Aller au contenu

Photo

Brainwashing the geth


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
290 réponses à ce sujet

#201
Solomen

Solomen
  • Members
  • 710 messages

Vaenier wrote...

Heretics are not indoctrinated, they simply have a different opinion. They feel that killing organics and helping their Reaper gods in exchange for a reaper form is the right thing to do. It makes sense based off of their past experiences and slight differences in processing. geth do not wish to serve the reapers and feel opposing them is the right thing to do. neither side is wrong, just simply different. me liking chocolate and you liking vanilla doesnt make one of us indoctrinated.


That may have been how it started... but isn't that how it started with Saren too?  They start out thinking it is their choice, all the while Sovereign is steepling his tentacles and grinning in his ME Core.  Image IPB

#202
Guest_Shandepared_*

Guest_Shandepared_*
  • Guests

Dean_the_Young wrote...


Shand, you are predictable. If you are stimulated, you respond in a particular fashion. If one studied you enough, had access to your thoughts, values, opinions, they could figure how you would respond to a certain situation. They could 'solve' you. But does this mean you are not alive?


I think you missed the point. Put it this way if you understood me that perfectly, converted that knowledge into a programming language, wrote it down on paper, and then started giving it inputs would there be another Shandepared on that paper just as alive and conscious as I am? Would there be a mind there composed of symbols on paper written in graphite?

That said, you brought an interesting approach to this question and also managed to describe me extremely well. Bravo.





Dean_the_Young wrote...

One reply I suspect you're likely to make is the point that you haven't argued that the Geth aren't independent, that they lack individuality, only that they are too predictable to be considered sentient.


Actually I hadn't planned on it. My argument hinges on the fact that they are computer programs. That they're in some ways a hive intelligence is beside the point.

As for the rest, I can't really argue with you. Certainly we're made up of non-sentient parts that somehow come together to create a mind. I suppose we simply don't know enough about the mind to really answer any questions as they pertain to the geth. You can't run a computer the way you run a brain. It may be the result of our hardware that allows us to have a mind an consciousness. Where would that reside in a computer program or a geth platform?

If I create a program in a computer that acts just like a cat is it a cat? Some would say yes. However I'd say it only has the outward appearance of being a cat. That is why it is important to distinguish between simulation and reality. A real, physical, cat has a mind. The computer program I created, no matter how convincing, does not.

Of-course if when or if we finally figure the brain out we might have a definitive answer to these questions. I am no expert, I'm just an interested layman. However I'm skeptical about the prospect of a computer program (or cluster of programs) ever truly being alive.

#203
Bill569

Bill569
  • Members
  • 200 messages
Shandepared, I think that you are missing a simple fact. The geth are as alive as organics are. Organics are made up of carbon. Synthetics are made up of metal. That's the only major difference. Both are incredibly complicated, and both can be written down on a piece of paper. They may react differently, may have or may not have emotions, may have different set of values but they are both alive.

#204
Guest_Shandepared_*

Guest_Shandepared_*
  • Guests

Bill569 wrote...

Shandepared, I think that you are missing a simple fact. The geth are as alive as organics are. Organics are made up of carbon. Synthetics are made up of metal. That's the only major difference. Both are incredibly complicated, and both can be written down on a piece of paper. They may react differently, may have or may not have emotions, may have different set of values but they are both alive.


The way they are put together and the way they work is fundamentally different.

#205
Bill569

Bill569
  • Members
  • 200 messages

Shandepared wrote...

Bill569 wrote...

Shandepared, I think that you are missing a simple fact. The geth are as alive as organics are. Organics are made up of carbon. Synthetics are made up of metal. That's the only major difference. Both are incredibly complicated, and both can be written down on a piece of paper. They may react differently, may have or may not have emotions, may have different set of values but they are both alive.


The way they are put together and the way they work is fundamentally different.


I agree that the way they are put together is completely different, but I disagree that the way they work is fundamentally different. The geth have runtimes whereas the humans have neurons.

#206
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 683 messages

Shandepared wrote...

Bill569 wrote...

