177 réponses à ce sujet

[CherryColaLola]

I iz seriousness in a bottle.

[Cascadus]

To prevent insanity I will presume that means not serious at all.

[itbewillyum]

Silly Geth...Didn't you see the sign over there that says Dont feed the Trolls!

[CherryColaLola]

LOL Come on that was funny. Here's the audio, dude can kinda sing too.







Sony you went wrong with your PS 3,

I'll just keep playing my 360,

hope this song has helped you understand,

Now you know how you killed your brand,



I do believe that if Sony wishes to get propriety on Biowares games, they need to pay for it. Just like every other console manufacturer. If anyones to be blamesd here, it's sony. For not offering compelling titles or making the right alliances with the game developers.



Sony's fault, cry them a river.

[ImperialOperative]

It should never go over to the PS3 because it would have to be dumbed down to make it fit onto the PS3.

[Cascadus]

CherryColaLola wrote...

I do believe that if Sony wishes to get propriety on Biowares games, they need to pay for it. Just like every other console manufacturer. If anyones to be blamesd here, it's sony. For not offering compelling titles or making the right alliances with the game developers.

Sony's fault, cry them a river.

Titles like... Uncharted (1 and 2), Valkyria Chronicles, Demon's Souls, Killzone 2, LittleBigPlanet, Rachet and Clank, Resistance, Heavy Rain, InFAMOUS or God of War III? Didn't realize those weren't compelling. And I didn't know securing exclusivity with companies like Naughty Dog was never a good decision.
And that's a terrifying double standard. Is it Microsoft's fault because they never made such alliances with Quantic Dream, Naughty Dog or Insomniac?
And Sony does pay for console exclusivity. A lot. And Microsoft bribing companies to release on their platform (mostly DLC, most blatant being the GTAIV packs and the MW2 Stimulus Pack (which is a ripoff anyways)) first isn't as bad? No one's to blame, here. Mass Effect was licensed by Microsoft for exclusivity rights and that's the end of story. They can wait till that agreement ends before they can port to the PS3. Regardless, why does the concept of ME being ported to the PS3 offend you so much? Because it's 'punishing' the filthy peons who dared purchase a PS3? Because you want to feel special? Give me a break and get off the high horse. No console is superior to another, if you like the 360, fine by you. Be comfortable with the fact you got the better console, but don't shove it in people's faces.

[Dethateer]

Cool, a race wa- err, a console war.

*munches popcorn*

[itbewillyum]

*Steals Popcorn and hides in the corner*



P.s Halo is over-rated and sucks but in not a Sony Fan Boy Pc games are the best....The End

[ImperialOperative]

Game exclusives fosters competition.

[Elvis_Mazur]

Because it would hurt them. Simple isn't ?

[Mycrus Ironfist]

only if they port metal gear solid into the PC... ****** for tat....

[Dethateer]

itbewillyum wrote...

*Steals Popcorn and hides in the corner*

P.s Halo is over-rated and sucks but in not a Sony Fan Boy Pc games are the best....The End

Give that back!
And shush, I want to hear.

[Mycrus Ironfist]

btw... ain't chess a sport? i move more when i play wii yah know...

[Cascadus]

I don't care much for console wars, to be honest. If the guy wants to continue this spat, than he can, but all of you looking for a fight can move along, because I'm officially bored of this conflict.

[ArmedChimp]

itbewillyum wrote...

I mean i can understand brand loyalties but seriously when games are successful like this i think the more people they can reach the better.More money=more expansions,download content,and better games from the companies.Why is there so much hatred whenever a playstation 3 owner asks for Mass Effect.I have ps3 and pc so its not a big deal really.I think it would be great though to have some game from the Mass Effect world appear on PS3 whether it be ME2 or ME3 even or another game all together(maybe an ME FPS)

I guess people will hate this idea if for no other reason due to brand/console loyalty but who knows....

You'll get the same responses when an xbox owner asks for Demon's Souls to come to xbox, or infamous.

[CherryColaLola]

Cascadus wrote...

CherryColaLola wrote...

I do believe that if Sony wishes to get propriety on Biowares games, they need to pay for it. Just like every other console manufacturer. If anyones to be blamesd here, it's sony. For not offering compelling titles or making the right alliances with the game developers.

Sony's fault, cry them a river.

