Don't worry about the quantum entanglement issue. Watch this clip: The Science of Mass Effect 2. Not all is lost. At least one scientist is still supporting it.HeyBlade789 wrote...
Its nice to see some truth, but im upset about quantum entanglement, i really liked this idea
Modifié par AngryFrozenWater, 15 avril 2010 - 01:43 .
Lord Coake wrote...
Massive Gamma Ray Bursts (GRB's) of the largest variety flat out violate the speed limit through sheer AWESOME power output. Their discovery, and the proof of just how godawful fast they can move tossed a gigormous moneky wrench into our current interpretation of physics. The two GRB's noted to actually generate a beam of concentrated gamma rays moving at FTL speeds were the result of hidsously Supermassive stars** grew so huge that singularies formed at their centers.
How about creating a mass effect field by feeding it dark energy? According to Dr Michio Kaku (link in my post above) maybe negative energy (which dark energy may or may not be) is required to open and maintain worm holes. If you use a similar process to cancel some of the curvature near a black hole then maybe... What am I babbling about? These are super massive black holes. I think surviving those is one of the few things that smells like fantasy.Dethateer wrote...
I'm more interested as to why the black holes at the cores of these "supermassive stars" don't suck the matter of the stars into them.
Modifié par AngryFrozenWater, 15 avril 2010 - 06:05 .
That's a good question. I've read recently that theoretical physicists are creating a simulation of that using a super computer. I think the results are not in yet.Dethateer wrote...
Hm, well, on the subject, what would happen if you got two black holes close together (besides absorbing each other, we're assuming that doesn't happen) and shoved a body at an equal distance from the core of each one?
Modifié par AngryFrozenWater, 15 avril 2010 - 06:11 .
If you are interested I can dig up an interview with a physicist about that subject.Dethateer wrote...
Better yet, would they actually absorb each other?
I've found it. Unlike what I wrote earlier results are in and Kip Thorne didn't have anything to do with it. In short this is it...Dethateer wrote...
Better yet, would they actually absorb each other?
Modifié par AngryFrozenWater, 16 avril 2010 - 09:33 .
I swear I've read a few article about the mass of particle being reduced. Not with Eezo of course but reduced all the same.Conman013 wrote...
Dethateer wrote...
It's not possible because the mass of a substance cannot be changed.
My apologese, I should have said believeable instead of possible. Poor choice of wording on my part. But yes, it isn't possible due to the fact that mass cannot change. It's still believeable though, which makes it fun.
Wormholes? Are you new?Chris H. Fleming wrote...
The FTL travel in ME is via worm holes, so there is no violation of the speed of light. They don't travel faster than c, but create a shortcut in the universe.
PS: mass can most certainly be destroyed, e.g. electron + positron, and mc^2 is rest mass only.
Certain quasars and even galaxies can appear to be going at 8 times the speed of llight because of our relative motion and the angle the light arrives, but it is an optical illusionabstractwhiz wrote...
Lord Coake wrote...
Massive Gamma Ray Bursts (GRB's) of the largest variety flat out violate the speed limit through sheer AWESOME power output. Their discovery, and the proof of just how godawful fast they can move tossed a gigormous moneky wrench into our current interpretation of physics. The two GRB's noted to actually generate a beam of concentrated gamma rays moving at FTL speeds were the result of hidsously Supermassive stars** grew so huge that singularies formed at their centers.
Wait, where did you read this? I've never heard of any FTL phenomena on such a large scale. Besides, gamma rays are just electromagnetic radiation, and always move at lightspeed anyway. Sheer power output shouldn't have anything to do with it.
Source please.
The black holes are formed after the stars go supernova. They don't reside in the star while it still does fusion, which is what keeps it from collapsing in on itselfDethateer wrote...
I'm more interested as to why the black holes at the cores of these "supermassive stars" don't suck the matter of the stars into them.
AngryFrozenWater wrote...
How about creating a mass effect field by feeding it dark energy? According to Dr Michio Kaku (link in my post above) maybe negative energy (which dark energy may or may not be) is required to open and maintain worm holes. If you use a similar process to cancel some of the curvature near a black hole then maybe... What am I babbling about? These are super massive black holes. I think surviving those is one of the few things that smells like fantasy.Dethateer wrote...
I'm more interested as to why the black holes at the cores of these "supermassive stars" don't suck the matter of the stars into them.
Dethateer wrote...
