c3pu2 wrote...
yea bought da2 day 1 what a mistaque got lucky though 2 playtru and no game breaking bug and did a lot of modding. yes i know it took me 2 play tru to realise it was bad
Yeah, I lucked out and missed the slow down ((Isabella) glitch; so made it through the first time, but there were enough issues with the game to make me very wary of Biowares next launch.
c3pu2 wrote...
dont know if you guys speak french but just sa this: www.jeuxvideo.com/news/2011/00054397-mass-effect-3-un-multijoueur-tres-optionnel.htm they kinda realised it was a ****ing bad idea and now looks like they dont know what to say or do to me the only solution is to tell bioware montreal thank you guys but you trow it all away and from now on you help us with the solo
I translated with babel fish. Oops!
I'm really starting to wonder about the mentality of some the people involved in games today.
Releasing ******-poor DLC just so you can have an actress with some nerd-cred, I'm looking at you Mark of the Assassin. WTF?
Taking a game that is entirely single player and NOT a great third party shooter (it's good enough for single player) and bolting on some multiplayer stuff just for the sake of it? WHY?
I've spent god knows how many hours building teams and schmoozing utter bastards to get the galaxy on my side in the fight to come and now suddenly I need to play multiplayer to get the best chance of winning? Jesus f-me sideways, what are you thinking?
An idea that
should have occurred to Bioware is to follow the example of
Case Zero - release the multiplayer bit as download only for $10 a couple of months before ME3 as a demo/introduction for new players which then gives you a couple of bonuses in the game when released - I think that may have been the acceptable face of ME multiplayer, but this? When do I play it? before ME3? during ME3?