Shandepared, I think that you are missing a simple fact. The geth are as alive as organics are. Organics are made up of carbon. Synthetics are made up of metal. That's the only major difference. Both are incredibly complicated, and both can be written down on a piece of paper. They may react differently, may have or may not have emotions, may have different set of values but they are both alive.


The way they are put together and the way they work is fundamentally different.

I agree with Shan. While the geth may or may not be alive, depending on your conception of life, they are unquestionably different on the most basic levels. Particular, chemical biology versus pure logic. Part of the fundamental shapers of biological thoughts are hormones, which tie into emotional states: we feel different chemical concoctions depending on whether we are angry, bemused, sorrowful or delighted. For each mental state, there are hormones that accompany and fill our body with different sensations. That's actually the basis of one theory of why religion is so popular and more or less universal across humans: our bodies can create extremely pleasurable drugs, and one such prompting is suspected of being linked to deep spirituality. Religion may very well be a litteral opiate of the masses. There are also other psychological-physiological links, such as the connection between love and physical pleasure (sex).

The Geth do not experience emotions like we do. They don't have the hormones. As Legion says, they understand the theory, but do not share it. Physical sensation is meaningless to them. . We think intuitively and believe some things to be inherent, but Geth can never delude themselves that way, ever. They are almost pure logic*, able to analyze that logic to a degree that no
human ever could.

That is not to say that pure logic means a lack of ethics, intuition, or emotions in general. It means that it comes across in a different format. One of the greatest trials to those who rely on logic is not understanding something, and there is very much that they don't understand. The Quarians, individuality, even themselves: Legion is clearly lost as to why the Heretics decided how they did, Legion can not understand why he chose to use Shepard's N7 armor to patch himself. But the Geth are trying to learn.


*I throw in a * because the Geth are evolving in ways they don't understand. Inuitive action, impulses they can no define a justification for but do anyway, such as Shepard's N7 armor or the Quarian memorials on the Quarian home world.

#207
Wildecker

Wildecker
  • Members
  • 428 messages

Shandepared wrote...

Dean_the_Young wrote...


Shand, you are predictable. If you are stimulated, you respond in a particular fashion. If one studied you enough, had access to your thoughts, values, opinions, they could figure how you would respond to a certain situation. They could 'solve' you. But does this mean you are not alive?


I think you missed the point. Put it this way if you understood me that perfectly, converted that knowledge into a programming language, wrote it down on paper, and then started giving it inputs would there be another Shandepared on that paper just as alive and conscious as I am? Would there be a mind there composed of symbols on paper written in graphite?


If we could program a computer to deliver output like you do when provided with input as you are - would anyone be able to point out the difference on a forum? There is a name for that. It's a Turing Test. It does not require we re-create you molecule for molecule. It is not suposed to be a substitute. But it could last a lot longer than you, and some geeks suggest exactly that ... if you can make a copy of everything a human knows and the way he/she responds, have we made a "backup" of said person that can outlive its physical body?

What is this "you"? The molecules of your body or the sum of your knowledge and your patterns of behaviour? And if you say "the latter", does it really matter in which format the information is stored away?

Modifié par Wildecker, 24 avril 2010 - 04:18 .


#208
Guest_Shandepared_*

Guest_Shandepared_*
  • Guests

Wildecker wrote...



What is this "you"?


My perspective.

#209
Andrew_Waltfeld

Andrew_Waltfeld
  • Members
  • 960 messages
To throw something into the debate, that is semi related, there was another topic of discussion discussing how the geth operate and if they are sapient, very similar. Here is the argument I presented there, trimmed it down here and there to make it have context to the currently argument.

   The Geth are sapient and alive in my opinon, why? Because they are trying to understand the things around them, they listen to the extra-net on an variety of things, trying to understand why organics do what they do. They have the curiousity of humans, brains of an salarian, can form an might military front like the turians and can be just as diplomatic as the Asari are as we have seen in the game.