Titles like... Uncharted (1 and 2), Valkyria Chronicles, Demon's Souls, Killzone 2, LittleBigPlanet, Rachet and Clank, Resistance, Heavy Rain, InFAMOUS or God of War III? Didn't realize those weren't compelling. And I didn't know securing exclusivity with companies like Naughty Dog was never a good decision.
And that's a terrifying double standard. Is it Microsoft's fault because they never made such alliances with Quantic Dream, Naughty Dog or Insomniac?
And Sony does pay for console exclusivity. A lot. And Microsoft bribing companies to release on their platform (mostly DLC, most blatant being the GTAIV packs and the MW2 Stimulus Pack (which is a ripoff anyways)) first isn't as bad? No one's to blame, here. Mass Effect was licensed by Microsoft for exclusivity rights and that's the end of story. They can wait till that agreement ends before they can port to the PS3. Regardless, why does the concept of ME being ported to the PS3 offend you so much? Because it's 'punishing' the filthy peons who dared purchase a PS3? Because you want to feel special? Give me a break and get off the high horse. No console is superior to another, if you like the 360, fine by you. Be comfortable with the fact you got the better console, but don't shove it in people's faces.

Well I am superior to any console gamer as I dont have any consoles. They are all pretty dumb. 

If I had to buy one, I'd get a Wii, had a blast on my brothers.

Just to clarify, I'm pretty much aproaching this subject very tongue in cheek, I really don't care if the crappy PS 3 gets to run Mass Effect.  Probably wont happen, Sony has it's head buried in the sand.

[JamieCOTC]

Just give me the 6 DVD disc set of ME3 and I'll be happy.

[Dethateer]

JamieCOTC wrote...

Just give me the 6 DVD disc set of ME3 and I'll be happy.

Seconded.

[Cascadus]

Thirded.

[AntiChri5]

Fourthered.

[tykfa1990]

I am not an owner of X-box 360 neither PS3, but my own observations ( also with some good reasons listed by you all earlier ) lead me to a conclusion. As someone said, remaking the whole game for PS3 would cost much time and would be expensive for the game developers. The basic laws of market give signs it would surely have influence on the next part of the ( let's call it properly ) Mass Effect saga. I actually am not just an excited kid, who will get a game only because of it's fame or just to have full set of all relases. The fact of developers introducing incomplete or detail lacking games annoy me greatly. I can give you some examples ( whatever developer made them ) GTA IV - biggest mistake in game coding, full of lacks, glitches, bugs. Have been relased much earlier than it should. And we got a game that were running awfull even on first class gaming hardware ( problems on all platforms ). Next one: Fallout 3 - 90% of players having problems with this one, and still waiting for fixes - that never came, I am having one copy myself.



I am sure you know many examples. Also there is something you'll call a war between XBOX and PS3. SONY did proven that some titles will never see any other platform, and let them be. But If such a strong company on the market needs more interesting titles, they should have done anything to develop the series from the very start. BioWare isn't a newborn company at all, they had much time to observe and to try to put some work to make ME a all-platform game. Equal on the level of gameplay, graphics, story, DLC and other stuff.

[Ecael]

Dethateer wrote...

JamieCOTC wrote...

Just give me the 6 DVD disc set of ME3 and I'll be happy.

Seconded.

Modifié par Ecael, 27 avril 2010 - 03:24 .

[Zenyattaa]

Because in all fairness Sony decided it would try to dictate what we as gamers would pay for a console. Their marketing strategy was to rattle off a ton of good features and arrogantly proclaim we would swallow the 500(Refresh my memory, if I'm wrong) dollar price tag. Because goddammit, they were Sony.



Surprise, surprise it blew up in their face. They shouldn't be rewarded for their marketing stupidity.

That's just my personal opinion though.



A more logical reason is, it would take away resources from DLC/development of dragon age:2, ME:3 and whatever other gaming goodness Bioware has in store for us.

[Brako Shepard]

Yeah some people are just idiots about the whole disc swapping thing. I cannot belive they get in such an uproar because they have to get of there arses to swap a disc twice.



These are the same bastards though who were over joyed about the update on the 360, when you could press 'X' to open the disc tray. Unba-frikkin-livable!



More discs means more content, I wish those twangers could see that.

[Jetpackshark]

I would want it on the PS3 so I wouldn't have to jungle with 10 discs just to play, and experience immense graphical difficulties.