Hm, well, on the subject, what would happen if you got two black holes close together (besides absorbing each other, we're assuming that doesn't happen) and shoved a body at an equal distance from the core of each one?
Michio Kaku also has a book that further describes all those things (Physics of the Impossible), which is a good read if you're into Sci-Fi at all.AngryFrozenWater wrote...
Don't worry about the quantum entanglement issue. Watch this clip: The Science of Mass Effect 2. Not all is lost. At least one scientist is still supporting it.HeyBlade789 wrote...
Its nice to see some truth, but im upset about quantum entanglement, i really liked this idea
In this clip theoretical physicist Dr Michio Kaku addresses also things like biotics, invisibility, force fields, and other Mass Effect 2 SF stuff.
Chances of that happening are slim. Kip Thorn says that the earlier idea that "the traveller" would become infinitely thin and long or that one could pass are both unlikely. Instead forces would rip the traveller appart from all sides. He says that in reality we now know that one would be stretched and squeezed from all sides in a chaotic manner and at an ever increasing rate. One would die.Noble 1 wrote...
AngryFrozenWater wrote...
How about creating a mass effect field by feeding it dark energy? According to Dr Michio Kaku (link in my post above) maybe negative energy (which dark energy may or may not be) is required to open and maintain worm holes. If you use a similar process to cancel some of the curvature near a black hole then maybe... What am I babbling about? These are super massive black holes. I think surviving those is one of the few things that smells like fantasy.Dethateer wrote...
I'm more interested as to why the black holes at the cores of these "supermassive stars" don't suck the matter of the stars into them.
Black holes, if spinning while they are formed can form the shape of a ring. It would be quite safe to pass through the center of this ring. Also, I have read that one passing through should not expect to come out the other side in the same region of space or even in the same time
Modifié par AngryFrozenWater, 16 avril 2010 - 05:37 .
Noble 1 wrote...
Black holes, if spinning while they are formed can form the shape of a ring. It would be quite safe to pass through the center of this ring. Also, I have read that one passing through should not expect to come out the other side in the same region of space or even in the same time
Yeah. He does a good job in trying to explain stuff in terms like we can understand. But the problem is that things are rapidly changing in the past two decades, so one has to be careful with his older publications.Ecael wrote...
Michio Kaku also has a book that further describes all those things (Physics of the Impossible), which is a good read if you're into Sci-Fi at all.AngryFrozenWater wrote...
Don't worry about the quantum entanglement issue. Watch this clip: The Science of Mass Effect 2. Not all is lost. At least one scientist is still supporting it.HeyBlade789 wrote...
Its nice to see some truth, but im upset about quantum entanglement, i really liked this idea
In this clip theoretical physicist Dr Michio Kaku addresses also things like biotics, invisibility, force fields, and other Mass Effect 2 SF stuff.
Noble 1 wrote...
The black holes are formed after the stars go supernova. They don't reside in the star while it still does fusion, which is what keeps it from collapsing in on itselfDethateer wrote...
I'm more interested as to why the black holes at the cores of these "supermassive stars" don't suck the matter of the stars into them.
Noble 1 wrote...
Dethateer wrote...
Hm, well, on the subject, what would happen if you got two black holes close together (besides absorbing each other, we're assuming that doesn't happen) and shoved a body at an equal distance from the core of each one?
The body, say a comet or planet, would split and each half would enter the hole it is closest too.
In the post above yours I've posted a link to an interview with Kip Thorn. He studied at the university to which Kerr was connected at the time Kerr dreamed up his theory. Kip Thorn says that these black holes are real, but unsuitable to travel though space or time. In fact in part 2 of that interview he tells that the super massive black hole at the center of our galaxy is a Kerr black hole. According to Thorn it's center (the singularity) warps spacetime into time and that causes that anything inside its horizon cannot escape and will be sucked into the singularity. Because of its spin the spacetime around that black hole warps violently and is responsible for a quasar that spits out giant beams of energy.SuperMedbh wrote...
Noble 1 wrote...
Black holes, if spinning while they are formed can form the shape of a ring. It would be quite safe to pass through the center of this ring. Also, I have read that one passing through should not expect to come out the other side in the same region of space or even in the same time
These are called Kerr black holes, and unfortunately they're (probably) unstable once outside influences are introduced:
http://www.daviddarl...black_hole.html
Modifié par AngryFrozenWater, 16 avril 2010 - 10:19 .
Retour en haut