Willowhugger wrote...
To be fair, I'm not sure whether Anora ever betrays you.
She's quite clear about what she will do.
(Husband posting) I agree. This is view on Anora in contrast to my wife (the anti-Anora main poster of the account). I see Anora in D&D terms as being "true Neutral" with various nuances. Kind of like a wild animal. Not deliberately malicious like overtly evil creatures (Orcs, darkspawn) yet it could maul you if you provoke it. But you could have also have an affectionate relationship with it like a wild animal tamer given the right bonding and carefully respecting its social rules.
Instead of foraging around for food, Anora is power and security driven. If you threaten that its like trying to take a big steak away from a hungry grizzly bear... of course its going to try to maul you! Of course if you respect that sort of thing you can get along the bear and even have it learn and perform circus tricks.
In terms of alignment I dont' see her any worse then Zevran. A person whose loyalty also can easily shift depending who has the upper hand and the most gold. The difference is Zev starts out with "affably evil" trope which soon switches to just "affably neutral". While Anora has overly formal, stiff. Outside of glibness and superficial charm I think a real case of moral equivalency could be made. (The Zev fans I'm sure would disagree and point out his potential loyalty to the player in the end game with his personal quest vs. the Crows. But I would see this as purely do the game mechanic of the approval meter. I would suggest you would most likely see the same thing in Anora if all NPC likewise had approval meters and ratings).
Modifié par Addai67, 06 mai 2010 - 11:16 .