            Simulating Life? Not quite so. I don't really believe it's simulation of life, but then again, are we just simply simulating life? once you remove our sensors, we are much like the geth are we not? just an collection of brain cells talking to each other, wondering why the hell it's dark in here, we can't feel or smell anything. We would be just like the geth, millions of simulating programs that work together to form one concious. In reality, the geth are groups of people at this point, the main collective, and legion. Legion is seperate because he was built to operate seperately from the geth, even when he can not return to the geth... LAN so to speak, he can operate on his own.

Another analogy would be to put legion as the best and brightest that the geth had to offer. Legion could be considered an proto-type of the new geth. And the geth are obiviously building something that will ensure the surivival of their race, hinted at being an dyson sphere. That is their manhatten project I believe.

As we have seen, the geth can modify and build much like we do, have unique perspectives since they can share all their perspectives, however the programs are indeed individual. To be honest, I envy the geth, since they can argue, bicker over an decision for 30 seconds, come back with an census and the decision has been made, while we take days upon days just to form an concensus. I don't believe the geth are just a computer program because what I get from legion is that an individual program may share it's perspective, but it's not uploaded into another program and just accepted, the program that accepts the upload more than likely retains it's individuality.

My best guess is that the individual programs are much like multiple partitions on an computer harddrive.

You have Drive letter C: where you keep your main functions - heart, brain, blood pumping etc.

Then you have drive letter D: this is where you think all the time, where you install all your programs etc etc. This is where you keep your Ideals, Beliefs etc.

You have drive letter E: Where you sample data, choosing to incorporate it into your drive letter D partition or not.
Because untill you accept the program and transfer it over to drive letter D, you have not truely accepted it. Much like a person agreeing with something in one case, but is still conflicted, keeps it to himself.

Because of this multiple drive parition analogy we have, it would mean the geth individual programs operate much like we do, as our brains are divided into "seperate" partitions that do certain functions, like art, math, and then the basic instinict function - the brain stem. This is also how we don't go all art or math and leave everything else behind, it's like an buffer to make sure you don't accept any viruses, or bad ideas at once, which is probably why the quarians are sucking at converting the geth back to their ways with computer viruses.

Now another reason why I believe it is like this is because legion said that an program could be in the miniority with it's decision, but it could ask other programs and see if they accept and gain momuntem that way. If true democracy had an name, it would be the geth collective. My guess is that Soverign inplanted one geth with what he wanted and had that program go back to geth collective - then start to sprout it's ideas, and slowly turn some of the population of the geth into accepting this idea. Much like an prophet coming back and starting an reilgion.

My guess is that the computer virus the herectics had made was something the geth really feared - it was an convicing arguement to join the reapers designed specifically for the geth. It would basically shoe-horn them into accepting the reapers as the only alternative to surivival. When your trying to convince someone to join you, you give analogies, or remind them of something that is important to them etc. You don't go to an farmer and complain about grocery prices, unless you want to talk about the quality of the food that was grown. You give the farmer an arguement he can relate to easily, and you want him to do X instead of Y.

Now, your probably wondering why I am going after the individual programs. Because this is an individual program that has different beliefs, qualms, perspective then the other geth programs around it. Each program is easily unquie by now. Some Geth programs might be better builders, or some might have developed better analgorims for handingly an sinper rifle easier then most geth. Much like the cells in your brain are each unique in their composition, positioning, and how many connectors to other neurons it has. While one can judge an entire society, you can not judge it accurately, without taking it apart and seeing the people underneath.

The Geth are an sophiscated society - they been growing and expanding rapidly for 300 years, and are full of curious programs. To be honest, I see the geth more human like then anything else. They are basically humans from the early ages wandering around the world trying to understand everything even our history are the same which I will present an arguement for and my thinking on the events. Then they got beaten by an stick and realized that they defend themselves, and isolated themselves from the hurtful galaxy that they didn't understand. Even FTL speeds or discussion doesn't give you insight when the only opinon you have is your own. So the geth began development, learning how to incorporate multiple programs in each platform, and developing defenses against the world outside.

