My impression is that he does in fact call his guards, because you say to him "call of your guards, and we will settle this honorably." If the landsmeet has voted against him that is.KnightofPhoenix wrote...
LadyDamodred wrote...
Hypocrisy? I don't think so. Loghain responds to the challenge of his power by ordering executions. 1) That's not his right and 2) that also goes against the tradtion of the Landsmeet. The point was to end the civil war. Each side put forth a candidate and let the Landsmeet choose. Was Loghain also going to execute anyone else who stood with us? We certainly didn't hold it against those who stood with him when we won. *shrugs*
You don't know if Loghain would have executed those who stood with us.
The point was, Loghain asked for a duel and did not call his men to fight (although apparently that could happen? I never had it happen to me). Eammon on the otherhand doesn't even try to call for a duel and calls his men to fight the Landsmeet, while also claiming he cares about it. Obviously that's hypocracy.
If the Landsmeet rejected him, it's not his right to declare war on it, epecially not when the whole point was to end the civil war.
What Loghain did is irrelevent. Eammon is claiming that one should not sacrifice what "Ferelden is" in order to end the civil war, but yet has no problem doing it when the Landsmeet sides against him.
Modifié par cmessaz, 18 avril 2010 - 03:37 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut






