233 réponses à ce sujet

[RyuGuitarFreak]

Looting, elevators, uncharted worlds back. That **** would scare me, especially the looting.
More seriously:
Squad mates returning only as cameo. Big choices not having relevance to your ending.
It's the final chapter of the saga! Make the choices worth to your ending!

Other BS people would post I think I wouldn't mind a lot.

Modifié par RyuGuitarFreak, 04 mai 2010 - 09:45 .

[LOLandStuff]

I don't want looting. I don't intend on spend more than half the game running around to stores in order to empty my inventory because I am a loot addict. I don't want either to drag all the junk after me because who knows, I might use it latter, better keep it.

Multiplayer...just no! there are so many FPS, people don't even play them and just get stuck with one or two.

Less RPG more FPS, WTF? Again, there are many shooters. If I want to kill stuff, I go play UT, Quake or CoD. If I want to take my frustration on something, I beat and run over people in GTA.

More LI. Seriously, aren't 9 enough?

new squad members. What for? What I want is more dialog and party banter not new characters for the final game. I didn't save the ones from ME2 just to see them go on about their business for no apparent reason and just to introduce a new bunch.

Marriage and babies. That is so wrong in so many levels.

Visiting Earth.

Saren resurrected...there are just too many absurd things to list.

[Lunatic LK47]

Skilled Seeker wrote...

Lunatic LK47 wrote...

Skilled Seeker wrote...
I don't want co op for the sake of co op only, I want to experience co op in ME.

Well, the way you wrote your earlier posts suggested the former. Look at where Resident Evil 5 ended up: Sure, high ratings, but the game was only passable solo on *NORMAL,* while the other difficulties had to make co-op *MANDATORY* just to win the game, not to mention the gameplay quality suffered for it, dragging chapters be damned.

lol Res5 can easily be completed on the hardest difficulty solo. You suck mate. And how did gameplay quality suffer? Its better than Res4.

Oh, wow, blame player skill for having a craptastic partner A.I.  Find something original, ***hole. Last time I checked, pretty much the entire fanbase got pissed off with the direction RE5 went through.

Modifié par Lunatic LK47, 05 mai 2010 - 12:01 .

[david46]

I don't want the characters I intentionally kill off on the suicide mission, lazarused. Just in case Bioware falls prey to the Talimancers I have a save ready to eliminate that storyline.



I do not want the shooterlike mission endings to continue to disrupt the flow of the game. Flying right back to a place you were, for another mission, is just stupid. At the very least add a cut scene to explain Shepard's forgetfulness.

Shepard: Head for the mass effect relay Joker

Joker: Aren't you forgetting something Commander?

Shepard: Hunh?

Joker: You got Mordin, but what about Archangel?

Shepard: Oh space hamster crap, back to Omega then!

Joker: (As Shepard leaves) Dork.

[ObserverStatus]

Tali birthing Shepard's bastard child.

[Chuvvy]

Icinix wrote...

<_< More shooter based, less RPG and have co-op.

If ME3 came out with these, that would probably greatly upset me.

No words would express how disgusted I would be.

No actions could mimic how frustrated and angry I was.

That would quite literally kill any desire I have to play games, create games, or anything interactive.





At least until Dragon Age 2.
 

This you just summed up everything. You did leave out competitive multiplayer. If bioware put that I'd seriously consider stabbing myself, just to get some of the rage out.

Modifié par Slidell505, 05 mai 2010 - 06:46 .

[Skilled Seeker]

Lunatic LK47 wrote...

Skilled Seeker wrote...

Lunatic LK47 wrote...

Skilled Seeker wrote...
I don't want co op for the sake of co op only, I want to experience co op in ME.

Well, the way you wrote your earlier posts suggested the former. Look at where Resident Evil 5 ended up: Sure, high ratings, but the game was only passable solo on *NORMAL,* while the other difficulties had to make co-op *MANDATORY* just to win the game, not to mention the gameplay quality suffered for it, dragging chapters be damned.

lol Res5 can easily be completed on the hardest difficulty solo. You suck mate. And how did gameplay quality suffer? Its better than Res4.

