131 réponses à ce sujet

[Microwaved_Toast]

I would absolutely love it and buy it in seconds. If they made it with the epic combat and style of ME3 but with different armor/weapons etc (to add a little variety ofc), it would be the best day of my life!

Tbh, I wouldn't even mind if they re-used a lot of the old sound effects/voice sound files from ME1 (and maybe added some new ones, perhaps) in order to save on Ye Olde Moneys!

It's most likely a Pipe Dream of mine, but I'll keep on wishing...

[Mandalorian9]

Keltoris wrote...

Would rather have KotOR1 remade to ME2 standard.<br />
<br />
Hells yea?

Oh yea, I'd love to see that.

[Mr Zoat2]

No. I wouldn't mind a graphics update and maybe a slightly greater variety of buildings but I actually preferred the fights in ME1. Everyone and their dog is releasing waist high wall shooters these days.

[Zolt51]

I don't see that it needs re-doing. Whatever improvements could be brought with current technology just won't make a huge difference.

30 years from now with tech we haven't dreamed of yet and a "reimagined" storyline? Why not?

[Samtheman63]

Yeah, with a nice collectors edition case for PC to go along side 2 & 3, they look so lonely

[vixvicco]

I definitely would. I actually hope they make one.

[DMaarten]

I would buy a remake of ME1 for the PS3 on day one and full price!

[Lord Bicen]

How about this... take the Gameplay for 3, the item system from ME1 (And VEHICLE Combat), and the Mission Styling and cutscene interactions (Minus the way they did Zaeed and Kasumi Goto) for ME2 and remake all three. ofcourse the Combat gunplay mechanics from ME3 too... So long as they Fix the damned ending of three instead of this "Artistic Vision" of theirs which is basically a Deus Ex Rip off. Artistic Vision indeed...Bah. and Instead of Just Scanning for war assets in ME3, Actually design MISSIONS planetside to EARN the assets. Maybe with the Choice of using the Mako (For heavier resistance) the Hammerhead (For tactical quick strikes) and the Atlas for additional ground squad Close Combat Support (After you steal/recover it from Cerberus).

I'd Be willing to give them a Chance to fix all their Screw ups, and have a better Linear feel of Gameplay from one to the next, but ABSOLUTELY DO NOT take away the ability to make choices or customize YOUR Commander Shepard, or the ability to make a FEM Shep, I dont play a Femshep but i like the ability to do it if i should happen to want to, and my sister gamers that Do play Fem Shep's shouldnt be disenfranchised.

The More Options the better.

AND FOR GODS SAKE! DONT RUSH THROUGH IT LIKE YOU DID ME3!
Bring back the original Story Writer, and dont let CASEY HUDSON anywhere near this project!

Modifié par Lord Bicen, 16 juillet 2012 - 10:41 .

[hizzle32]

I only play on PS3 so I would love to be able to play ME1 since I have never had the pleasure.

[thelonelycyclist]

I hope they don't remake the first game at least while they are not affiliated to EA,can you imagine how bad it will be,they will streamline the hell out of it and add loads of cheap and tacky elements like sexual innuendoes cheesy auto dialogue and few dialogue options,gears of war elements,no customisation,no exploration and no ground vehicle,no thanks.

[Fauxnormal]

Ignoring the QQers- I'd buy this. The graphics and gameplay in ME1 are painful.

[KotorEffect3]

Yeah if it does something about those copy and paste environments I would.

[ZwipeAir]

For Playsi 3? Definitely!! Want to play all 3 ME Games in a row, Mass Effect Marathon 

Modifié par ZwipeAir, 19 septembre 2012 - 08:25 .

[capn233]

Blast from the past.

I probably wouldn't if it was simple graphics tweak. If they at the least changed the quick slots on the HUD so I could add the squad's powers to them, then maybe. If it had ME2+ move commands, cover mechanics then it would be more likely.

This is not a knock on the idea, but I have played ME1 as recently as last April so I don't find the old graphics that big a deal.

Modifié par capn233, 19 septembre 2012 - 09:25 .

[PsiFive]

starlitegirlx, I think the idea of remaking ME1 would be to fix its flaws and make it play much more like 2. At the same time they could fix 2 by putting in some of the ME1 features that they dropped, e.g. inventory (just one that was easier to manage). 

Mass Effect 3 has not happened and I'm very much looking forward to seeing what it's like when it comes out.

[Tonymac]

282xvl wrote...

At considerable risk of being flammed to a crisp, I pose this question:

Would anyone anyone have paying interest in a Remake of Mass Effect One to update it to the ME 2 gameplay mechanics? Before you grab for the flamethrower, please understand that by suggesting this I am not trying to denigrate the quality or style of ME 1... however, I feel that ME 2+ME 3 being built on the same principles and engine provides a unique opportunity to revist ME 1 and synchronize it with the other two.

The cost would be pretty low since 100% of neccisary VA work is already done and 90%+ of the dialogue sequences can essentially be used as-is. I feel that an unchanging gameplay mechanic is the only way to make epic, 3-game playthoughs truly "feel" right. The pacing and style of ME 1 doesn't IMO blend well with the same in ME 2/3.

Whether you favor one or the other style, to me it feels clunky to adapt back and forth. A remake edition would also allow for minor touch-ups to the game in graphic tech etc (remember the texture pop-in on the cutscenes.) The elevators and point-and-click galaxy map are fine left alone. Such a remake as I am proposing would focus on synchronising the feel of COMBAT across all three games and streamlining out the more cumbersome ME 1 mechanics.

The only thing I can see that would be troublesome would be the MAKO random worlds. These would have to be replaced with from-scratch ME 2-styled sidequests. Otherwise MAKO sequences in the missions can be cutscened etc. However ME 2 style sidequests don't seem TOO expensive to make, and they could even forgo unique dialogue for them in favor of the stock ME 1 text-bubble sidequest backstory presentation.