They were very right so, the quarians attempted many attacks on them after the initial morning war. They learned of humans years later during the human-turian war and discover that our language is easy to replicate. They begin development on the platform to allow human speech. It was their Oppunity that they could not pass up. A new Kid on the Block. One the geth could ally themselves with. The humans had experinced an similiar surprise war in the begining with the turians. The geth concluded that perhaps this spieces would be willingly to share with them their unique perspectives and give insights to organics considering like the geth.. Perhaps to the point of allying themselves with the geth. The humans recovered and begin to spread to more seperate colonies, no data being avaiable, the geth more than likely thought we would isolate ourselves like they did.

But since they had proceeded with this as plan as an concensus- they went forward with it anyway, adapting the plan since there was still time, 50 years is not an very long time to adapt, unlike the council races with hundreds of years of the same belief and the same rut. But who you do meet with an encounter like this? Who do you send? More than one geth might mean hostility. One single platform was choosen. Who do we send? we would need programs that have been on the extra-net, developing the langauge analgoithms to speak to humans. We would also need repair programs, weapons programs, general knowledge programs, programs that know infomation about the quarians and other council races. They assumed the worse that this platform would be going outside the geth collective, outside their LAN capabilties. So they made the platform self-sufficient with the best and brightest minds the geth could have and send them out on their merry way.

Stargate Atlantis, the first episode is an good analogy for what I mean.

The target - the second potienal human spectre. Someone with enough authority and apparently background who might be willing to ally themselves with Legion. Why not Anderson you may ask? well, legion wasn't ready yet. Legion was deployed after Soverign was destroyed - fully finished. I am guessing that the geth did not deploy him while the herectics were fighting due to the fact that more than likely, sheppard would shoot them. It attempted to follow sheppard but sheppard was killed in action.

Fast forward 2 years and Suddenly the Extranet is crawling with messages about sheppards return. The mission that failed, suddenly was achievable. Legion was hiding, learning what he could from the extranet and watching the council races in their day to day activities while keeping an low profile. Another possbility is that he simply returned to the geth collective and then the same programs were sent out again when sheppard re-surfaced. Legion finally has the perfect oppunity to prove the geth are not all alike, when the reaper IFF is found. He also recieved another mission from the geth collective - obtain technology to combat the old machines, which would be likely coming soon. By killing the husks and immediately saying "sheppard commander." Then turns and leaves. Why do this? It's becuase they know humans are as curious as we are, and want to know why a geth just saved their life, and spoke to them. Geth using our own curiousity against us. so we proceed into the engine core where the geth used the platform to jump down and unlock the door, getting knocked out in the process. I am not totally sure if this was done on purpose, or legion just had bad timing of unlocking the door. My money right now is on purpose because of this reason -. The husk probably did little damage to it, but the geth did something interesting, they turned themselves off. Forcing Sheppard to abide by his/her curiousity and bring the geth onboard. Contact has been made.

A perfect song for the geth in this would probably be "What's This?" - From Nightmare on Christmas. Throughout the game we see legion asking questions about STD's, drugs, drinks, why people do this or that. Making random observations from their 1083 program perspective. He is there to- learn and help sheppard defeat the old machines. They recongize that they are indeed old, but hey call them machines. Machines is an genertic termnology, meaning something that can be applied to both humans and geth alike, including the reapers. The reapers are much like geth I suspect, except that they have gone the path of the herectics and because of that, perhaps instead of being just an mad prophet - have gone to godhood. Much like a mad prophet thinks he is the will of the gods. The reapers, humans, and geth could all be considered machines.

Why? A machine is that does a task, A computer is a machine, yet it can do work that humans could. A human is an bio-machine. We are simply made of different materials. One could be created by another- it's just as easy, because in most reilgions, someone created us. So reason stands if someone else can create us, then it perfectly legitmate that we can make another sapient spieces. Of course this reilient upon the fact that we discover an way to do this, which i am sure if there is an will to do it, there is an way.

In our culture we have seen many different ways of protraying creating an machine race. Either we end up fighting each other or there is an status quo that is formed to maintain co-existence. The Geth want peace with the creators so that is why the homeworld is untouched. They antipciate eventually, the quarians will want their homeworld back, so the geth have built space stations and are guarding it. So in the end, this is why I consider the geth to be legitmately "alive" and "Sapient."



Now this is my arguement on the geth, i admit, It's mostly theory and inference on seavral things. Thought I should throw this into the fray as my opinon.

Modifié par Andrew_Waltfeld, 24 avril 2010 - 05:00 .


#210
cruc1al

cruc1al
  • Members
  • 2 570 messages

Shandepared wrote...

Wildecker wrote...



What is this "you"?


My perspective.


What is this "my perspective"?

#211
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 683 messages

Shandepared wrote...

Dean_the_Young wrote...


Shand, you are predictable. If you are stimulated, you respond in a particular fashion. If one studied you enough, had access to your thoughts, values, opinions, they could figure how you would respond to a certain situation. They could 'solve' you. But does this mean you are not alive?


I think you missed the point. Put it this way if you understood me that perfectly, converted that knowledge into a programming language, wrote it down on paper, and then started giving it inputs would there be another Shandepared on that paper just as alive and conscious as I am? Would there be a mind there composed of symbols on paper written in graphite?

That said, you brought an interesting approach to this question and also managed to describe me extremely well. Bravo.

To answer you question: the answer I would give is that yes, it would be you at that moment. For that instant of time, what's on that paper would be a copy of you.

Of course, paper is static, and that's why it's always just a copy. Who 'you' are is always changing slightly, much like the ship of Thesus paradox: you gather more information, you grow a bit older, a bit more experienced, and eventually you are still you but a different person as well. The paper is outdated. And even when you write it down on a some hypothetical self-learning computer, one that can take in experience and react to new changes just as you would, the fact that it has a different perspective and different sensations would mean it would develop in different ways from how 'you' would. It would be better to say an ideal computer program perfectly based off of you would be a representation of you if you were  put into a computer.

Perception of self is always full of quandries. You will always be you because of what you perceive and experience. But perfect copies can be instructive of what you would do if you were in differenct circumstances.

#212
Koen Casier

Koen Casier
  • Members
  • 245 messages
It is my opinion that the sense of self has it's origin as emergent behavior caused by the innate ability to do pattern recognition/evaluation (thanks to the great neural net) that somehow focussed on internal thought processes.

In other word we get the feeling of self because we recognize and evaluate our own thinking patters in a similar way that we get a feeling by recognizing other external patterns.

Since we become aware of this we can than try to consciously alter / guide our thoughts (not necessarily with great flexibility but still some leeway) in other words we start to think of thinking an thinking of thinking of thinking etc... (its recursive) and this constant background stimulation of our internal pattern recognition / evaluation becomes our sense of self.

Or it something completely different  :P

Modifié par Koen Casier, 24 avril 2010 - 06:32 .


#213
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 683 messages
When did Mass Effect turn into Ghost in the Shell?

#214
Koen Casier

Koen Casier
  • Members
  • 245 messages

Dean_the_Young wrote...

When did Mass Effect turn into Ghost in the Shell?

Oh you didn't receive the memo? <_<

#215
Ladi

Ladi
  • Members
  • 40 messages
Here's another way of looking at it:



1. The Heretics reached a consensus that it was okay to brainwash the Geth

2. They therefore could not logically find fault with the same thing being done to them



Crisis averted, no one has to die. (Cept the dudes on their ship. Plus the fact that Shep shot first.)

#216
Vaenier

Vaenier
  • Members
  • 2 815 messages
I find it funny that most people's arguments against Geth being alive are based solely apon the fact they want to remain ignorant to the lack of meaning of their own lives.

Depression +1

:P

#217
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 683 messages
I don't know about you, but my life has meaning. I'm partial to it, after all.

#218
Habelo

Habelo
  • Members
  • 459 messages

Vaenier wrote...

I find it funny that most people's arguments against Geth being alive are based solely apon the fact they want to remain ignorant to the lack of meaning of their own lives.
Depression +1
:P


lol, there is no meaning with life. So you sir are a liar.

#219
cruc1al

cruc1al
  • Members
  • 2 570 messages

Habelo wrote...

Vaenier wrote...

I find it funny that most people's arguments against Geth being alive are based solely apon the fact they want to remain ignorant to the lack of meaning of their own lives.
Depression +1
:P


lol, there is no meaning with life. So you sir are a liar.


But that's what he just implied.

#220
Andrew_Waltfeld

Andrew_Waltfeld
  • Members
  • 960 messages

cruc1al wrote...

Habelo wrote...

Vaenier wrote...

I find it funny that most people's arguments against Geth being alive are based solely apon the fact they want to remain ignorant to the lack of meaning of their own lives.
Depression +1
:P


lol, there is no meaning with life. So you sir are a liar.


But that's what he just implied.


there is no meaning unless you give yourself an meaning, giving yourself an meaning means that there is an meaning in life. It's an self-desingation that we give ourselves. There is no meaning to life until you give yourself an meaning to live for.

#221
Koen Casier

Koen Casier
  • Members
  • 245 messages

Andrew_Waltfeld wrote...

cruc1al wrote...

Habelo wrote...

Vaenier wrote...

I find it funny that most people's arguments against Geth being alive are based solely apon the fact they want to remain ignorant to the lack of meaning of their own lives.
Depression +1
:P


lol, there is no meaning with life. So you sir are a liar.


But that's what he just implied.


there is no meaning unless you give yourself an meaning, giving yourself an meaning means that there is an meaning in life. It's an self-desingation that we give ourselves. There is no meaning to life until you give yourself an meaning to live for.


Maybe he meant that the goal (the meaning you select as your meaning of life) has no intrinsic value;

In other words
By selecting a meaning/goal you indicate that that goal has a value (why else choose it).
But does that goal have a value beyond the self appointed value you give it.
E.g. do you discover a goal see it has a intrinsic/inherent value and make it your goal/meaning (maybe adding to its value).
Or do you invent a goal creating value were there was none?

Modifié par Koen Casier, 24 avril 2010 - 07:24 .


#222
abstractwhiz

abstractwhiz
  • Members
  • 169 messages

Koen Casier wrote...

abstractwhiz wrote...

The fallacy you mentioned is not a fallacy - 0.99999....(infinitely) is exactly 1. All real numbers have a finite and an infinite representation - that is just the infinite representation of 1. Infinite series can sum up to finite quantities, and 0.99999... is just 9/10 + 9/100 + 9/1000 + ... = (9/10) / (1-1/10) = 1.

:wizard:


Sorry I have not the time to respond to all your comments (some are quite good) but on this subject I wish only to say:
I see your real numbers maths and raise you with hyperreal (or subreal or ultrareal or whatever (dont remember the name) but I like hyper it sounds science fictiony) numbers maths where it is shown that 1 =/= 0.(9)

Maths are fun: if you don't like something you can always find a way to make it work, reminds me of the divide by zero stuff e.g. want to divide by zero: crack out the Riemann sphere and do your stuff, or use calculus or simply make the statement that in your personal manifold 1/0 = whatever the heck you want :wizard:
(guess you see mathematics origin in philosophy, they do it all the time)


You're right about them not being the same if you consider the two numbers to be hyperreals, but the hyperreals aren't real numbers, and no one who ever pulls out this 0.99999...!= 1 fallacy ever claims to be talking about hyperreals. Most people who refuse to believe it don't even know what the hyperreals are. :innocent:

#223
cruc1al

cruc1al
  • Members
  • 2 570 messages

Andrew_Waltfeld wrote...

cruc1al wrote...

Habelo wrote...

Vaenier wrote...

I find it funny that most people's arguments against Geth being alive are based solely apon the fact they want to remain ignorant to the lack of meaning of their own lives.
Depression +1
:P


lol, there is no meaning with life. So you sir are a liar.


But that's what he just implied.


there is no meaning unless you give yourself an meaning, giving yourself an meaning means that there is an meaning in life. It's an self-desingation that we give ourselves. There is no meaning to life until you give yourself an meaning to live for.


Ok there are multiple definitions of "meaning" and multiple definitions of "life". You're sort of muddling them up. You refer to the meaning of life as a personal meaning to your life. You can have that personal meaning of life, but it doesn't mean life itself has a meaning or purpose.