Oh, wow, blame player skill for having a craptastic partner A.I.  Find something original, ***hole. Last time I checked, pretty much the entire fanbase got pissed off with the direction RE5 went through.

The people that were pissed were those that expected it to go back to the old school gameplay. Some were also upset that there were 2 characters instead of 1.

Mass Effect already has you with a squad and 'craptastic' AI as you put it. Therefore OPTIONAL co op could only benefit the game.

Modifié par Skilled Seeker, 05 mai 2010 - 02:31 .

[Onyx Jaguar]

I'd just like to add that Mass Effect is not an FPS.



and that I hate fanboys



That is all.

[Lord Nicholai]

LOLandStuff wrote...

I don't want looting. I don't intend on spend more than half the game running around to stores in order to empty my inventory because I am a loot addict. I don't want either to drag all the junk after me because who knows, I might use it latter, better keep it.
Multiplayer...just no! there are so many FPS, people don't even play them and just get stuck with one or two.
Less RPG more FPS, WTF? Again, there are many shooters. If I want to kill stuff, I go play UT, Quake or CoD. If I want to take my frustration on something, I beat and run over people in GTA.
More LI. Seriously, aren't 9 enough?
new squad members. What for? What I want is more dialog and party banter not new characters for the final game. I didn't save the ones from ME2 just to see them go on about their business for no apparent reason and just to introduce a new bunch.
Marriage and babies. That is so wrong in so many levels.
Visiting Earth.
Saren resurrected...there are just too many absurd things to list.

I agree with all of that, apart from the 'Visiting Earth' part. I wouldn't mind it

[Masticetobbacco]

LOLandStuff wrote...

I don't want looting. I don't intend on spend more than half the game running around to stores in order to empty my inventory because I am a loot addict. I don't want either to drag all the junk after me because who knows, I might use it latter, better keep it.
Multiplayer...just no! there are so many FPS, people don't even play them and just get stuck with one or two.
Less RPG more FPS, WTF? Again, there are many shooters. If I want to kill stuff, I go play UT, Quake or CoD. If I want to take my frustration on something, I beat and run over people in GTA.
More LI. Seriously, aren't 9 enough?
new squad members. What for? What I want is more dialog and party banter not new characters for the final game. I didn't save the ones from ME2 just to see them go on about their business for no apparent reason and just to introduce a new bunch.
Marriage and babies. That is so wrong in so many levels.
Visiting Earth.
Saren resurrected...there are just too many absurd things to list.

fail, Mass effect is a TPS

[Onyx Jaguar]

Masticetobbacco wrote...

LOLandStuff wrote...

I don't want looting. I don't intend on spend more than half the game running around to stores in order to empty my inventory because I am a loot addict. I don't want either to drag all the junk after me because who knows, I might use it latter, better keep it.
Multiplayer...just no! there are so many FPS, people don't even play them and just get stuck with one or two.
Less RPG more FPS, WTF? Again, there are many shooters. If I want to kill stuff, I go play UT, Quake or CoD. If I want to take my frustration on something, I beat and run over people in GTA.
More LI. Seriously, aren't 9 enough?
new squad members. What for? What I want is more dialog and party banter not new characters for the final game. I didn't save the ones from ME2 just to see them go on about their business for no apparent reason and just to introduce a new bunch.
Marriage and babies. That is so wrong in so many levels.
Visiting Earth.
Saren resurrected...there are just too many absurd things to list.

fail, Mass effect is a TPS

This

[smecky-kitteh]

LOLandStuff wrote...

I don't want looting. I don't intend on spend more than half the game running around to stores in order to empty my inventory because I am a loot addict. I don't want either to drag all the junk after me because who knows, I might use it latter, better keep it.
Multiplayer...just no! there are so many FPS, people don't even play them and just get stuck with one or two.
Less RPG more FPS, WTF? Again, there are many shooters. If I want to kill stuff, I go play UT, Quake or CoD. If I want to take my frustration on something, I beat and run over people in GTA.
More LI. Seriously, aren't 9 enough?
new squad members. What for? What I want is more dialog and party banter not new characters for the final game. I didn't save the ones from ME2 just to see them go on about their business for no apparent reason and just to introduce a new bunch.
Marriage and babies. That is so wrong in so many levels.
Visiting Earth.
Saren resurrected...there are just too many absurd things to list.

why is visiting earth "absurd"?