I, for one, would definately offer loving support (and my purchasing power) to a tasteful ME 1 remake. Revisiting the original game story with a the modern game mechanics wouldn't be very expensive and would make for  very smooth and satisfying 200 hour trilogy playthough experiences.

The question is, how many of YOU would support it? If enough of you do I could actually see it happening. Voice your support or fire the flamethrowers!

I would buy ME1 if it were in the ME2 game engine.  I thought that the ME2 engine was better then ME3's engine, in all honesty.  Characters in ME3 just didn't look right.

ME1 does look pretty amazing with the film grain feature disabled though.

[PsiFive]

Spectre David Shepard wrote...

PsiFive wrote...

starlitegirlx, I think the idea of remaking ME1 would be to fix its flaws and make it play much more like 2. At the same time they could fix 2 by putting in some of the ME1 features that they dropped, e.g. inventory (just one that was easier to manage). 

Mass Effect 3 has not happened and I'm very much looking forward to seeing what it's like when it comes out.

The hate for ME3 is absurd.

I mean...it's one thing to have an opinion on the game...as I personally love it and think it's the best of the three...

...but it's ridiculous to bash the game every chance you get even in threads where the topic is not about ME3 at all.

To each their own I guess.

Jeez, mate, lighten up. I was being tongue in cheek, hence the winking smiley. As to why I mentioned ME3 at all, note that I was responding to a post which touched on ME3, albeit in passing. My answer didn't address that part at all so I just threw a jokey and slightly self deprecating line on the end that nobody would take literally, but would explain to starlitegirlx why I didn't do her the courtesy of a complete reply. If my intention had been to bash ME3 again I'd have written a text wall or two on all the story elements that are senseless and immersion breaking to the point of making me literally laugh out loud in a couple of cases. A one line mention with a smiley is not a bashing.

[PsiFive]

Tonymac wrote...

282xvl wrote...

At considerable risk of being flammed to a crisp, I pose this question:

Would anyone anyone have paying interest in a Remake of Mass Effect One to update it to the ME 2 gameplay mechanics? Before you grab for the flamethrower, please understand that by suggesting this I am not trying to denigrate the quality or style of ME 1... however, I feel that ME 2+ME 3 being built on the same principles and engine provides a unique opportunity to revist ME 1 and synchronize it with the other two.

The cost would be pretty low since 100% of neccisary VA work is already done and 90%+ of the dialogue sequences can essentially be used as-is. I feel that an unchanging gameplay mechanic is the only way to make epic, 3-game playthoughs truly "feel" right. The pacing and style of ME 1 doesn't IMO blend well with the same in ME 2/3.

Whether you favor one or the other style, to me it feels clunky to adapt back and forth. A remake edition would also allow for minor touch-ups to the game in graphic tech etc (remember the texture pop-in on the cutscenes.) The elevators and point-and-click galaxy map are fine left alone. Such a remake as I am proposing would focus on synchronising the feel of COMBAT across all three games and streamlining out the more cumbersome ME 1 mechanics.

The only thing I can see that would be troublesome would be the MAKO random worlds. These would have to be replaced with from-scratch ME 2-styled sidequests. Otherwise MAKO sequences in the missions can be cutscened etc. However ME 2 style sidequests don't seem TOO expensive to make, and they could even forgo unique dialogue for them in favor of the stock ME 1 text-bubble sidequest backstory presentation.

I, for one, would definately offer loving support (and my purchasing power) to a tasteful ME 1 remake. Revisiting the original game story with a the modern game mechanics wouldn't be very expensive and would make for  very smooth and satisfying 200 hour trilogy playthough experiences.

The question is, how many of YOU would support it? If enough of you do I could actually see it happening. Voice your support or fire the flamethrowers!

I would buy ME1 if it were in the ME2 game engine.  I thought that the ME2 engine was better then ME3's engine, in all honesty.  Characters in ME3 just didn't look right.

ME1 does look pretty amazing with the film grain feature disabled though.

All three games use exactly the same engine: Unreal Engine 3. Agree with you about the film grain though. I guess it was meant to add atmosphere or something but after a few playthroughs I turned it off and found I preferred it that way.

[coldwetn0se]

You know, I really do like playing ME1 the way it is, and ME2 the way it is. I have no problem with it being updated, since it isn't like someone is going to come to my house, and confiscate my original copy of ME1....hehe! I just wouldn't see a good reason (for myself) to buy a revamp.

Fistbump to PsiFive...for reasons.......

[Staff Cdr Alenko]

PsiFive wrote...

(...)

Mass Effect 3 has not happened and I'm very much looking forward to seeing what it's like when it comes out.

I like this human! He understands!

As for the main question, I don't think ME1 needs a remake. For me, the combat isn't worse than in ME2, it's just different, more KotOR-ish. I love ME1 to death, including the gameplay. Some of the most intense fights in the series I had in ME1 - namely all-shotgun approach to Thorian creeper level and Listening Post Alpha Rachni waves fight - on foot, with a sniper rifle. I wouldn't want to see the gameplay changed, it suits the game very well, along with its open structure, the focus on exploration.

Then again, I also love ME2. Its gameplay lacks some of that KotOR magic, but is incredibly satisfying in its own way and - most importantly - feels like a continuation of ME1 gameplay. It's very heavily changed, yes, simplified as well, but it does have the feel of continuity from the first game. And amazingly, just like its predecessor, it fits the structure of the game, which isn't as open as before, it's simplified and more concentrated, but it somehow fits the story. Another point in it's favour - it doesn't have idiotic combat rolls.