663 réponses à ce sujet

[Symbolz]

Tucker did it!

[marbatico]

''dont let that stop you from smearing it all over you.''

[chiliztri]

Go Fetch Louis!

[Symbolz]

chiliztri wrote...

Go Fetch Louis!

  Wow...that was win.

[addiction21]

Symbol117 wrote...

chiliztri wrote...

Go Fetch Louis!

  Wow...that was win.

Office...

[JRCHOharry]

DrathanGervaise wrote...

DON'T SPOOK THE WITCH!

'Whoops..'

Goddammit Francis!

[Giant ambush beetle]

Symbol117 wrote..

No it doesn't but lets just look at the fact that guns do run out of ammo.  In a CQB situation I'd much rather have melee weapons then having to reload a gun.  Besides you don't need to kill the zombie in melee - disabling it so it can't move as fast or grab you is just as good.  The objective is survival.  Fleeing an area while disabling zombies works just as well, imo.  That's why for my weaponary I'm including dual kukris on top of any guns.

In my tac vest I can carry 400 rounds of .308. If I need more than 400 rounds (excluding backpack) I am screwed anyway, the best sword wouldn't help me out such a situation - because I am obviously fighting against a whole city full of zombies. 

Spear is a good idea, just aim for the head.

Modifié par The Woldan , 15 avril 2010 - 08:29 .

[Giant ambush beetle]

Shotgun is a bad idea because the ammo is just too heavy and bulky. You wont be able to carry enough of it to last a single night in a zombie infested area. 7.62x51 is half the size and weight and its still as effective.

[marbatico]

awesome left 4 dead quote:

Louis: [a Tank is charging] Run or shoot?

[pause]

Louis: RUN OR SHOOT?

Bill: Both!

[Statulos]

chiliztri wrote...

I disagree.

A banjo would be the next best weapon.

Only if you´re Woody Harrelson. Because for the rest; blugrass is an effective weapon against the living; not the undead.

[Symbolz]

The Woldan wrote...

Symbol117 wrote..

No it doesn't but lets just look at the fact that guns do run out of ammo.  In a CQB situation I'd much rather have melee weapons then having to reload a gun.  Besides you don't need to kill the zombie in melee - disabling it so it can't move as fast or grab you is just as good.  The objective is survival.  Fleeing an area while disabling zombies works just as well, imo.  That's why for my weaponary I'm including dual kukris on top of any guns.

In my tac vest I can carry 400 rounds of .308. If I need more than 400 rounds (excluding backpack) I am screwed anyway, the best sword wouldn't help me out such a situation - because I am obviously fighting against a whole city full of zombies. 

Spear is a good idea, just aim for the head.

You're screwed to begin with in a zombie world - so many zombies, so few bullets.    And .308 rounds?  Are you trying to take down an elephant zombie?   But overkill, imo.  But whatever floats your boat.

Personally I would never use any melee weapon that could not be used in very tight quarters, this includes most swords.  That's why I prefer knives.  Yeah it has little reach but I would try to make up for that in mobility.  That's my theory.

[Statulos]

Knives to not crack a skull easily. Try with a hammer or a crowbar.

[addiction21]

Statulos wrote...

Knives to not crack a skull easily. Try with a hammer or a crowbar.

[Symbolz]

Statulos wrote...

Knives to not crack a skull easily. Try with a hammer or a crowbar.

Some specs:

Blade: 12"
Overall: 17"
Thick: 5/16"
Weight: 22oz.

Gives enough reach to be effective for both cut or smashing with the spine of the blade.  Has enough weight where it can crack, if not crush, a skull, but still light enough for easy mobility.

Modifié par Symbol117, 15 avril 2010 - 08:52 .

[Symbolz]

addiction21 wrote...

Statulos wrote...

Knives to not crack a skull easily. Try with a hammer or a crowbar.

No waffle iron with a scope?

[Symbolz]

MrHimuraChan wrote...

The best weapon would be a Bagpipe. With my playing skills i could make the zombies commit mass suicide, lol

Or cause all the Scottish zombies to unite, ye fool!  ACK! 

[Statulos]

Symbol117 wrote...

Statulos wrote...

Knives to not crack a skull easily. Try with a hammer or a crowbar.

Some specs:

Blade: 12"
Overall: 17"
Thick: 5/16"
Weight: 22oz.

Gives enough reach to be effective for both cut or smashing with the spine of the blade.  Has enough weight where it can crack, if not crush, a skull, but still light enough for easy mobility.

A kukri hardly fits the definition of knife. Due to how the main mass and where the center of gravity is placed, it is closer to an axe.

[Symbolz]

Statulos wrote...

Symbol117 wrote...

Statulos wrote...

Knives to not crack a skull easily. Try with a hammer or a crowbar.

Some specs:

Blade: 12"
Overall: 17"
Thick: 5/16"
Weight: 22oz.

Gives enough reach to be effective for both cut or smashing with the spine of the blade.  Has enough weight where it can crack, if not crush, a skull, but still light enough for easy mobility.

A kukri hardly fits the definition of knife. Due to how the main mass and where the center of gravity is placed, it is closer to an axe.

But it's not an axe.    Looks like a knife, acts like a knife, cuts like a knife...so...must be a knife.

[Giant ambush beetle]

Close quarter battles with meele weapons is definitely a job for the falchion: 

Modifié par The Woldan , 15 avril 2010 - 09:04 .

[Giant ambush beetle]

MrHimuraChan wrote...

@The Woldan - This must be the most badass blade i've ever seen @_@

This: Two handed Falchion/messer
Cutting zombies in half since 15th century. 

Modifié par The Woldan , 15 avril 2010 - 09:12 .

[Symbolz]

If I had to pull out a sword, the Buster is coming out. But that two handed sword looks nice, Woldan.