47 réponses à ce sujet

[Sean2112bd]

The mages of the Circle are also divided into several fraternities, the equivalent of political parties, which hold diverse views of how mages should act and their place in society. The prominent fraternities are featured below.

The Loyalists: Loyalists seek to strengthen the ties between mages and the Chantry and seek a closer 'cooperation' between the two. They often come into conflict with the Libertarians on this matter.

The Libertarians: Libertarians seek to aquire more independence for the Circle by weakening the control that the Chantry currently has on Magic; some Libertarians even wish to break away completly from the Chantry's supervision. They often come into conflict with the Loyalists on this matter.

The Aequitarians: Aequitarians seek not to go to extremes in any matter concerning magic. Although there is some disagreement among them of where the perfect 'balance' lies, all aequitarians are pragmatists at heart, and are often called to broker compromise between the Libertarians and the Loyalists.

The Lucrosians: Lucrosians think that every affair of mages should be aimed at acquiring wealth and power by any means necessary.

The Isolationists: Isolationists are of the opinion that mages are not fit to live a 'normal' life, with other mages or among ordinary people. Instead, they should seek to live alone as hermits out in the wilds, far from civilization, where they can cause no harm to other people.

I'm probably Aequetarian leaning towards Libertarian, but my main character is a Templar 

Modifié par Sean2112bd, 09 mai 2010 - 04:38 .

[hexaligned]

I would be violently Libertarian. Very violently.

[yasuraka.hakkyou]

Libertarian. maybe violently like relhart.

[Chuvvy]

Aequitarian or Isolationist. Isolationist not so much because I don't want to harm people more because I don't want people to mess with me.

Modifié par Slidell505, 09 mai 2010 - 05:04 .

[Sean2112bd]

Slidell505 wrote...

Aequitarian or Isolationist. Isolationist not so much because I don't want to harm people more because I don't want people to mess with me.

Isolationist doesn't seem to be that bad, except there's really no guarantee that they're going to stay that way. 

[The Velveteen Rabbit]

Libertarians FTW!

[vometia]

Whichever one offers the longest lie-in in the morning. And cheesy biscuits.

Failing any consensus on late mornings and savoury nibbles, Aequitarians, probably.

[Tonkarz]

I'm a Libertarian, with the opinion that mages need to police themselves... except in practice they are pretty bad at it. I leave the tower for like a week and come back to find half of the tower are crazy blood mages now. How did the good mages not notice? There aren't any out of the way places for them to practice (with 2 exceptions that are very hard to get into).

[Nerdage]

Julian_Kraynog wrote...

Maleficar.

Well put.

I guess I'd be an Aequitarian at heart, but a distaste for chantry oppression demands I join the Libertarians.

[Redframe0416]

Julian_Kraynog wrote...

Maleficar.

=win

[Lord Aravail]

I'd probably be more of an Aequetarian. My first mage was leaning towards libertarian for a while, but the Mage's Tower quest quickly changed that view. The Templars may be cruel, but without them, Ferelden would have far more to worry about than just darkspawn. Imprisoning the mages in the tower is unfortunate, but it's a necessary evil to protect the world from demons and maleficar.

[Herr Uhl]

Lucrosian.



Because I want more money.

[I_Love_Leliana]

The ones that are most liberal in terms of sexuality.

[mousestalker]

Dalish Keeper.



Velanna is about as whacked out as they get. They don't seem to do the whole "Let's bargain with demons" thing that Circle mages do.

[vometia]

mousestalker wrote...

Velanna is about as whacked out as they get. They don't seem to do the whole "Let's bargain with demons" thing that Circle mages do.

Velanna's a classic example of an only child.

Erm... I'll post part II when I think of what possible relevance my comment might have to this thread.  I may be some time.

[TheBlackBaron]

I'll be different and say Lucrosians. That way we can just bribe the Grand Cleric to set the mages free.

[The Velveteen Rabbit]

Julian_Kraynog wrote...

Maleficar.

No one told me that was an option.

[Frolk]

Aequitarian with sympathies towards the Libertarians.  I agree that mages need to be monitored, but I think the methods that the Chantry uses are unfair.  Ultimately, I'd like to see the Circle of Magi police itself, but I wouldn't be willing to take part in a violent revolution to see that goal realized.

[MysteriXOX]

It is hard to say which fraternity I would belong to as really none of them suit me . If I had to choose one though I guess I would go the Libertarian because I would want to free myself from the Chantry rule. I am a bit of a rebel at heart.

[Northern Sun]

Assuming I'm not already a apostate/maleficar, certainly libertarian.

[yasuraka.hakkyou]

revision to my post: If "given the choice", Dalish Keeper / First. If forced into the circle, then Libertarian.

[thegreateski]

None.

The Libertarians and the Loyalist are going to get us all killed.
The Aequitarians can't make up their minds and I have no desire to play "peacekeeper".
The Lucrosians are greedy. I can admire that but want no part in it.
And the Isolationists really can't think things through. Living on an island somewhere would just result in being hunted down and killed by a pack of idiots (villagers) who blame me for *insert stupid problem here*.

Modifié par thegreateski, 09 mai 2010 - 07:33 .

[Sean2112bd]

 I guess no one's a loyalist lol