Loghain and Return to Ostagar (DLC)
#1
Posté 17 avril 2010 - 12:37
then done the Return to Ostagar DLC? It would be interesting to see his
reaction to the return and finding Cailan's corpse.
#2
Posté 17 avril 2010 - 12:40
#3
Posté 17 avril 2010 - 12:43
And Wynne, of course, was awful. Her condemning Loghain for Ostagar was so annoying I actually started to see Loghain's POV.
#4
Posté 17 avril 2010 - 01:00
Sarah1281's theory does seem likely - Loghain putting two and two together and making five.
Anora sending the Warden Loghain to Orlais in Awakening would be a good idea. He's paranoid and obsessed and like Alistair said he thinks he's the only one who can fix things. Some time surrounded by Orlesians might do him some good.
I kill him most of the time, because he's unable to see any point of view other than his own.
#5
Posté 17 avril 2010 - 01:14
Dog's howl when youi take down Cailan's body was the most touching thing about it for me. I Rped it as my PC was putting to rest not just Cailan but that part of her life and her family (HNF) at the same time. (To explain the sadface over a man she barely knew).
#6
Posté 17 avril 2010 - 02:51
#7
Posté 17 avril 2010 - 04:24
#8
Posté 17 avril 2010 - 04:36
#9
Posté 17 avril 2010 - 04:38
#10
Posté 17 avril 2010 - 04:47
I guess that was Loghain's way of getting Cailan out of his way, so he could do things the way he saw fit.
#11
Posté 17 avril 2010 - 04:51
As the poster above mentioned, Loghain goes nuts over the letters you find in Cailan's chest. Is chiefly concerned with Maric's sword when you meet Cailan's confident to get the return to Ostagar quest.
But he and Wynn provide a running commentary if you have them both in the party as you go through Ostagar. You generally get the impression that, 1) Loghain really hated Cailan, 2) Loghain is really happy that Cailan is dead, and 3) Whatever remorse Loghain feels about the entire thing is restricted to the men he had to sacrifice.
#12
Posté 17 avril 2010 - 04:57
#13
Posté 17 avril 2010 - 05:26
Why should he feel remorse for abandoning that idiot Cailan to die, after telling him it was too dangerous to fight the darkspawn?
Loghain favoured leaving Cailan's body to the wolves... I found this a little weird and extrem
To give Cailan a pyre means you respected the man. I certainly don't respect a idiot who can't even realize he is playing with the lives of hundreds/thousands of soldiers, and doesn't care he might lose a great deal of them.
Extreme is leaving him for the darkspawn.
#14
Posté 17 avril 2010 - 05:43
You would place the blame on Cailan? a king whose authority was undermined by Loghain and his daughter at every turn? one who was smart enough to put aside the differences in the past and negotiate an alliance with Orle? (tell me this, if Cailan was such a glory seeking person, why would he do this? clearly he had a better idea of the darkspawn threat than Loghain)
Loghain is the one that couldn't see past his hatred of Orleis and betrayed his king and men at Ostagar.
Modifié par zchen, 17 avril 2010 - 05:55 .
#15
Posté 17 avril 2010 - 06:24
Perhaps you should listen to the dialog more carefully at the start of the game.
PC: He would, if he were not such a fool.
Duncan: Do not speak of the king such, he is.....overeager perhaps. Nevertheless we must look to Teryn Loghain to make the difference.
Alistair: Don't expect the king to win the battle.
Loghain: Pray that our king is malleable to wisdom, if your the praying sort.
PC: And if he isn't?
Loghain: Then simply pray.
I don't know what kind of ( retarded ) thinking you are playing at. But when your general, who has won against almost impossible odds in the past ( think of Loghain as you will, but he did win great victories ), suggest the battle is too dangerous then you should bloody ****ing listen.
When the Grey Warden Commander expresses concern over the coming battle you do NOT ignore his advice.
