To execute or not to execute: The Loghain dilemma
#26
Posté 10 mai 2010 - 02:45
1) PC doesn't trust this man after all he has done personally to her/him
2) PC thinks he/she is a more competent leader as all of Loghain's plans blow up in his face and he was the one who did the battleplan at Ostagar in the first place.
3) PC either beats him in the duel (or Alistair does if I don't feel like listening to Riordan's "lets recruit him" line) and in her/his opinion, Loghain as a soldier is past his time.
That said I DO NOT like killing him in front of his daughter. That has to be IMO one of the most brutal scenes in the game.
But just killing him? yea i got no problem with that.
#27
Posté 10 mai 2010 - 02:49
I was kind of hoping he would change his mind at the last second or something, but that didn't happen, sadly.
#28
Posté 10 mai 2010 - 03:16
However, I just read "The Stolen Throne," and have a new opinion on Loghain. Maric pretty much wouldn't have survived without him and Ferelden owes him a lot. Plus I can understand Loghain's freakout after reading Cailan's correspondence retrieved at Ostagar.
I've since deleted the endings from my Dwarf Noble and Human Noble and redid the Landsmeet so as to let him live. I married off Alistair to Anora in the Human Noble playthrough and became Chancellor.
Alistair wasn't hardened in the Dwarf Noble playthrough and wouldn't marry Anora so she gets to rule alone. I did ask Anora to spare Alistair's life although the pouty expression on his face almost did him in.
I wish my character could have said to him, "My brother Bhelen killed Trian and had me framed. My father may or may not have been poisoned by Bhelen. I chose to put Bhelen on Orzammar's throne instead of taking my revenge because I felt it was best for my people. Don't lecture me about betrayal. It takes more than blood to be nobility."
#29
Posté 11 mai 2010 - 07:36
By the way: Alistair shows no compassion and mercy for Loghain. That makes him rather a tyrant than a king. There are other possible punishments besides death penalty.
Wynne actually says as much, not to Alistair, but to the PC. I don't think anyone listens to her though, which is why she always has a huge chip on her shoulder lol
#30
Posté 11 mai 2010 - 08:11
#31
Posté 11 mai 2010 - 08:42
Killing Loghain is actually a pretty Loghain thing to do, that's why I have no trouble doing it.SOLID_EVEREST wrote...
In my first playthrough, I had no idea Alistair had the b***s to actually kill Loghain. I thought Alistair would've come to his senses when I told him to execute Loghain himself, which made me think of when you tell him to kill Zevran. Anyways, I was so pissed off at Alistair I felt like freaking killing him after that. I never would dream of killing Loghain because of what Riordan pretty much said, and I didn't feel like killing someone who already surrendered. After that scene, I lost all respect for Alistair.
Wait, no trouble is wrong, it does bother me in a way but it's a valid route to take. Plus, Alistair truly believes that Loghain is guilty of treason even if he can't prove it, and I can't prove him wrong (even if I wanted to).
Modifié par klarabella, 11 mai 2010 - 01:25 .
#32
Posté 11 mai 2010 - 01:20
#33
Posté 11 mai 2010 - 03:31
I admit that he does deserve to die for some of his faults, but he also stands a chance at redeming himself. If you give him the chance and if your a human noble who marries the queen. You will see how much of a good choice he was to keep alive in Awakening.
#34
Guest_Trust_*
Posté 11 mai 2010 - 03:34
Guest_Trust_*
Brako Shepard wrote...
I admit that he does deserve to die for some of his faults, but he also stands a chance at redeming himself. If you give him the chance and if your a human noble who marries the queen. You will see how much of a good choice he was to keep alive in Awakening.
I'll agree, he has one very interesting cameo.
Modifié par AwesomeEffect2, 11 mai 2010 - 03:36 .
#35
Posté 11 mai 2010 - 03:50
Modifié par AnniLau, 11 mai 2010 - 03:51 .
#36
Posté 11 mai 2010 - 09:22
klarabella wrote...
Killing Loghain is actually a pretty Loghain thing to do, that's why I have no trouble doing it.SOLID_EVEREST wrote...
In my first playthrough, I had no idea Alistair had the b***s to actually kill Loghain. I thought Alistair would've come to his senses when I told him to execute Loghain himself, which made me think of when you tell him to kill Zevran. Anyways, I was so pissed off at Alistair I felt like freaking killing him after that. I never would dream of killing Loghain because of what Riordan pretty much said, and I didn't feel like killing someone who already surrendered. After that scene, I lost all respect for Alistair.
Wait, no trouble is wrong, it does bother me in a way but it's a valid route to take. Plus, Alistair truly believes that Loghain is guilty of treason even if he can't prove it, and I can't prove him wrong (even if I wanted to).
If you are truely a grey warden, you would spare Loghain. Riordan has more wisdom about being a grey warden than you or Alistair put together, and even he wants to spare Loghain. If you kill Loghain, you are being the worst grey warden ever. I mean why can't you accept Loghain's surrender since a lot of grey wardens were given the title as somewhat of a punishment i.e. Daveth, City Elf, and Dwarf Commoner. I don't really care if Loghain would kill the Warden or not, but he is not a grey warden so he doesn't have to defend that whole oath of "everything it takes to win." I think even Levi talks about Loghain during the Warden's Tower quest.
#37
Guest_Massamies_*
Posté 11 mai 2010 - 09:45
Guest_Massamies_*
Modifié par Massamies, 11 mai 2010 - 09:51 .
#38
Posté 11 mai 2010 - 09:54
#39
Posté 11 mai 2010 - 10:05
Here I thought it was called the Right of Conscription not the Duty of Conscription.SOLID_EVEREST wrote...
If you are truely a grey warden, you would spare Loghain.
And in his infinite wisdom he leaves the decision to me? Obviously recruiting Loghain is not important enough.SOLID_EVEREST wrote...
Riordan has more wisdom about being a grey warden than you or Alistair put together, and even he wants to spare Loghain.
Am I now? And should I even care? Btw. my job is to end the Blight, not to forgive Loghain. I don't even know if I can trust Loghain at that point.SOLID_EVEREST wrote...If you kill Loghain, you are being the worst grey warden ever.
None of them are guilty of allowing the Blight to spread all over the country, thus making it more and more difficult to defeat it.SOLID_EVEREST wrote...
I mean why can't you accept Loghain's surrender since a lot of grey wardens were given the title as somewhat of a punishment i.e. Daveth, City Elf, and Dwarf Commoner.
So? I actually do care. Survival is a means to ending the Blight, you know.SOLID_EVEREST wrote...
I don't really care if Loghain would kill the Warden or not, but he is not a grey warden so he doesn't have to defend that whole oath of "everything it takes to win."
Modifié par klarabella, 11 mai 2010 - 10:11 .
#40
Posté 11 mai 2010 - 10:08
#41
Posté 11 mai 2010 - 10:09
Seems Riordan's full of bad decisons. If he'd the foresight to describe the whole sacrifice situation at Eamon's estate then Alistair may have been talked into backing down, though I'm not sure. More than that, though, after the landsmeet he goes off scouting the horde on his own despite not knowing whether or not the only other wardens in Ferelden even know how to end a blight. But I guess that's to accomodate the story.Massamies wrote...
Riordan should have talked about it before the Landsmeet, even if he was not sure about availability of the ingredients, it was stupid to bring up at last moment. Both options can be logical. Some people may not trust him or his judgement. Also some people might not see his sudden conversion from you being Orlesian puppetmaster to best hope of Ferelden when his life is at your hands, genuine. He might be too big risk. Also knowing that Loghain is only potential recruit is meta-game, from in game perspective you could think that you could recruit just some other good fighter, at that point it shouldn't have been that hard to find some one to volunteer to help to stop the blight.
Plus riding the archdemon was a pretty stupid thing to do.
#42
Posté 11 mai 2010 - 10:20
The Stolen Throne increased my dislike for Loghain. It allows you to see him as more of a tragic figure, rather than just teh eevuul. However, it only shows that his hatred of Orlais has become a dark spiral that nearly consumes everything, not just himself. Contrast this to his father. What would his father say about his actions in Origins?KOKitten wrote...
However, I just read "The Stolen Throne," and have a new opinion on Loghain. Maric pretty much wouldn't have survived without him and Ferelden owes him a lot. Plus I can understand Loghain's freakout after reading Cailan's correspondence retrieved at Ostagar.
As far as owing people, Loghain would be dead if not for Rowan. Yet he betrayed her son, too, not just Maric's.
#43
Posté 12 mai 2010 - 12:24
I agree with you, DA:O paints him as some 'I regret I have but one life to give to my country,' patriot, but I saw none of that in The Stolen Throne. He despises the Orlesians (no doubt, rightfully) because of what they did to his mother, and he protects Maric because its his father's dying wish.Addai67 wrote...
The Stolen Throne increased my dislike for Loghain. It allows you to see him as more of a tragic figure, rather than just teh eevuul. However, it only shows that his hatred of Orlais has become a dark spiral that nearly consumes everything, not just himself. Contrast this to his father. What would his father say about his actions in Origins?KOKitten wrote...
However, I just read "The Stolen Throne," and have a new opinion on Loghain. Maric pretty much wouldn't have survived without him and Ferelden owes him a lot. Plus I can understand Loghain's freakout after reading Cailan's correspondence retrieved at Ostagar.
As far as owing people, Loghain would be dead if not for Rowan. Yet he betrayed her son, too, not just Maric's.
And given his feelings for Rowan, the Ostagar battle shows him in an even colder and evil light given he premeditated her only son's death. My opinion of him went down after reading TST further; in DA:O I could see him as a fanatical patriot making horrible choices but wanting to protect Ferelden... but after it, he's just a DB.
#44
Posté 12 mai 2010 - 06:30
#45
Posté 12 mai 2010 - 09:15
Admittedly Loghain was an unwilling participant at first, but what I got from the book was that he started to care a great deal about Fereldan after a while - enough that he'd give up the woman he loved for the good of the country.
I don't believe that Cailan's death was premeditated, either - I saw it as a decision made on the spur of the moment, and not made lightly. (See David Gaider's second post here).
As for Alistair's fit, it didn't make me feel guilty - it had the opposite effect - that of making me go from liking Alistair to wanting to garrote him with Sten's jockstrap.
#46
Posté 13 mai 2010 - 12:51
CalJones wrote...
The irony is that Duncan himself was conscripted into the Wardens as a punishment. (The particularls of that are in The Calling, if you're interested).
Yes, but Duncan did not believe that the Grey Wardens were agents of Orlais out to conquer and oppress his country, nor had he attempted to eradicate them. I don't see why the fact that he's lost a combat to you makes him magically reject all his old beliefs and adopt all new ones. He thinks that Orlais (and by illogical extension, the Grey Wardens) is a bigger danger to Ferelden than the Blight. And even if he were to be convinced otherwise here and now--what if the Archdemon decides to head for Orlais instead of Ferelden? You really think Loghain will be willing to risk his life for Orlais? A Grey Warden's first commitment must be to fighting Darkspawn wherever they are, regardless of national loyalties. A man cannot serve two masters.
And no, I don't believe the Joining changes people that much and that quickly. After all, Alistair is able to abandon the Wardens and he actually believed in the cause.
Sorry--if I had an option to sentence him to hard labor rebuilding Lothering or sell him into slavery in Tevinter, I might consider it. But Loghain has already betrayed one commander on the battlefield and I'm not going into battle with a known traitor in my midst. He just isn't worth the risk. My PC just isn't that trusting, not after what Howe did to his family.
Now, Ser Cauthrien...oh, if perchance she is brought up on charges for her role in Loghain's crimes, I would gladly welcome her to the Wardens.
edited to add: RP it your way. It's not my intention to dictate your choices, but it irks me when people claim that there's only one good path or only one true "Grey Warden" path. Sure, IF my PC knew that a Warden had to be sacrificed and that Loghain would be loyal and willing to be that sacrifice, he might be willing to make Loghain a warden. But then, if my character knew Alistair would abandon the Wardens at that point and that he was making a choice between Alistair & Loghain, there's no way he'd choose Loghain--Alistair's the better fighter.
Modifié par maxernst, 13 mai 2010 - 01:25 .
#47
Guest_Hanz54321_*
Posté 13 mai 2010 - 01:07
Guest_Hanz54321_*
Mine is about redemption.
Slight decision making side discussion. Alistair is my friend, I harden him, and he will make a good king. Anora proved in her cut scene argument with Lohgain and Howe that she is acting in the best interests of Fereldan (she agreed w Cailan on uniting w the Orlesians) and she's got some heart (she is upset that Lohgain let Cailan die and won't listen to reason).
Point of side discussion - I married the two so that they could both rule fairly, compassionately, and neither would need execute the other.
Now to redemption:
I let Sten redeem himself for failing to defend his fellows in battle, losing his sword, and killing the farmers.
I let Leliana redeem herself from a life of spying, assasination, and whoring.
I let Zevran redeem himself from his life as an assasin and killing the woman he loved.
I let Oghren . . . you see my point.
So I let Lohgain redeem himself. He was never evil, just misguided and overzealous about defending Ferelden from Orlais. By the time I'm done with him, he is regretful, respects the Wardens, and sees that the Blight is the true threat to his beloved homeland . . . though he remains suspicious of Orlais.
#48
Posté 13 mai 2010 - 02:37
#49
Guest_Hanz54321_*
Posté 13 mai 2010 - 06:49
Guest_Hanz54321_*
Apparently Cailan was a better strategist and leader than I thought . . . and he knew Lohgain and Anora were becoming a liability.
So now I wonder if I really should stick Alistair with those two. Obviously Cailan wanted them out of the picture for the stability of the nation. It's more of a political thing than a redemption thing.
I guess if Anora and Loghain straightened up and got on the same page w Alistair it'd still be redemption. But I know if you take Loghain to "Return to Ostagar" he sees those documents and has a fit. So maybe he's not really one to trust at Fereldan's back - the guy might just betray everyone again as suggested in above posts.
Modifié par Hanz54321, 13 mai 2010 - 07:39 .
#50
Posté 13 mai 2010 - 09:33
The letters to the Empress do suggest an "alliance" would have been attempted (again, there is no evidence to say Cailan would have married her - though that would have been the easiest way to secure such an alliance in historical terms. But that is conjecture).
If you've read The Calling then you'd know having anything to do with Orlais is very, very bad. I suppose it's a matter of perspective but when I saw the documents I thought Loghain made the right choice by leaving Cailan to die - Cailan was the liability, not Loghain. My personal viewpoint, of course.
If you're doing a redemption playthrough then you're right in sparing Loghain. Just as if you would be justified in executing him for a revenge playthrough.





Retour en haut





