will disagree with you on that one.[/quote]

They can kiss my butt.


[quote]Speakeasy13 wrote...

Again, it does and most people will agree.[/quote]

See the above.

[quote]Speakeasy13 wrote...

And exactly what makes you superior? That you're always right?[/quote]

Of-course, obviously.

[quote]Speakeasy13 wrote...

There I just proved I am introspective. More than you anyway.
[/quote]

You don't know, but if I had an appropriate emote right now I'd give you a cookie.

#47
Speakeasy13

Speakeasy13
  • Members
  • 809 messages
[quote]Shandepared wrote...

[quote]Speakeasy13 wrote...

Maybe it does, maybe it doesn't. Either way it's a clue that he still has friendly feelings for you. If you think shouldn't have to explain to him your actions, he shouldn't have to explain it to you either. Not after he's said those words.[/quote]

Wrex pulled the gun, not Shepard. Once he did that all bets were off.

But the absence of guilt.

As I said, he felt guilty about it and still regrets it but in the end he knows he did what he had to and that ultimately the fault lies with Wrex. My Shepard doesn't make "compromises" with anything that threatens the mission or symapthizes with the enemy. Wrex picked his side, and he paid for it.


(my frist playthrough and my original canon run I kept Wrex alive. However after an enlightening thread and some articles I read I decided that killing him was more compelling. Even before that I have always defended anyone who decided to shoot Wrex because once somebody starts pointing a gun at your head you can no longer reasonably trust them and to defend your own life you're entitled to shoot them. It irritates me thus when people call Ashley a murderer, but that's another topic)[/quote][/quote]

Fair enough. I'm willing to bet you 1 credit chit you'd still envy others when they bromance Wrex on Tuchanka though.

Ultimately that's all that matters. How you FEEL about it.

[quote]Speakeasy13 wrote...

I don't see everything as correct or incorrect. Everyone has their reasons. Well most of us anyway.[/quote]

Pick a side, grow a spine.[/quote][/quote]
Oh I have enough of a spine to defend my point of view. Why the hell else are we having this conversation?

And what side am I on? The side that says "you should never force others to pick your side".

[quote][quote]Speakeasy13 wrote...

I'm sure most people will disagree with you on that one.[/quote]

They can kiss my butt.


[quote]Speakeasy13 wrote...

Again, it does and most people will agree.[/quote]

See the above.


[quote]Speakeasy13 wrote...

And exactly what makes you superior? That you're always right?[/quote]

Of-course, obviously. [/quote]
*Points back at above comment about arrogance and self-absorbance.*

Growing a spine is so easy. Humility and understanding is the hard part, kid. And until you learn that stop calling others "kid" because they may very well be more mature than you.

Modifié par Speakeasy13, 12 avril 2010 - 05:09 .


#48
noobzor99

noobzor99
  • Members
  • 331 messages
It would be nice to at least be able to kill the people you can already kill through a renegade interrupt, as if you miss it you have to let them walk away...

#49
Guest_Shandepared_*

Guest_Shandepared_*
  • Guests

Speakeasy13 wrote...

Growing a spine is so easy. Humility and understanding is the hard part, kid. And until you learn that stop calling others "kid" because they may very well be more mature than you.


If I meet someone like that then I might reconsider. So far that doesn't seem likely.

#50
Nightwriter

Nightwriter
  • Members
  • 9 800 messages
Shand, this is like your relationship with everyone in the game.



Posted Image