As for the whole Orlais aid thing. Might I ask why is Cailan so eager to get aid from Orlais, BUT NOT gather his full army. We hear Duncan at the start reminding Cailan that Redcliff soldiers are only a week away, and yet Cailan doesn't care.
So if he was eager to get a large fighting force, then why pray didn't he gather one from his OWN country? Inviting Orlesian forces had NOTHING to do with fighting the Blight, as Cailan did not deem a great threat enough, hell he doesn't even believe it is an actual Blight.
Modifié par Costin_Razvan, 17 avril 2010 - 06:28 .
#16
Posté 17 avril 2010 - 06:42
Also, you missed the line where Duncan said "The plan will work, your majesty."
They won a few battles already at Ostagar already, if not for Loghain's trecherorus abandonment, they would've held at Ostagar, had Orlesian reinforcements. A much better position than civil war.
Modifié par zchen, 17 avril 2010 - 06:47 .
#17
Posté 17 avril 2010 - 06:43
#18
Posté 17 avril 2010 - 06:45
#19
Posté 17 avril 2010 - 06:47
Cailan was doing a perfectly good job follow Loghain's plans.
If you don't make a stand at Ostagar, you are exposing Ferelden to the darkspawn, so truly how many choices did Cailan have? Unlike Logahin, who seemed perfectly willing to leave the people to darkspawn, Cailan took the fight to the frontlines.
Modifié par zchen, 17 avril 2010 - 06:50 .
#20
Posté 17 avril 2010 - 06:51
Modifié par Tinnic, 17 avril 2010 - 06:52 .
#21
Posté 17 avril 2010 - 07:01
Actually, if you really wanna blame somebody, blame the chantry.. if they'd just let the mage signal Loghain, everything would have been fine
#22
Posté 17 avril 2010 - 07:05
zchen wrote...
Again, who came up with the battle plan and sabotaged it? Loghain.
Also, you missed the line where Duncan said "The plan will work, your majesty."
They won a few battles already at Ostagar already, if not for Loghain's trecherorus abandonment, they would've held at Ostagar, had Orlesian reinforcements. A much better position than civil war.
Loghain sabatoged nothing. Allistair himself points out when you kill the ogre in the Tower of Ishal that you're already late, and it was a very tightly knit battle plan. If you want to blame someone for sabotaging that battle, blem the Revered Mother who blocked Uldred's plan of using the mages to send the signal instead of using the tower. Hell, blame the Chantry in general, as they would only let 7 mages leave the tower to go to Ostagar at the kings request.
Also, it's not Orlesian Chevaliers Cailan wanted to wait for, it was specificaly Orelsian Wardens he wanted to wait for.
#23
Posté 17 avril 2010 - 07:06
Caldarin V wrote...
Loghain didn't sabotage it; you lit the beacon late. The darkspawn tunneled up through the floor and took the tower; he had no way to predict that.
Actually, if you really wanna blame somebody, blame the chantry.. if they'd just let the mage signal Loghain, everything would have been fine
That wouldn't have worked either because the mage who wanted to light the beacon also wanted the battle to go badly and also pulled out early with his faction so he could stage a coup in the tower.
#24
Posté 17 avril 2010 - 07:06
Loghain was a wretched fool for what he did, but I don't really blame him for it either. Cailan was such a complete idiot.
Bad timing all around though.
#25
Posté 17 avril 2010 - 07:07
Tinnic wrote...
Caldarin V wrote...
Loghain didn't sabotage it; you lit the beacon late. The darkspawn tunneled up through the floor and took the tower; he had no way to predict that.
Actually, if you really wanna blame somebody, blame the chantry.. if they'd just let the mage signal Loghain, everything would have been fine
That wouldn't have worked either because the mage who wanted to light the beacon also wanted the battle to go badly and also pulled out early with his faction so he could stage a coup in the tower.
wait, ****, was that Uldred? wow... never noticed
touche





Retour en haut






