KnightofPhoenix wrote...
Lady Jess wrote...
Holy maker, I just finished Ostagar on my Dalish, who I thought would have no real reason to execute Loghain. Then I let the cutscene play after the beacon, which I'd been skipping. I paid attention, to the torch lights in the distance. I watched them stay still, until Loghain called the retreat. Then I watched them all move with the visible troops. We really COULD have won the battle. He really DID leave us to die. And his men really COULD have made the difference.
No, it is definately not certain that the battle was winnable. RtO hints heavily at it. Even Cailan knew that the probability of losing was great. The mages scattered easily and Cailan's position was overwhelmed.
And David Gaider also commented that the darkspawn were much more numerous than expected at Ostagar, in addition to being smarter (preempting against the beacon). So victory was surely not assured had Loghain acted. And if he did join and lost, then Ferelden effectively lost all of its army, instead of a part of it.
So you say it is quite possible that Loghain made the right decision? If you look at his track record after that,
--poisoning Arl Eamon...blaming the Wardens....among others, do you
really think he made that decision because it was the "right" thing to
do? Seems like he was after the thrown and
stopped at nothing to gain power. You think he did all that for the greater cause of saving Ferelden?
on an opposite note, I also noticed that he could have retreated earlier, but he *waited* for the beacon to be lit, possibly assesing the battle, then deciding whether to attack or not.
--confused...




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut











