SmokeyNinjas wrote...
cruc1al wrote...
[...] Hence, AP for soldier is a waste of points. That's all I have to say
Well thats nice but its still nothing more then your opinion.
When it comes to the ammo on shep both Tungsten & Inferno will strip armor at about the same speed but when they get to health the Tungsten will keep doing full damage where as the Inferno damage will be spread over 3 seconds while it also CC the enemy & has the chance to CC enemys around the one your shooting.
You can argue that the CC is more valuable then the damage but at the end of the day its only more valuable if you need it. If you dont need it because a Solider with Revenant mows enemys down in seconds anyway then extra CC becomes unnecessary overkill.
As for the squad ammo with Inferno you squad will also strip armor faster therefore your squad will start CCing them by making them dance around fire thereby stopping them from shooting sooner then a squad with cyro ammo would freeze them.
You can argue that the better CC of cyro plus double damage to frozen enemies is more valuable then the faster CC of Inferno but just like above the better CC is only more valuable if you need it.
But if your killing enemies really fast which you can do by charging them with the Revenant then once again the overkill CC of cyro is unnecessary as the enemies wiil already be dead before you get the full benefit from it where as the Inferno CC's although not as good Cyro will happen faster so you can get more benefit from it.
So like i said before both are very effective solutions & as for which one is better comes down to personal preference & playstyle.
Just because in your opinion the Cyro setup is better does not mean that anyone who perfers the Tungsten setup is wrong or is wasting points.
Get the **** over yourself your opinion is not the law of the land.<_<
I'm not presenting my opinion as absolute truth, I'm presenting it as my opinion. If you can actually convince me that I should rethink my opinion, that'd be great. That's what arguments are for. I think your comment "get the f*uck over yourself" was a bit over the top. Based on your post, I could say the same to you but I won't - I appreciate that you don't think the same way. Of course I don't mind arguing, but you seem to, since you are uncomfortable admitting that you even have an opinion either way. Yet you're still arguing.
Now... you ought to agree that your post contains a crapload of opinions too.
Based on what is extra CC for Soldier unnecessary overkill? Plus, is that a bad thing? I mean, it does sound like you're admitting that extra CC means you'll be better at killing opponents, but that you'll be just fine without it, hence overkill. But it wasn't entirely clear to me - did you simply mean that on average, you'd be faster at killing without the extra CC than with it?
I think that since soldier is low on CC to start with, it's much more important to prioritise CC than weapon damage especially with a weapon like Revenant with which you'll benefit when you don't have to take cover from enemy fire as much since you're not reloading as often as with other weapons.
Then you present your opinion that incendiary ammo is better than cryo because of its faster CC. There are multiple reasons why it isn't. 1) incendiary as CC only works against humanoid organics not counting Krogan, whereas Cryo works on anything, even synthetics (hence it's better than squad disruptor) 2) the CC duration is less than half the CC duration squad cryo 3) you'll be using incendiary only on armored opponents anyway. 4), and this is an opinion: the Soldier will be fine on its own taking down the armor/shields of opponents: with Squad cryo active, you can take down enemy protection one by one with your own Inferno/heavy disruptor, leaving unarmored opponents for squadmates to freeze.
Then your remark that "both are very effective solutions and it comes down to personal preference and playstyle". Of course it depends on playstyle... No, actually it defines your playstyle. What I'm saying is that squad cryo playstyle > squad incendiary playstyle; it's not like both are just as good. One personal preference can be objectively worse than another. And you're arguing without taking any position.
Modifié par cruc1al, 20 avril 2010 - 12:56 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut






