Romance Advancement
#1
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 04:14
Do you think the advancement of romances (and indeed NPC friendships in general) will be more flowing and natural?
#2
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 04:17
#3
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 04:19
#4
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 04:19
#5
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 04:22
#6
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 04:31
#7
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 04:32
#8
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 04:34
Yeah, this is what I'm hoping for.Darthnemesis2 wrote...
I seem to remember David saying that you could choose to turn down a party member's advance, but later choose to re-initiate the romance, so I think you'll be ok.
#9
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 04:42
I didn't play Jade Empire so I don't know about that but I didn't like the way that the Romances in Mass Effect worked. Like it always goes up on stage in the conversation when you get done with one of the main missions otherwise they have nothing to say. It's always in the same room, etc, etc, etc.
I hope they make it so you see things happening with the romance outside of a -camp- area. Even if it's like you know, a lover/companion screaming "No!" when the PC dies. Or maybe starting an argument with the PC if he's a little to flirty with an NPC, would just be more fun if we saw the romance come into everything a little more. I think some people may be annoyed by that who knows.
#10
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 05:00
#11
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 05:03
#12
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 05:03
Edit: Ahhhhhh! Editing is messed up! It keeps copying words in places where they shouldn't be.
Modifié par Eshaye, 20 octobre 2009 - 05:06 .
#13
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 05:08
Complex? If you have a bi PC you can probably get three companions at a time vying for your PC's affection.sidion77 wrote...
I hope for a love triangle. The more complex the better I say.
Add barmaid kisses and brothel visits on top of that... Maybe there's a "gigolo" achievement like in Fallout 2?
Modifié par Tamyn, 20 octobre 2009 - 05:10 .
#14
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 05:14
#15
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 05:23
That's not Leliana with shirtless Zevran if that's what you're thinking.Foxd1e wrote...
I have to agree with what some people are saying, that they seem much more developed and natural in this game. I have also noticed, particulary in Zevron's character vid, that it seems NPC/NPC relationships can flourish too? This would surely enrich the overall experience.
#16
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 05:29
hmm, really? I saw him saying that once you turned your companion flirt down, "he would happily be just your friend" (or something along these lines), if you could find the link, it would be niceDarthnemesis2 wrote...
I seem to remember David saying that you could choose to turn down a party member's advance, but later choose to re-initiate the romance, so I think you'll be ok.
EDIT: found one of his posts regarding this:
www.dragonagecentral.com/filtered/page1/
I will point out that there might be the occasional, unprompted flirtatious comment from a potential romantic partner. You have the opportunity to respond in an uninterested fashion when this occurs, of course, and if so then such flirtation will never occur again.
A romance only begins when you either respond to such flirtations with overt interest of your own or whether you make your interest known to them otherwise.
Another two:
www.dragonagecentral.com/single/1233810841
www.dragonagecentral.com/single/1233807960
I'll let those two for the ones who want to read it. Of course, It can have changed, and I'd be happy if it did, because for me, the more chances we have in romances, the better.
Modifié par Linarc, 20 octobre 2009 - 05:39 .
#17
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 05:30
That wasn't Leliana. That was the female PC.Foxd1e wrote...
I have to agree with what some people are saying, that they seem much more developed and natural in this game. I have also noticed, particulary in Zevron's character vid, that it seems NPC/NPC relationships can flourish too? This would surely enrich the overall experience.
#18
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 05:41
www.dragonagecentral.com/single/1233811620
These are the ones I was thinking of. The first one does say something about a "not right now" response.
Modifié par Darthnemesis2, 20 octobre 2009 - 05:41 .
#19
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 05:50
different points of view
thank you for the links
#20
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 05:58
I thought, though, that the second one I quoted had something else in it specifically saying that you could let them down nicely, but then later decide to pick it back up again.Linarc wrote...
ahh, I understood your point, put I interpreted AClockworkMelon comment being about being rude to a romance option and them try to romance them again, not making the companion wait to say what he/she wanted.
different points of view
thank you for the links
Oops, I linked to the wrong quote for the second one...
www.dragonagecentral.com/single/1233810841
Modifié par Darthnemesis2, 20 octobre 2009 - 06:03 .
#21
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 06:03
you mean something like this?Ha! Naturally. All I mean is that the dialogue options that actually indicate a lack of interest are pretty hard to misinterpret.
Love Interest: "I don't mind following you. The view's pretty good."
PC: "See anything in particular you like?"
That would be flirty, and urge them on. Maybe even start the romance.
Love Interest: "I don't mind following you. The view's pretty good."
PC: "So long as we're not ambushed while you stare at my ***."
That would be pretty neutral. Wouldn't stop the flirting but wouldn't start the romance, either.
Love Interest: "I don't mind following you. The view's pretty good."
PC: "Keep your eyes on the road, got it?"
That would be considered discouragement. No more flirting after that, depending on how serious I considered the line.
EDIT: yes it was this one. You are right, if we choose the neutral choice we still have a chance, just can't be rude with them. Good enough to me.
Modifié par Linarc, 20 octobre 2009 - 06:08 .
#22
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 06:07
Linarc wrote...
ah, there is something about it in the second link I posted, let me quote it:you mean somethin like this?Ha! Naturally. All I mean is that the dialogue options that actually indicate a lack of interest are pretty hard to misinterpret.
Love Interest: "I don't mind following you. The view's pretty good."
PC: "See anything in particular you like?"
That would be flirty, and urge them on. Maybe even start the romance.
Love Interest: "I don't mind following you. The view's pretty good."
PC: "So long as we're not ambushed while you stare at my ***."
That would be pretty neutral. Wouldn't stop the flirting but wouldn't start the romance, either.
Love Interest: "I don't mind following you. The view's pretty good."
PC: "Keep your eyes on the road, got it?"
That would be considered discouragement. No more flirting after that, depending on how serious I considered the line.
Yup, that's the one I meant to quote...
#23
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 06:27
#24
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 07:12
#25
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 07:14
No one knows for sure. Except Bioware and they wont spill any beans.Cypher0020 wrote...
anyone know whath the same sex romance is? I'm really thinking its Morrigan and Zevran myself





Retour en haut