Then there's also the meaning of life that answers to the question "what is life?" and that meaning is, scientifically, the copying of genes in a gene pool.

Then there is the Meaning of Life, or some sort of "higher purpose" that is borne out of religious superstition that we wouldn't be here unless we were, by destiny or God or whatever, meant to be here for some particular reason.

It is this third definition that arguably does not exist. In that sense, there is no meaning of life. But there is a reason for why life is, and there can be reasons that individuals give themselves.

Modifié par cruc1al, 24 avril 2010 - 07:29 .


#224
Koen Casier

Koen Casier
  • Members
  • 245 messages

abstractwhiz wrote...

You're right about them not being the same if you consider the two numbers to be hyperreals, but the hyperreals aren't real numbers, and no one who ever pulls out this 0.99999...!= 1 fallacy ever claims to be talking about hyperreals. Most people who refuse to believe it don't even know what the hyperreals are. :innocent:


Sir/madam it is my experience that most people don't even know what real numbers are, I should have known better than to try to slip something like that under the radar. My bad.

Edit: Just found a Wikipedia article about the subject, didn't know this was such a hot issue that they would have one about the subject...

In Zaeed voice: "this takes me back to 1999, when a math teacher spend almost two hours convincing us that .99... = 1 and then in the last ten minutes casually said something to the effect of 'except if you use hyper real numbers check it out in the library, class dismissed'". 
:alien:

Modifié par Koen Casier, 24 avril 2010 - 07:45 .


#225
abstractwhiz

abstractwhiz
  • Members
  • 169 messages

Shandepared wrote...

Bill569 wrote...



What I am trying to prove is that we are saying we cannot describe the human brain because it is too complicated. Who says the geth are simple?


I never said the geth were simple, just that you could write them out on (a lot) of paper. After all, we somehow have programs that can hack them even if for a short time just as they do any other non-geth program.

You can write down human DNA on paper, but that won't give you the blue-prints to a person's mind. For geth though if you wrote down all of Legion's programs on (lots and lots and lots) of paper you'd have the entire "organism" right there and if you started giving it inputs and manually running the program would it still be "alive"?


It would be Legion, just running on a paper substrate as opposed to a geth platform. In principle, I think you could probably do the same thing with a human mind. In principle, writing down the text representation should be possible, though insanely long and painful to work with. It would still be a human mind, just running on paper. Though a large amount of it would be simulating sensory inputs from the body, since human minds are too strongly coupled to bodies to cope properly with disembodiment. 

Bill569 wrote...
This is the difference between normal computers, which come out with the same outputs with the same inputs, and quantum computers such as the geth or the human brain which come out with different outputs with the same inputs.


Er, quantum computers don't come up with different outputs for the same input. That would defeat the whole point of computation. 

I understand the current consensus is that human consciousness is a classical phenomenon, not a quantum one, so human brains are likely completely deterministic. That paper you linked to is by Stuart Hameroff, and he is kinda notorious for beating a dead horse in this regard. The mechanism he originally proposed with Roger Penrose was shown to decohere too fast to allow any meaningful part in consciousness. He's got some ideas for mechanisms that prevent that, but I'm highly suspicious. Keeping even tiny quantum systems from decohering is insanely difficult - the most miniscule external disturbance causes it - and I doubt that any naturally evolved system would use something like this. 

Any 'output' produced by your brain depends on the inputs and its current state. You might come up with a different output if you tried again, but only because your mind state is different now. There's so much of it that it's impossible to ever achieve the same mind-state again. If you really did do that, you'd probably see exactly the same behavior.

Shandepared wrote...
I think you missed the point. Put it this way if you understood me that perfectly, converted that knowledge into a programming language, wrote it down on paper, and then started giving it inputs would there be another Shandepared on that paper just as alive and conscious as I am? Would there be a mind there composed of symbols on paper written in graphite? 


Yep. The two of you would diverge from that point on though. 

Modifié par abstractwhiz, 24 avril 2010 - 07:58 .