Genetic variance?
#126
Posté 19 avril 2010 - 01:40
#127
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
Posté 19 avril 2010 - 01:42
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
Onyx Jaguar wrote...
Our lone moderator is obsessed with the save editor atm
#128
Posté 19 avril 2010 - 01:44
Well, I didn't see it per se ... but I reported 'em, and they disappeared, so I'm just gonna assume ..
#129
Posté 19 avril 2010 - 01:44
Actually, reading this post again motivated me to make another truthful image, just for you(r account):nuculerman wrote...
Ecael wrote...
Another pointless contribution with an attitude to the thread! How original! Another account of Bucky/Din/troll? I've already proven everything you said wrong, so I'll just post this from nownuculerman wrote...
Excuse me. Since when is South Park humor meant to insult your opponent and agree with you a pointless contribution? I guess you'd rather me say something more scientific? To what end? You've already posted 15 times on the subject and seem to know more about human biology than I do. I'm a nuclear engineer. If you'd like me to contribute by proving why the shortest distance between two points is a straight line using variational calculus, or calculate the lifetime of a nuclear power plant, I'm your man. But as for genetics, sorry, all I have to contribute is good natured humor.
Well I'll also say this is just a game, and the scientific lore, no matter how seemingly unscientific it is, is always right. The writers wanted humanity to be the most genetically varied species in the Galaxy so they are. Arguing with them over the likelihood of such a phenomenon is pointless and juvenile. It's called science fiction for a reason. Of course I was doing you a kindness and not pointing out you're arguing and obsessing of something so trivial because I don't openly insult people for no reason, but I feel that you've provoked me for calling me a troll because I thought a thread was funny and I think South Park is funnier.
Nuculerman's humor dialogue wheel:
Modifié par Ecael, 19 avril 2010 - 01:44 .
#130
Posté 19 avril 2010 - 01:48
Ecael wrote...
South Park humor or not, people usually preface jokes and insults toward me with "I know you've given a lot to the forums, Ecael", so it's obvious who you are (or who you shouldn't be).nuculerman wrote...
Ecael wrote...
Another pointless contribution with an attitude to the thread! How original! Another account of Bucky/Din/troll? I've already proven everything you said wrong, so I'll just post this from nownuculerman wrote...
Excuse me. Since when is South Park humor meant to insult your opponent and agree with you a pointless contribution? I guess you'd rather me say something more scientific? To what end? You've already posted 15 times on the subject and seem to know more about human biology than I do. I'm a nuclear engineer. If you'd like me to contribute by proving why the shortest distance between two points is a straight line using variational calculus, or calculate the lifetime of a nuclear power plant, I'm your man. But as for genetics, sorry, all I have to contribute is good natured humor.
Well I'll also say this is just a game, and the scientific lore, no matter how seemingly unscientific it is, is always right. The writers wanted humanity to be the most genetically varied species in the Galaxy so they are. Arguing with them over the likelihood of such a phenomenon is pointless and juvenile. It's called science fiction for a reason. Of course I was doing you a kindness and not pointing out you're arguing and obsessing of something so trivial because I don't openly insult people for no reason, but I feel that you've provoked me for calling me a troll because I thought a thread was funny and I think South Park is funnier.
Hmm. Well I'll preface this insult with a warning. It is an insult and not blatant sarcasm. The two seem to confuse you, so as long as we're clear to begin with I think my meaning won't be totally lost on you this time around.
Grow up. At first I thought you were just trying to be helpful but now it's obvious you are one of those personalities that gets off on correcting others on the internet. Eventually you will realize that Bucky is the smartest kid in his sixth grade class and your arguments are completely lost on him. Next you'll realize that the majority of people on the internet have the maturity of intelligence of Bucky and you'll be forced into apathy, which is followed by humor heavily laced with sarcasm, such as my first post. I shouldn't need to pay homage to you before I make a joke. I have no idea what you contribute to these forums since I don't visit them frequently and I could really care less. But it's apparent all the compliments you've received have gone to your head and now you're not even any fun.