[Lunatic LK47]

Skilled Seeker wrote...

The people that were pissed were those that expected it to go back to the old school gameplay. Some were also upset that there were 2 characters instead of 1.

Mass Effect already has you with a squad and 'craptastic' AI as you put it. Therefore OPTIONAL co op could only benefit the game.

Pff, and you made it sound mandatory just because you have buddies to play with. Newsflash, not every single gamer has the same preferences or same level of accessibility you do because, I don't know, we have something called A LIFE. Last time I recalled, Resident Evil was mostly a single-player series and I felt that the co-op felt shoe-horned in, improvements over Outbreak be damned. For the "two characters" mechanics, I'd say the A.I. is slightly above Resident Evil 0, but that's not saying much since they do more harm than good on the higher difficulties.

Modifié par Lunatic LK47, 05 mai 2010 - 04:36 .

[saracen16]

So I don't want to see...



New squadmates: for the last chapter in the trilogy, I think more emphasis must be put into making the campaign more story-driven. The Mass Effect universe is pretty much more or less open to us now: through ME2, we have discovered the politics of the Quarians, the Krogan, the Citadel, Omega, the Asari, and the Geth, among others. So, please, let us make do with what we have.



Multiplayer: if BioWare wants to make a multiplayer Mass Effect game, I think it's best that it be a separate spin-off for whoever wants to play it.



Space battles: if we have to control a Normandy against Reapers... better make it decision-based like in the end of ME2.



Co-op: there's only ONE Shepard: MINE!!1! (and yours, but you get the idea)

[The Governator]

Icinix wrote...

<_< More shooter based, less RPG and have co-op.

If ME3 came out with these, that would probably greatly upset me.

No words would express how disgusted I would be.

No actions could mimic how frustrated and angry I was.

That would quite literally kill any desire I have to play games, create games, or anything interactive.





At least until Dragon Age 2.
 

It would kill the game, absolutely KILL the game for me if it were more 'shooter' based.  I simply would not buy it and it would seriously damage my respect Bioware after that. 

Also, I do not want to deal with the Shadowbroker in ME3.  I would rather that be done (or not at all) in DLC that I can avoid buying/playing.

[Pacifien]

For me, Mass Effect isn't RPG enough. Not the stupid inventory or armor customization aspects, but the idea that your decisions matter. A person who saved the Collector Base should have a significantly different playing experience in ME3 than one who chose to destroy it.

Co-op or multiplayer of any kind is a slippery slope, particularly for one that has its roots in RPG. You can design the game around being a fantastic co-op, or you can design it around being a fantastic single-player. Odds are slim you'd manage both. For a game that started single-player and focuses on the story of one human, it would be odd to suddenly change that for the third installment. The only reason I can see for doing the switch is if Bioware felt pressure to add an element to the game that has been added to other successful games. I don't think I've ever seen that done well.

Now, co-op or multiplayer game set in the Mass Effect universe is perfectly acceptable. Could even set it around the events of the trilogy of games set around Commander Shepard. Just not the actual trilogy.

[Lord Nicholai]

The Governator wrote...



Also, I do not want to deal with the Shadowbroker in ME3.  I would rather that be done (or not at all) in DLC that I can avoid buying/playing.

So you want to have one of the most important characters in ME pushed aside to DLC that a lot of people wont even play? I know nothing on ME3 is known for certain, but its been pretty heavily hinted that the Shadowbroker is going to be a main player in the final game

[Pacifien]

Lord Nicholai wrote...
So you want to have one of the most important characters in ME pushed aside to DLC that a lot of people wont even play? I know nothing on ME3 is known for certain, but its been pretty heavily hinted that the Shadowbroker is going to be a main player in the final game

I was pretty keen on learning more about the Shadow Broker after the tidbits we'd gotten in ME1, but the rumors about him in a DLC have me not excited. Not excited at all. With every DLC they release with more variations of visors and armor, that's just one more DLC that has postponed the inevitable fail that will occur with the Shadow Broker DLC.

