Addai67 wrote...
Zyanic wrote...
@ grumpy,
I was gonna post in response to your original Zev comment but I went off on a rant and thought better of it. I think Leliana's romance was a lot more natural than Zevran's although I haven't ever played as a Male PC romancing Zev, I didn't realise he still told you he preferred women. By more natural I mean she didn't seem to see the need to point out that she liked women or men to you. If I can remember rightly the PC was the one to question her over whether she was interested in a romantic fashion ( from female PC anyway, again never managed to play a male past getting Morrigan in the tent) and then either shoot her down or return the interest. Been a while since I successfully romanced either of them though ( see earlier thread comment)
Anyway the reason I got all ranty earlier was that I really don't see why any kind of gender barriers should be put on the love interests in a single player game if the romances are going to be in it at all, What difference does it make, really?
I have of course worded that terribly.
My point was that it made them more realistic characters. Some people are just straight. Otherwise it's like the criticism you often hear that it's just a dating sim rather than a story you are part of. If the companions are infinitely malleable, they are not "real."
Leliana seems to prefer women, too, or that's my impression. I really think it's the male heterosexual players who got the short end of the stick in DAO.
Although I think a lot of people convince themselves that Leliana is a nice, sweet, girl next door (who just happens to have been an assassin).
I like Morrigan's romance. There again, the limits are refreshing. She will not do the threesome come hell or high water. I squee'ed at her "if you come back stinking of sea water I'll never touch you again... I do not share." My kind of girl. 
I agree that in a sense it makes them more realistic, but on the flip side of that you also get gay/bisexual people of all personalities. If it's going to be included at all, then I just don't see the point in assigning barriers to a single player game. It doesn't have any effect on me if a man wants to romance Alistair in his playthrough so why shouldn't he be able to.
@ Sarah, I just find it a little unnessecary for it to have been mentioned at all to be honest. If I was a male player romancing Zevran I
imagine I'd have felt it a bit " Gee thanks Zev " I agree it's not exactly forced in a player's face but it's just a niggle of mine, it feels...urgh.
If I had been romancing Alistair and then the same conversation had came up, with the roles reversed, if he had felt the need to tell me he preferred men, but then happily continued his relationship with my character then I dunno... It just seems a little... tactless? I guess is maybe the word I'm looking for. Perhaps it's the sort of revelation that should be saved for much later in a relationship once both parties are secure in their love for each other.
It could be argued that this is part of Zevran's character I suppose,
Blargh, This is why I should never get myself involved in these kind of discussions.
No offence to anyone was meant with
any of the above, Just my brain rambling away as usual.
Here's a humourous picture of Alistair.

I have absolutely
no idea what he was doing there.