I'll leave you with this. Is this really who you want to be? http://xkcd.com/386/
#131
Posté 19 avril 2010 - 01:48
Bucky_McLachlan wrote...
Sure but both animals are indisputably inferior to the animal from which domestic dogs were originally breed. They are not evolved animals in any way, if anything they have devolved in several ways from the original species.PTPR wrote...
There is a significant difference between a border collie and a beagle.
Alright now since I can't reach through the internet and swat you upside the head myself I'll have to ask you to either do it yourself or have someone close by do it. Assuming you didn't do that I'll carry on anyway. I hear statements like this all the time and it pisses me off to no end because it usually comes from people who don't know what they're talking about.
Evolution has nothing to do with superiority, evolution is not some means towards an end goal. By your logic, flies are inferior to humans, therefore flies are not evolved organisms. Every organism is an evolved organism superiority doesn't enter into it.
#132
Posté 19 avril 2010 - 01:53
Finally, you reference something that's actually humorous every once in a while!nuculerman wrote...
But it's apparent all the compliments you've received have gone to your head and now you're not even any fun.
I'll leave you with this. Is this really who you want to be? http://xkcd.com/386/
For a second I thought calling my behavior juvenile (after attempting a South Park reference) was the only thing that came from you that was funny.
:innocent:
7382948128212060
Modifié par Ecael, 30 juin 2010 - 09:08 .
#133
Posté 19 avril 2010 - 01:55
Ecael wrote...
Nuculerman's humor dialogue wheel:
I wonder how you think South Park is anything like Carlos Mencia, Family Guy, or Dane Cook? I hate Dane Cook, Seth MacFarlan ran out of comedy after season three, and Carlos Mencia only ever had one joke.
South Park's greatest achievement is that it's writers don't take themselves seriously at all. Which is something you obviously don't understand, so I don't even know why I bother.
#134
Posté 19 avril 2010 - 01:59
Ecael wrote...
Finally, you reference something that's actually humorous every once in a while!nuculerman wrote...
But it's apparent all the compliments you've received have gone to your head and now you're not even any fun.
I'll leave you with this. Is this really who you want to be? http://xkcd.com/386/
For a second I thought calling my behavior juvenile (after attempting a South Park reference) was the only thing that came from you that was funny.
:innocent:
As opposed to humorous the majority of the time, which South Park is.
Once again I feel like random results from google searches can better explain my feelings:
http://images.paraor...s_cat-12947.jpg
#135
Posté 19 avril 2010 - 02:01
#136
Posté 19 avril 2010 - 02:02
#137
Posté 19 avril 2010 - 02:05
DPSSOC wrote...
Bucky_McLachlan wrote...
Sure but both animals are indisputably inferior to the animal from which domestic dogs were originally breed. They are not evolved animals in any way, if anything they have devolved in several ways from the original species.PTPR wrote...
There is a significant difference between a border collie and a beagle.
Alright now since I can't reach through the internet and swat you upside the head myself I'll have to ask you to either do it yourself or have someone close by do it. Assuming you didn't do that I'll carry on anyway. I hear statements like this all the time and it pisses me off to no end because it usually comes from people who don't know what they're talking about.
Evolution has nothing to do with superiority, evolution is not some means towards an end goal. By your logic, flies are inferior to humans, therefore flies are not evolved organisms. Every organism is an evolved organism superiority doesn't enter into it.
Yea? Evolution only takes in consideration the ability to reproduce, not to be the fastest, largest, strongest mother****er around.
Get over it, Beagles were selectively bred to be beagles, they did not really evolved there. The laws of evolution do not apply to selective breeding (same as how they no longer apply to humans)
#138
Posté 19 avril 2010 - 02:08
Good on ya, Monsanto.
#139
Posté 19 avril 2010 - 02:09
Monsanto can kiss my ass...Tlazolteotl wrote...
Or genetically modification, either.
Good on ya, Monsanto.
I hate Monsanto...
#140
Posté 19 avril 2010 - 02:10
Nostradamoose wrote...
DPSSOC wrote...
Bucky_McLachlan wrote...
Sure but both animals are indisputably inferior to the animal from which domestic dogs were originally breed. They are not evolved animals in any way, if anything they have devolved in several ways from the original species.PTPR wrote...
There is a significant difference between a border collie and a beagle.
Alright now since I can't reach through the internet and swat you upside the head myself I'll have to ask you to either do it yourself or have someone close by do it. Assuming you didn't do that I'll carry on anyway. I hear statements like this all the time and it pisses me off to no end because it usually comes from people who don't know what they're talking about.
Evolution has nothing to do with superiority, evolution is not some means towards an end goal. By your logic, flies are inferior to humans, therefore flies are not evolved organisms. Every organism is an evolved organism superiority doesn't enter into it.
Yea? Evolution only takes in consideration the ability to reproduce, not to be the fastest, largest, strongest mother****er around.
Get over it, Beagles were selectively bred to be beagles, they did not really evolved there. The laws of evolution do not apply to selective breeding (same as how they no longer apply to humans)
mmm no. That's pretty much exactly what evolution does through both instances of selection and predation.
Any rain forest pretty much invalidates your statement. Specifically adapted animals for specifically adpated environements, all without "artifical" intervention.
#141
Posté 19 avril 2010 - 02:11
Be still, nuculerman. You clearly don't understand Ecael's amazing sense of humor and parody. Why, it's almost as if you had separate accounts so you could compliment the largest troll on the forums with clever subtlety while bringing down the one person who can prove you wrong in every instant, which is clearly something Ecael could never do in return!nuculerman wrote...
Ecael wrote...
Nuculerman's humor dialogue wheel:
I wonder how you think South Park is anything like Carlos Mencia, Family Guy, or Dane Cook? I hate Dane Cook, Seth MacFarlan ran out of comedy after season three, and Carlos Mencia only ever had one joke.
South Park's greatest achievement is that it's writers don't take themselves seriously at all. Which is something you obviously don't understand, so I don't even know why I bother.
I'm a spinal neurosurgeon and aerospace engineer by day, and a caped superhero by night. If you want me to contribute by operating on a herniated disc using only a steak knife, a flashlight and tweezers, I'm your woman. Clearly, these qualifications make my posts more correct than yours is, but there's also the possibility that I'm just messing around. But as for genetics, all I have to contribute is humor that hasn't become entirely trite like Family Guy, Carlos Mencia OR South Park.I'm a nuclear engineer. If you'd like me to contribute by proving why the shortest distance between two points is a straight line using variational calculus, or calculate the lifetime of a nuclear power plant, I'm your man. But as for genetics, sorry, all I have to contribute is good natured humor.
I hope no one noticed that I haven't been posting on another specific account, otherwise they might think I'm actually someone else! I mean, it's not like that happened before when I saw Dinkamus stop posting and Bucky start posting in the same thread minutes after with the same bitter attitude!
Alas, my account was registered months ago, when I first considered perusing the forums, therefore I am a completely different person who can insult others at will and feel completely offended if they retaliate. I won't admit it though, and I'll just say everyone else is taking it way too seriously!
WHERE ARE MY LOLCAT PICS?
My plan is genius! Why did I ever say I was a caped superhero? I actually meant I was a dastardly super villain whose goals are somewhat unclear!
#142
Posté 19 avril 2010 - 02:12
#143
Posté 19 avril 2010 - 02:14
Why are people debating so much over this one small point? It's not even something you can really prove wrong since you don't have the genetic history of every species in Mass Effect.
#144
Posté 19 avril 2010 - 02:16
This post is epic. Who could possibly come up with such a response?ShepardWrex wrote...
Be still, nuculerman. You clearly don't understand Ecael's amazing sense of humor and parody. Why, it's almost as if you had separate accounts so you could compliment the largest troll on the forums with clever subtlety while bringing down the one person who can prove you wrong in every instant, which is clearly something Ecael could never do in return!nuculerman wrote...
Ecael wrote...
Nuculerman's humor dialogue wheel:
I wonder how you think South Park is anything like Carlos Mencia, Family Guy, or Dane Cook? I hate Dane Cook, Seth MacFarlan ran out of comedy after season three, and Carlos Mencia only ever had one joke.
South Park's greatest achievement is that it's writers don't take themselves seriously at all. Which is something you obviously don't understand, so I don't even know why I bother.I'm a spinal neurosurgeon and aerospace engineer by day, and a caped superhero by night. If you want me to contribute by operating on a herniated disc using only a steak knife, a flashlight and tweezers, I'm your woman. Clearly, these qualifications make my posts more correct than yours is, but there's also the possibility that I'm just messing around. But as for genetics, all I have to contribute is humor that hasn't become entirely trite like Family Guy, Carlos Mencia OR South Park.I'm a nuclear engineer. If you'd like me to contribute by proving why the shortest distance between two points is a straight line using variational calculus, or calculate the lifetime of a nuclear power plant, I'm your man. But as for genetics, sorry, all I have to contribute is good natured humor.
I hope no one noticed that I haven't been posting on another specific account, otherwise they might think I'm actually someone else! I mean, it's not like that happened before when I saw Dinkamus stop posting and Bucky start posting in the same thread minutes after with the same bitter attitude!
Alas, my account was registered months ago, when I first considered perusing the forums, therefore I am a completely different person who can insult others at will and feel completely offended if they retaliate. I won't admit it though, and I'll just say everyone else is taking it way too seriously!
WHERE ARE MY LOLCAT PICS?
My plan is genius! Why did I ever say I was a caped superhero? I actually meant I was a dastardly super villain whose goals are somewhat unclear!
Quoting for emphasis.
#145
Posté 19 avril 2010 - 02:19
#146
Posté 19 avril 2010 - 02:19
Xaijin wrote...
Nostradamoose wrote...
DPSSOC wrote...
Bucky_McLachlan wrote...
Sure but both animals are indisputably inferior to the animal from which domestic dogs were originally breed. They are not evolved animals in any way, if anything they have devolved in several ways from the original species.PTPR wrote...
There is a significant difference between a border collie and a beagle.
Alright now since I can't reach through the internet and swat you upside the head myself I'll have to ask you to either do it yourself or have someone close by do it. Assuming you didn't do that I'll carry on anyway. I hear statements like this all the time and it pisses me off to no end because it usually comes from people who don't know what they're talking about.
Evolution has nothing to do with superiority, evolution is not some means towards an end goal. By your logic, flies are inferior to humans, therefore flies are not evolved organisms. Every organism is an evolved organism superiority doesn't enter into it.
Yea? Evolution only takes in consideration the ability to reproduce, not to be the fastest, largest, strongest mother****er around.
Get over it, Beagles were selectively bred to be beagles, they did not really evolved there. The laws of evolution do not apply to selective breeding (same as how they no longer apply to humans)
mmm no. That's pretty much exactly what evolution does through both instances of selection and predation.
Any rain forest pretty much invalidates your statement. Specifically adapted animals for specifically adpated environements, all without "artifical" intervention.
No, evolution only applies to life without artificial intervention, i.e. without a human behind it selecting who shall reproduce and who shall be neutered.
Rainforests are not humans... And oh, just btw, most scholars do not consider outside selection as evolution. Common error, but they are not the same.
#147
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
Posté 19 avril 2010 - 02:24
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
That's an understatement.Internet Kraken wrote...
This forum doesn't have a very high moderator presence.
#148
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
Posté 19 avril 2010 - 02:26
Guest_JohnnyDollar_*
Well that explains it.
Modifié par JohnnyDollar, 19 avril 2010 - 02:26 .
#149
Posté 19 avril 2010 - 02:26
The sole fact the "but the priiize" thread has'nt been close is a heavy proof of this...JohnnyDollar wrote...
That's an understatement.Internet Kraken wrote...
This forum doesn't have a very high moderator presence.
#150
Posté 19 avril 2010 - 02:27





Retour en haut