Unless the rumor isn't true, which is fine by me.

[LOLandStuff]

Masticetobbacco wrote...

fail, Mass effect is a TPS

It's a role playing game even if I shoot people. Just because it has guns it doesn't make it a TPS.
By your logic, if Shepard and the rest had swords or spells, it would be RPG, because there are no guns.
UT can be turned in TPS.

[Lucky Thirteen]

I'd hate it if they went back to all the stuff in ME1 that they took out.



I'd hate it if they redid everything again.



I'd hate it if for some stupid reason, I'm forced to work with Cerberus again.



I'd hate it if any characters I saved in ME2 die before or just have a small cameo in ME3.



I'd really hate it if they decided to do a MMO instead.



I demand a ladies bar with male strippers, but I know BioWare is going to disappoint me again on that one because they are now making male Shepard straight and female Shepard bisexual.



PECS OR GTFO!

[Masticetobbacco]

LOLandStuff wrote...

Masticetobbacco wrote...

fail, Mass effect is a TPS

It's a role playing game even if I shoot people. Just because it has guns it doesn't make it a TPS.
By your logic, if Shepard and the rest had swords or spells, it would be RPG, because there are no guns.
UT can be turned in TPS.

bah ME2 isnt even an RPG anymore, it's just a shooter where you can make desicions.

and I called fail on your comment because you called mass effect an FPS

[LOLandStuff]

Masticetobbacco wrote...

LOLandStuff wrote...

Masticetobbacco wrote...

fail, Mass effect is a TPS

It's a role playing game even if I shoot people. Just because it has guns it doesn't make it a TPS.
By your logic, if Shepard and the rest had swords or spells, it would be RPG, because there are no guns.
UT can be turned in TPS.

bah ME2 isnt even an RPG anymore, it's just a shooter where you can make desicions.

and I called fail on your comment because you called mass effect an FPS

XD I didn't say ME was a FPS, it's just what some keep on whining about on the internet, the lack of FPS and too much talk.

Modifié par LOLandStuff, 07 mai 2010 - 08:48 .

[Cody]

- Co-Op Campaign(multiplayer online may not be to bad as long as it doesn't effect the budget and the story in anyway, but thing is it might do just that, thats why I'm against it, BUT i have no problem with having the abilitiy to have a friend use another control to control a party member, thats alright, would be more like Gears of war then).

- New squad members(the ones from ME2 and 1 are enough)

- Changing the combat back to ME1 style(it's fine if they want to change it a LITTLE, or maybe make the biotic powers more balanced, as long as they don't completly revert back to the old system)

- Adding more RPG elements while taking away the "shooter" elements from the game, or vice - versa(If anything they should add more RPG AND Shooter elements to the game, not just one or the other)

- Brining back the old weapon and armor cusomization(it's fine the way it is, maybe add the customization  options that we had for the armor in ME2 onto the weapons to make them more unique, yeah that's a good idea, but not the whole upgrade system again)

Modifié par CodyMelch, 10 mai 2010 - 01:32 .

[KalosCast]

All of those suggestions made in the 'Virmire again' thread. If I lose another squaddie to contrived binary plot devices, I'm going to burn down Canada.

[superimposed]

Masticetobbacco wrote...

LOLandStuff wrote...

Masticetobbacco wrote...

fail, Mass effect is a TPS

It's a role playing game even if I shoot people. Just because it has guns it doesn't make it a TPS.
By your logic, if Shepard and the rest had swords or spells, it would be RPG, because there are no guns.
UT can be turned in TPS.

bah ME2 isnt even an RPG anymore, it's just a shooter where you can make desicions.

and I called fail on your comment because you called mass effect an FPS

You evidentally don't understand what an RPG is, then.