CptPatch wrote...
I was going to respond to correct one misconception, but I see other things as well, sooooomonochrome2 wrote...
I agree that the contest was not ran as well as it should have been even though I did win a prize. I hated spamming but I did it. Is it because I am an ugly American? I think not, as Bioware is Canadian and their contest rules are what caused the spamming in fact that was the entire point of that part of the contest was to SPAM,SPAM,SPAM.
As has been mentioned by others captain hypocrite has his article published on a click me click me site for paid ads and continues to spam these forums with his link. The difference is that he is PAID to do it and maybe that is the irritation? That some people will do for free what you do for money? It also makes at least a few of your points less valid when you are guilty of them yourself, the old do as I say not as I do doesn’t work with children and it doesn’t work with adults.
Last but not least Captain Patch has at least 2 points of incorrect logic in his article.
1.) How would multiple email addresses help? Sure you can get the free quiz points without registering your games and you can get the referral link points but you also needed to twitter points to win which means each bogus email account would also need a bogus twitter account. If people are willing to go to that much effort to win while you don’t want to participate what is the problem? If you don’t want to fully participate in something why are you surprised when you are beaten by people that are willing to?
2.) Insinuating that you are less of a fan because you don’t have multiple registered copies of games is ridiculous. First bioware allows you to only have ME2,DAO and DAO Awakenings right now under your registered profile. You could still have Baldurs Gate ,ME1, Jade Empire, KOTOR and everyother bioware game and have 0 under your registered games so this is an absolutely useless statistic.
1) NOBODY at HookedGamers receives a wage, salary, or commission. The ad revenue (which amounts to next to nothing) is used to offset the cost of having the site hosted on a server. If you want to look for sites with paid writers and/or bloggers, look for the staffers at N4G, GameSpy, GameSpot, etc.
2) The reason the article is itself posted in it's entirety elsewhere is because it's too frickin' long. There simply isn't enough room in a thread post to layout that much material (or s***, as I'm sure many of you mentally substituted).
3) The ONLY threads that I have "spammed" here have been Bazaar/auction threads. Furthermore, unlike many other actual spammers, they were on threads where I had already been engaged in discussions on those threads. The exception being a thread I initiated for the explicit purpose of giving BW members access to the article. Obviously, many of you hold STRONG opinions that are about as opposite as you can get, and really do NOT want to hear/read anything I might have to say. The fine; your perogative and right. By presenting you with a hyperlink instead of 36 column-inches of vitriol, reading my critique/opinion piece is entirely voluntary on your part. In other words, I "spammed" you with a link. Would you actually prefer to find a 3-foot long post on this thread?
4) Lastly, no one actually needed a Twitter account to be a winner. Quite a few winners never won a Challenge to help boost their totals. No doubt, winning a Challenge would help boost one's tokens significantly, but as far as I know, no one made their winning bid based primarily on their 5950 base + Challenge wins. Correct me if I'm wrong: did any of you have more Challenge win tokens than you had referral click tokens? (Wouldn't mind learning who had the most Challenge wins and what that number was.)
Just for fun, where was the wonderful contribution and
conversation to this thread BEFORE you spammed your link? I think
this link was about shipping of Bazzar items? Where did the OP or anyone else
ask for your diatribe on this thread? Ring ring , pot calling kettle.
I read your entire article and it had some valid points I am
not saying it didn't. However when you wish to call an entire country
"UGLY" just to get a few clicks on you blog that is subsidized by ad
revenue when the article says how horrible it is for people to spam links to
get clicks. Sorry but it comes across as self serving and hypocritical.
While no one needed a twitter account to be a winner one could also argue that
if you won a lot of twitter challenges then you would not need to spam either
wouldn't this make your largest grievance no longer a grievance? I guess my biggest issue is that some of your premises were false and you didn't take the time or make the effort to correct them, you just wanted to sound off on how unfair the world was.
Modifié par monochrome2, 12 avril 2010 - 07:22 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut






