I012345 wrote...
But then doesn't that become an issue of trust? It seems like the theory a lot of people are presenting is that if we buy headset gear and amour the company will in turn decide not to release full quality expansion packs. But to some degree that 's an issue of the integrity of the company right? So if you feel like Bioware has turned a leaf and doesn't give a damn about it's consumers than yeah you would expect them to flood the market with a couple of headsets once a month, rake in the cash, and not release any real quality DLC regarding this product. I don't believe that's going to be the case. They've promised to release large quality DLC for this game and I still believe they're going to deliver.
Unless I'm wholly mistaken, THIS is the special DLC they were saying was coming soon last week. So I trusted them on that issue, got excited, and found out that all it was was a hate, laser glasses, and armor I might already have. Even putting aside that we've got evidence right here in the fact that certain customers are getting ripped off that implicit trust is not rewarded, I've ALREADY been shown that trusting them to deliver a quality add-on when they said they would is not necessarily well-placed. And anyway, whether or not you trust the company to do the right thing, you're still encouraging them NOT to by purchasing a DLC without any concern about its merit or its integrity in regards to the customer. Maybe you're trying to do one of those Bible things and expecting them to make the right decision while offering them the temptation and incentive not to, but if not, then you best hope your trust pays off, because you're giving them no reason not to betray it if they get paid either way.
I trust Bioware enough that I'm not going to be stupid and decide here and now over this one ME2 DLC mistake that I'm done with the company and boycotting their goods. I don't trust them enough that I'm going to pretend that they aren't capable of bad decisions again when they've just made one.
And while I certainly agree with you that Bioware isn't financially strapped I also believe that if people don't buy DLC companies would stop making it. And if you gave me a choice between alternate appearance packs/headgear and nothing then I'd rather just take what's being offered. Especially when the price ranges from completely free to $2.
The issue isn't not buying any DLC. The issue is buying DLC that has substance, and DLC that doesn't actively screw over customers. I've bought Kasumi's DLC. I haven't bought this one, or the Alternate Appearances pack. If Bioware were to base their entire marketing strategy on me, which would be awesome but unlikely, they wouldn't STOP making DLC. They would just stop making the DLC that they can't sell--the pointless ones that don't significantly influence the game at all. My not buying bad decisions does not mean that the good ones will never come about as a result; it actually encourages them.
But while they won't base everything on just me, they WILL be looking at the sales figures and reactions of the people at large. Which is why people blindly buying, as you're advocating, is a bad idea regardless of how little it costs--because it tells them "Do this again!" If a lot of people refuse to buy the stuff that's just not worth it and/or rips off customers, however, the message they get isn't "Don't do anything ever again." It's "Bad idea; try a different one."
Which brings up my other point that it seems like people can't be satisfied. How much free **** were you people expecting to get? I hear guys raving "The CN is completely useless" and "We didn't get anything for having the CN". There's been 3 or 4 DLC packages released now that were completely free because of CN. And we don't even know if that's the end of free stuff. But people want to complain about TWO DOLLARS worth of DLC that's being charged. And I agree with the poster who made the comment about small dollars being used to trick a consumer into thinking he's getting a good deal. But I don't think that applies when several free items were being offered beforehand. Like at what point can a company say "okay we've released five free things so we're going to charge for this." I don't think that's unfair.
This much I can agree with you on. I was surprised, after Dragon Age's history of rip-off add-ons, that ME was offering such significant DLC for free. People shouldn't be complaining about having to pay at this point for anything, and those that do are unreasonable. But most people aren't--most are complaining about WHAT they're paying for, and once again, they're right to do so.
EDIT: Oh, didn't know that the game's price was increased to reflect the Cerberus Network. Well...still, I'd say Zaeed and the Firewalker combined could reasonably have covered that extra. Paying for more content's still fair to me, in theory.
Modifié par The RPGenius, 04 mai 2010 - 09:26 .