83 réponses à ce sujet

[Onyx Jaguar]

I dont give a flying **** what platform it is being developed for as long as it is good.

[snarky kitteh reborn]

that last shot looks like some zombie super mutant.

[Rubbish Hero]

Busomjack wrote... Don't complain about it though

Why wouldn't I complain about it?

[Funkcase]

Rubbish Hero wrote...

It's designed with the xbox360 as the lead platform, not expecting much.

So was ME...

[Borschtbeet]

The game looks incredible! I just hope Obsidian Entertainment is given enough time to complete it.

Rubbish Hero, I think what Busomjack was trying to say is that PC gamers aren't taken seriously by the industry since very few of them are actual consumers.
It's kind of like a thief trying to sue a home owner because he fell through the roof and broke his leg.

Whether or not this applies to you personally, I don't know.  However, I don't think you should hold it against developers for putting their emphasis on a more lucrative platform.  This is a business we're talking about, not a charity.

Modifié par Borschtbeet, 27 avril 2010 - 10:45 .

[Seagloom]

I'm impressed so far. The graphics are looking sharp. The environments look more Fallout-ey to me too. I was a lot less impressed by Fallout 3 when pics began surfacing. As far as New Vegas goes, what busomjack wrote early on is what Obsidian has been saying. Las Vegas wasn't as hard hit by the nuclear cataclysm as other areas. It's still relatively intact.

New Vegas Trailer

The above trailer from months back has a shot of Vegas' skyline. It's brightly lit and colorful for a city in Fallout's universe. I'm so looking forward to this game.

Modifié par Seagloom, 28 avril 2010 - 12:13 .

[Kaiser Shepard]

I'm not sure if you were referring to that trailer, but I'm pretty sure that's not in-engine.

[Seagloom]

Yeah, it's not in-engine. The point is Vegas isn't supposed to look like it was bombed into submission. Call it reckless optimism, but I'm assuming Obsidian plans to give us a bright nighttime Las Vegas in the actual game too.

[Panderfringe]

Rubbish Hero wrote...

Why wouldn't I complain about it?

Because you are irritating and wrong.

Anyway, Fallout Vegas. I hear there may be a desert!

[jsachun]

OnlyShallow89 wrote...



PC gaming isn't going anywhere.

Because of one main reason. Power hungry graphics card needed to play at higher res & larger screen than consoles to make PC gaming more enjoyable than Console Gaming.

[CodeMyster]

randumb vanguard wrote...

I also disliked those subway systems... and I probably won't miss three dog maybe dog meat though

Shoot me now dog meat sucked balls! always running off to attack an enemy you didn't even want to mess with dying all the time too. Three dog was the s**t.

[Rubbish Hero]

Panderfringe wrote.... Because you are irritating and wrong.

How can I be wrong about personal preference?

[Onyx Jaguar]

CodeMyster wrote...

randumb vanguard wrote...

I also disliked those subway systems... and I probably won't miss three dog maybe dog meat though

Shoot me now dog meat sucked balls! always running off to attack an enemy you didn't even want to mess with dying all the time too. Three dog was the s**t.

All NPC Party Member's sucked in Fallout 3.  Impervious to bullets but a slight hint of fire kills them?  Nice try Bethesda but the fail is epic.

Modifié par Onyx Jaguar, 28 avril 2010 - 10:44 .

[Erinlana]

Fallout 3 was good , there was massive ammount's of areas to explore & so on hopfully new vegas can give the same but with more improvement .

[Rubbish Hero]

jsachun wrote... Because of one main reason. Power hungry graphics card needed to play at higher res & larger screen than consoles to make PC gaming more enjoyable than Console Gaming.

Are you suggesting StarCraft, Dota and Counterstrike 1.6/Source e.t.c... are power hungry?
It would be pretty silly billy sitting with a 42 inch HD-TV when you basically sit, one foot away from the screen.

Unless you want to look at this..



As opposed to this...





Also, superior controls and games with actual depth, mods e.t.c...

Modifié par Rubbish Hero, 28 avril 2010 - 10:50 .

[Funkcase]

OnlyShallow89 wrote...



PC gaming isn't going anywhere.

Why is Bioshock on that list? lol. I was pretty sure that was a consol game imported to the pc. I doubt pc gaming will die anytime soon, but when a console gets graphics on a par with the best pc's. mods, and may aswell be a pc just with a controler then pc gaming will die. But i dont think that's too far off.

[Onyx Jaguar]

Rubbish Hero wrote...

jsachun wrote... Because of one main reason. Power hungry graphics card needed to play at higher res & larger screen than consoles to make PC gaming more enjoyable than Console Gaming.

Are you suggesting StarCraft, Dota and Counterstrike 1.6/Source e.t.c... are power hungry?
It would be pretty silly billy sitting with a 42 inch HD-TV when you basically sit, one foot away from the screen.

Unless you want to look at this..


Also, superior controls and games with actual depth, mods e.t.c...

Yes I would play Counter Strike Source (or 1.6?  Really?) on a TV screen, don't care if they are not "Power Intensive".  Controls are subjective, rofl @ Depth, Mods sure PC has that over Consoles.  Etc?

Plus I am far closer to a monitor than a TV screen. 

[Seagloom]

Funkcase wrote...

Why is Bioshock on that list? lol.

I was wondering about Duke Nukem Forever myself. Whoever composed that pic should realize the ultimate vapourware doesn't count.